Macbeath region

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

The Macbeath region around a point x in a convex body K and the scaled Macbeath region around a point x in a convex body K

In mathematics, a Macbeath region is an explicitly defined region in convex analysis on a bounded convex subset of d-dimensional Euclidean space d. The idea was introduced by Template:Harvs[1] and dubbed by G. Ewald, D. G. Larman and C. A. Rogers in 1970.[2] Macbeath regions have been used to solve certain complex problems in the study of the boundaries of convex bodies.[3] Recently they have been used in the study of convex approximations and other aspects of computational geometry.[4][5]

Definition

Let K be a bounded convex set in a Euclidean space. Given a point x and a scaler λ the λ-scaled the Macbeath region around a point x is:

MK(x)=K(2xK)=x+((Kx)(xK))={kK|kK and kx=xk}

The scaled Macbeath region at x is defined as:

MKλ(x)=x+λ((Kx)(xK))={(1λ)x+λk|kK,kK and kx=xk}

This can be seen to be the intersection of K with the reflection of K around x scaled by λ.

Example uses

  • Macbeath regions can be used to create ϵ approximations, with respect to the Hausdorff distance, of convex shapes within a factor of O(logd+12(1ϵ)) combinatorial complexity of the lower bound.[5]
  • Macbeath regions can be used to approximate balls in the Hilbert metric, e.g. given any convex K, containing an x and a 0λ<1 then:[4][6]
BH(x,12ln(1+λ))Mλ(x)BH(x,12ln1+λ1λ)
  • Dikin’s Method

Properties

  • The MKλ(x) is centrally symmetric around x.
  • Macbeath regions are convex sets.
  • If x,yK and M12(x)M12(y) then M1(y)M5(x).[3][4] Essentially if two Macbeath regions intersect, you can scale one of them up to contain the other.
  • If some convex K in Rd containing both a ball of radius r and a half-space H, with the half-space disjoint from the ball, and the cap KH of our convex set has a width less than or equal to r2, we get KHM3d(x) for x, the center of gravity of K in the bounding hyper-plane of H.[3]
  • Given a convex body KRd in canonical form, then any cap of K with width at most 16d then CM3d(x), where x is the centroid of the base of the cap.[5]
  • Given a convex K and some constant λ>0, then for any point x in a cap C of K we know Mλ(x)KC1+λ. In particular when λ1, we get Mλ(x)C1+λ.[5]
  • Given a convex body K, and a cap C of K, if x is in K and CM(x) we get M(x)C2.[5]
  • Given a small ϵ>0 and a convex KRd in canonical form, there exists some collection of O(1ϵd12) centrally symmetric disjoint convex bodies R1,....,Rk and caps C1,....,Ck such that for some constant β and λ depending on d we have:[5]
    • Each Ci has width βϵ, and RiCiRiλ
    • If C is any cap of width ϵ there must exist an i so that RiC and Ci1β2CCi

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading