Donaldson invariant
In differential topology in mathematics, Donaldson invariants are invariants of the smooth structure of four-dimensional smooth manifolds (short 4-manifolds) based on the methods behind Donaldson's theorem. In particular, key informations are obtained from the Yang–Mills moduli space of the Yang–Mills equations on the 4-manifold, which as partial differential equations depend on the smooth structure. Donaldson invariants can distinguish these, hence are able to detect exotic smooth structures, meaning explicitly that homeomorphic smooth 4-manifolds, hence identical from a topological perspective, can nonetheless have different Donaldson invariants. Donaldson invariants are named after Simon Donaldson, who first described Donaldson's theorem in 1983[1] (with improvement in 1987[2]) and the resulting invariants in 1986. He was also awarded a Fields Medal for his contributions in 1986.[3]
History


In 1983[1] (with later improvement in 1987[2]), Simon Donaldson proved Donaldson's theorem with the unexpected strategy of using the (anti) self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space ((A)SDYM moduli space) of principal SU(2)-bundles, hence with the special unitary group as structure group. In 1984, Ronald Fintushel und Ronald Stern adapted his work to principal SO(3)-bundles,[6] hence with the special orthogonal group as structure group. Both groups are connected by a double cover , exactly the adjoint representation, alternatively phrased one has the third spin group and the second projective unitary group . In 1986, Simon Donaldson expanded his work into invariants about the smooth structure of smooth manifolds, which work with both structure groups and . In 1988, Edward Witten opened up the field of topological quantum field theories (TQFT)[5] and showed, that Donaldson invariants can be expressed as the expectation values of a topologically twisted N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory (TT D = 4 N = 2 SYM).
In early 1994, Peter Kronheimer and Tomasz Mrowka achieved a strong simplification of Donaldson invariants with the introduction of Kronheimer–Mrowka basic classes,[7][8] which reduced its infinite sums to finite sums. In late 1994, Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten constructed the dual TT N = 2 SYM.[9][10][11][12] Both this gauge theory as well as its application to four-dimensional geometry are often referred to as Seiberg–Witten theory, but strictly speaking are two different theories. Seiberg–Witten invariants brought multiple improvements over Donaldson invariants, mainly due to the easier and furthermore abelian unitary group as structure group or the always compact Seiberg–Witten moduli space, with made laborious compactifications using Uhlenbeck's compactness theorem required for Donaldson invariants obsolete. Despite that, it could be shown in the following years that Seiberg–Witten invariants still contain more information than Donaldson invariants, so the latter are not used as actively any more. In particular, Clifford Taubes described a connection to Gromov–Witten invariants and Edward Witten concluded from purely physical arguments the Witten conjecture, that Kronheimer–Mrowka basic classes and therefore Donaldson invariants can be fully obtained from Seiberg–Witten theory.[13]
By now, also topologically twisted four-dimensional N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theories (TT D = 4 N = 4 SYM) are considered, including Donaldson–Witten theory, Vafa–Witten theory and Kapustin–Witten theory, with other variants like three-dimensional Rozansky–Witten theory. From these, further invariants like Vafa–Witten invariants and Rozansky–Witten invariants arise, with current research trying to determine how they expand and improve the original idea of Donaldson invariants.
SU(2) Donaldson invariants
Let be an oriented closed smooth 4-manifold and be a principal SU(2)-bundle, then there exists a unique homotopy class represented by a classifying map into the classifying space for SU(2) giving a pullback . With the Kronecker pairing and the fundamental class from the orientation, the second Chern class concretely gives a group isomorphism:
Let be the configuration space of connections on , which is an affine vector space not canonically isomorphic to . Let be the gauge group of gauge transformations of , which acts on . Let be the orbit space,[14][15] then there is a weak homotopy equivalence in the homotopy class of the classifying map of .[16][17] Currying it corresponds to a map and through pullback a principal -bundle .[18] For every gauge class , one has . With the second Chern class , the slant product yields a map:[19][20][21][15]

With the subset of an (anti) self-dual Yang–Mills moduli space there is an induced map , which through postcomposition yields a map . With the interpretation of the homology classes as embedded surfaces with and the interpretation of the cohomology classes as differential forms of second order using de Rham cohomology , one can see the map as mapping embedded surfaces in to differential forms of second order in . Donaldson invariants are defined using the integration of these differential forms, which is disrupted by the missing compatness and the singularities of the moduli space. A compactification can be constructed using Uhlenbeck's compactness theorem and leads to a -linear map .[24]
Let be the unique principal -bundle with according to the above group isomorphism, then for the first Pontrjagin class of the adjoint vector bundle and the virtual dimension of its anti self-dual Yang–Mills (ASDYM) moduli space is given with the Atiyah–Singer index theorem by:[25][26][27]
If is odd, then the virtual dimension is an even number ,[27] potentially negative given the choice of . With a fundamental class since the ASDYM moduli space is orientable, the Donaldson invariant is given with the cup product and the Kronecker pairing:[27][26]
Considering the second homology classes in a symmetric setting only up to permutation comes from the symmetry of the cup product, hence the irrelevance of any order. It can furthermore be shown, that the Donaldson invariants also don't depend on the Riemannian metric and therefore only on the smooth structure.
Change of instanton number
According to the above formula, holds under a change of the instanton number, expanding the input of the Donaldson invariant by four new second homology classes. More generally, the slant product yields a -linear map ,[21][28][29] so for connected with a map . Hence one can also expand the Donaldson invariant by two images of a generator.
SO(3) Donaldson invariants
Let be a principal SO(3)-bundle, then there exists a unique homotopy class represented by a classifying map into the classifying space for SO(3) giving a pullback . Now the second Stiefel–Whitney class and the first Pontrjagin class give a group isomorphism:
In this case, the first Pontrjagin class replaces the second Chern class in the slant product.
Donaldson invariants of compactification
Compactification to two dimensions
According to the classification of surfaces, every oriented closed 2-manifold (surface) is homeomorphic to a Sigma surface , given as a connected sum of 2-tori with the convention . Now the Donaldson invariants can be considered on the 4-manifold .
Compactification to three dimensions
For an oriented closed 3-manifold , one can consider the Donaldson invariants on the 4-manifold . For general structure groups, they relate to the Rozansky–Witten invariants of and for the structure group , they relate to the Casson–Walker–Lescop invariant of .
Literature
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite web
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Scorpan 05, p. 356
- ↑ Naber 2011, p. 362-363
- ↑ Naber 2011, p. 398-400
- ↑ Donaldson 86, Eq. (2.1)
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Naber 2011, p. 352-355
- ↑ Donaldson 86, Lem. (2.4)
- ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 97, Prop. 5.1.4
- ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 97, Eq. (5.1.5)
- ↑ Donaldson 86, Def. 2.5
- ↑ Freed & Uhlenbeck 91, p. xi-xii
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Donaldson & Kronheimer 97, p. 176-177
- ↑ Freed & Uhlenbeck 1984, p. 45-46
- ↑ Donaldson & Kronheimer 1990, p. 326
- ↑ Naber 2011, p. 352-355
- ↑ Salamon 99, p. 262-265
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 Scorpan 05, p. 355
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 Naber 2011, p. 352-355
- ↑ Salamon 99, p. 262-265
- ↑ Scorpan 05, p. 355