Yang–Mills moduli space

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Lead rewrite Template:Short description In gauge theory, the Yang–Mills moduli space (short YM moduli space, also instanton moduli space) is the moduli space of the Yang–Mills equations, hence the space of its solutions up to gauge. It is used in Donaldson's theorem, proven in Template:Harv and improved in Template:Harv, which was listed as a contribution for Simon Donaldson winning the Fields Medal in 1986, and to defined the Donaldson invariants used to study four-dimensional smooth manifolds (short 4-manifolds). A difficulity is, that the Yang–Mills moduli space is usually not compact and has to be compactified around singularities through laborious techniques. An improvement later appeared with the always compact Seiberg–Witten moduli space. The Yang–Mills moduli space is named after Chen-Ning Yang and Robert Mills, who introduced the underlying Yang–Mills equations in 1954.

In four dimensions, see also four-dimensional Yang–Mills theory, important subspaces of the Yang-Mills moduli space are the self-dual Yang-Mills moduli space (short SDYM moduli space, also self-dual instanton moduli space) of solutions of the self-dual Yang-Mills equations up to gauge and the anti self-dual Yang-Mills moduli space (short ASDYM moduli space, also anti self-dual instanton moduli space) of solutions of the anti self-dual Yang-Mills equations up to gauge.

Definition

Let G be a Lie group with Lie algebra 𝔤 and π:P↠X be a principal G-bundle over a smooth manifold X, which automatically makes P a smooth manifold as well. Let Ad⁡(P):=P×G𝔤 be the adjoint bundle, then the Yang–Mills equations as well as the (anti) self-dual Yang–Mills equations are formulated on the configuration space:

𝒜=Ω1(X,Ad⁡(P))≅ΩAd1(P,𝔤)

where the isomorphism requires a choice of local sections si:Ui↪P for an open cover (Ui)i∈I⊂X (or alternatively a connection since the latter space is an affine vector space, which makes the isomorphism non-canonical) and is then given by:

ΩAd1(P,𝔤)→≅Ω1(X,Ad⁡(P)),A↦(si∗A)i∈I.

Since the configuration space is an infinite-dimensional vector space, it is more difficult to handle. But also due to the group action on the principal bundle, it is plausible to consider a group action on the configuration space with the following gauge group:

𝒢:=C∞(P,G)G≅C∞(X,G)≅Aut⁡(P)

where the isomorphisms are given using the free and transitive action of G on the fibers of P (with G as a superscript meaning the G-equivariant maps and which are canonical):

C∞(X,G)→≅Aut⁡(P),f↦(p↦p⋅f(π(p)));
C∞(P,G)G→≅Aut⁡(P),f↦(p↦p⋅f(p)).

A principal bundle automorphism P→P induces a vector bundle automorphism Ad⁡(P)→Ad⁡(P), causing the gauge group 𝒢 to act free on the configuration space 𝒜 and resulting in the orbit space:[1][2]

ℬ:=𝒜/𝒢.

It can be shown that the Yang–Mills equations are gauge invariant and hence are formulated over just this orbit space. Its solution form the Yang–Mills moduli space:[3]

ℳP:={[A]∈ℬ|dA⋆FA=0}.

If X is a 4-manifold, then four-dimensional Yang–Mills theory furthermore allows the definition of the (anti) self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space:[4][2]

ℳPASD:={[A]∈ℬ|⋆FA=−FA};
ℳPSD:={[A]∈ℬ|⋆FA=+FA}.

(While notations like ℳP− or ℳP+ can also be used, it can be confusing as the (anti) self-dual Yang–Mills equations ⋆FA=±FA can also be written as FA∓=0 with the sign in the notation reversed.) There are canonical inclusions ℳPASD,ℳPSD↪ℳP+. The intersection ℳPASD∩ℳPSD includes exactly the flat connections, the critical points of the Chern–Simons action functional, and could therefore be referred to as Chern–Simons moduli space.

