Koopman–von Neumann classical mechanics

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Sidebar with collapsible lists The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) theory is a description of classical mechanics as an operatorial theory similar to quantum mechanics, based on a Hilbert space of complex, square-integrable wavefunctions. As its name suggests, the KvN theory is related to work[1][2]Template:Rp by Bernard Koopman and John von Neumann.

History

Template:Primary sources Statistical mechanics describes macroscopic systems in terms of statistical ensembles, such as the macroscopic properties of an ideal gas. Ergodic theory is a branch of mathematics arising from the study of statistical mechanics.

The origins of the Koopman–von Neumann theory are tightly connected with the riseTemplate:When of ergodic theory as an independent branch of mathematics, in particular with Ludwig Boltzmann's ergodic hypothesis.

In 1931, Koopman observed that the phase space of the classical system can be converted into a Hilbert space.[3] According to this formulation, functions representing physical observables become vectors, with an inner product defined in terms of a natural integration rule over the system's probability density on phase space. This reformulation makes it possible to draw interesting conclusions about the evolution of physical observables from Stone's theorem, which had been proved shortly before. This finding inspired von Neumann to apply the novel formalism to the ergodic problem in 1932.[4][5] Subsequently, he published several seminal results in modern ergodic theory, including the proof of his mean ergodic theorem.

The Koopman–von Neumann treatment was further developed over the time by Mário Schenberg in 1952-1953,[6][7] by Angelo Loinger in 1962,[8] by Giacomo Della Riccia and Norbert Wiener in 1966,[9] and by E. C. George Sudarshan himself in 1976.[10]

Definition and dynamics

Derivation starting from the Liouville equation

In the approach of Koopman and von Neumann (KvN), dynamics in phase space is described by a (classical) probability density, recovered from an underlying wavefunction – the Koopman–von Neumann wavefunction – as the square of its absolute value (more precisely, as the amplitude multiplied with its own complex conjugate). This stands in analogy to the Born rule in quantum mechanics. In the KvN framework, observables are represented by commuting self-adjoint operators acting on the Hilbert space of KvN wavefunctions. The commutativity physically implies that all observables are simultaneously measurable. Contrast this with quantum mechanics, where observables need not commute, which underlines the uncertainty principle, Kochen–Specker theorem, and Bell inequalities.[11]

The KvN wavefunction is postulated to evolve according to exactly the same Liouville equation as the classical probability density. From this postulate it can be shown that indeed probability density dynamics is recovered.

Template:Math proof

Derivation starting from operator axioms

Conversely, it is possible to start from operator postulates, similar to the Hilbert space axioms of quantum mechanics, and derive the equation of motion by specifying how expectation values evolve.[12]

The relevant axioms are that as in quantum mechanics (i) the states of a system are represented by normalized vectors of a complex Hilbert space, and the observables are given by self-adjoint operators acting on that space, (ii) the expectation value of an observable is obtained in the manner as the expectation value in quantum mechanics, (iii) the probabilities of measuring certain values of some observables are calculated by the Born rule, and (iv) the state space of a composite system is the tensor product of the subsystem's spaces.

Template:Math proof

These axioms allow us to recover the formalism of both classical and quantum mechanics.[12] Specifically, under the assumption that the classical position and momentum operators commute, the Liouville equation for the KvN wavefunction is recovered from averaged Newton's laws of motion. However, if the coordinate and momentum obey the canonical commutation relation, the Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics is obtained.

Template:Math proof Template:Math proof

Measurements

In the Hilbert space and operator formulation of classical mechanics, the Koopman von Neumann–wavefunction takes the form of a superposition of eigenstates, and measurement collapses the KvN wavefunction to the eigenstate which is associated the measurement result, in analogy to the wave function collapse of quantum mechanics.

However, it can be shown that for Koopman–von Neumann classical mechanics non-selective measurements leave the KvN wavefunction unchanged.[13]

KvN vs Liouville mechanics

The KvN dynamical equation (Template:EquationNote) and Liouville equation (Template:EquationNote) are first-order linear partial differential equations. One recovers Newton's laws of motion by applying the method of characteristics to either of these equations. Hence, the key difference between KvN and Liouville mechanics lies in weighting individual trajectories: Arbitrary weights, underlying the classical wave function, can be utilized in the KvN mechanics, while only positive weights, representing the probability density, are permitted in the Liouville mechanics (see this scheme).

Template:AnchorThe essential distinction between KvN and Liouville mechanics lies in weighting (coloring) individual trajectories: Any weights can be utilized in KvN mechanics, while only positive weights are allowed in Liouville mechanics. Particles move along Newtonian trajectories in both cases. (Regarding a dynamical example, see below.)

Quantum analogy

Being explicitly based on the Hilbert space language, the KvN classical mechanics adopts many techniques from quantum mechanics, for example, perturbation and diagram techniques[14] as well as functional integral methods.[15][16][17] The KvN approach is very general, and it has been extended to dissipative systems,[18] relativistic mechanics,[19] and classical field theories.[12][20][21][22]

The KvN approach is fruitful in studies on the quantum-classical correspondence[12][23][24][25][26] as it reveals that the Hilbert space formulation is not exclusively quantum mechanical.[27] Even Dirac spinors are not exceptionally quantum as they are utilized in the relativistic generalization of the KvN mechanics.[19] Similarly as the more well-known phase space formulation of quantum mechanics, the KvN approach can be understood as an attempt to bring classical and quantum mechanics into a common mathematical framework. In fact, the time evolution of the Wigner function approaches, in the classical limit, the time evolution of the KvN wavefunction of a classical particle.[19][28] However, a mathematical resemblance to quantum mechanics does not imply the presence of hallmark quantum effects. In particular, impossibility of double-slit experiment[29][30][31] and Aharonov–Bohm effect[32] are explicitly demonstrated in the KvN framework.

Template:Gallery

See also

Template:Portal

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  1. ↑ PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Trieste. Template:Cite arXiv
  2. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  3. ↑ Template:Harvb
  4. ↑ Template:Harvb
  5. ↑ Template:Harvb
  6. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  7. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  8. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  9. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  10. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  11. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Template:Cite journal
  13. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named DaniloMauro2002
  14. ↑ Template:Cite book
  15. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  16. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  17. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  18. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Template:Cite arXiv
  20. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  21. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  22. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  23. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Brumer2006
  24. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  25. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  26. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  27. ↑ Bracken, A. J. (2003). "Quantum mechanics as an approximation to classical mechanics in Hilbert space", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(23), L329.
  28. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  29. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Mauro2002
  30. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Gozzi2003
  31. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Gozzi2010
  32. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Gozzi2002
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.beta.math.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Koopman–von_Neumann_classical_mechanics&oldid=36138"