Properties

  • The anti self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space of a principal SU(2)-bundle over a Riemannian 4-manifold is orientable.[5] This more generally holds for principal SU⁡(n)-bundles.[6]
  • The self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space of a principal SO⁡(3)-bundle P↠X with p2(P)[X]≤3 over a compact orientable Riemannian 4-manifold X is compact.[7]
  • If X is a 4-manifold, then:[8][9][10]
dim⁡ℳPSD=2p1(Ad⁡(P))[X]−dim⁡G(1−b1+b2−).
dim⁡ℳPSD=−8c2(P)[X]−3(1−b1+b2−).
dim⁡ℳPSD=2p1(P)[X]−3(1−b1+b2−).

It is important to consider the different sign conventions regarding the characteristic classes in the first term: Instantons and Four-Manifolds uses the convention here, while the later The Geometry of Four-Manifolds uses the reverse convention.

Application

Self-dual SU(2) moduli space

For the proof of Donaldson's theorem, Simon Donaldson considered the self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space ℳPSD of the unique principal SU(2)-bundle P↠X with c2(P)[X]=−1 over a simply connected Riemannian 4-manifold X with negative definite intersection form ω. (Over the 4-sphere S4, this would be the quaternionic Hopf fibration S7↠S4.) After first assuming simple connectedness for b1(X)=0 in Template:Harv, he expanded the proof to also work without it in Template:Harv. If the intersection form ω is definite, then furthermore b2+(X)=0. According to the above formula,[11][12] the self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space ℳPSD is five-dimensional. Simon Donaldson then gave the following description of its singularities and its boundary, resulting in a bordism essential for his proof:[15]

Visualization[15][16] of the Yang–Mills moduli space used in the proof of Donaldson's theorem
  • If there are n pairs ±α∈H2(X,ℤ) to the equation ω(α,α)=⟨α2,[X]⟩=1 with the Kronecker pairing and fundamental class, then there are n singularities x1,…,xn∈ℳP+, so that ℳPSD∖{x1,…,xn} is a 5-manifold. Every such singularity xi∈ℳPSD has a neighborhood Ui⊂ℳPSD diffeomorphic to a cone over the second complex projective space ℂP2 (whose tip corresponds to the singularity).
  • There exists a neighborhood of the boundary ∂ℳPSD which is diffeomorphic to a half-open cylinder over X, meaning that ℳ‾PSD:=ℳPSD∪X yields a compactification with ∂ℳ‾PSD=X. (A similar approach also works for other negative Chern classes (or positive in the convention of The Geometry of Four-Manifolds).[17]) If additionally the cones around the singularities are removed, then ℳ‾PSD∖(U1∪…∪Un) describes a bordism between X and (ℂP2)⊔n. It is important, that all second complex projective spaces have the same orientation, since ℂP2⊔ℂP2‾ is nullbordant (as the boundary the 5-manifold ℂP2×[0,1]) and hence could be canceled out. Since the signature is invariant under bordisms and transfers disjoint unions into sums, one has σ(X)=nσ(ℂP2)=n.

Self-dual SO(3) moduli space

Ron Fintushel and Ronald J. Stern considered the self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space ℳPSD of a principal SO⁡(3)-bundle P↠X with p2(P)[X]=2 over a simply connected Riemannian 4-manifold X with negative definite intersection form ω. As before, b1(X)=0 and b1(X)=0. According to the above formula,[13][14] the self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space ℳPSD is one-dimensional.

References

  1. ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, Eq. (4.2.1)
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Naber 11, p. 352
  3. ↑ Uhlenbeck & Freed 1984, p. 10
  4. ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, Chapter 6 on p. 126
  5. ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, Proposition 5.4.1
  6. ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, 5.4.3
  7. ↑ Uhlenbeck & Freed 1984, Theorem 10.9
  8. ↑ Donaldson 1983, p. 290
  9. ↑ Donaldson 1987, Eq. (2.1)
  10. ↑ Freed & Uhlenbeck 1991, Equation (2.28)
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Freed & Uhlenbeck 1991, Between equations (2.28) and (2.29) on page 42
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, Equation (4.2.21)
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Freed & Uhlenbeck 1991, Equation (2.29) on page 42 & Equation (10.3) on page 155
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, Equation (4.2.22)
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Freed & Uhlenbeck 1984, p. 45-46
  16. ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, p. 326
  17. ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, Theorem (4.4.3)

Literature