Helly's selection theorem

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, Helly's selection theorem (also called the Helly selection principle) states that a uniformly bounded sequence of monotone real functions admits a convergent subsequence. In other words, it is a sequential compactness theorem for the space of uniformly bounded monotone functions. It is named for the Austrian mathematician Eduard Helly. A more general version of the theorem asserts compactness of the space BVloc of functions locally of bounded total variation that are uniformly bounded at a point.

The theorem has applications throughout mathematical analysis. In probability theory, the result implies compactness of a tight family of measures.

Statement of the theorem

Let (fn)n ∈ N be a sequence of increasing functions mapping a real interval I into the real line R, and suppose that it is uniformly bounded: there are a,b ∈ R such that a ≤ fn ≤ b for every n  ∈  N. Then the sequence (fn)n ∈ N admits a pointwise convergent subsequence.

Proof

The proof requires the basic facts about monotonic functions: An increasing function f on an interval I has at most countably many points of discontinuity.

Step 1. Inductive Construction of a subsequence converging at discontinuities and rationals (diagonal process).

Let An={x∈I;fn(y)↛fn(x) as y→x} be the set of discontinuities of fn; each of these sets are countable by the above basic fact. The set A:=(⋃n∈ℕAn)∪(I∩ℚ) is countable, and it can be denoted as {an}n=1∞.

By the uniform boundedness of {fn}n=1∞ and the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem, there is a subsequence {fn(1)}n=1∞ such that {fn(1)(a1)}n=1∞ converges. Suppose {fn(k)}n=1∞ has been chosen such that {fn(k)(ai)}n=1∞ converges for i=1,…,k, then by uniform boundedness and Bolzano–Weierstrass, there is a subsequence {fn(k+1)}n=1∞ of {fn(k)}n=1∞ such that {fn(k)(ak+1)}n=1∞ converges, thus {fn(k+1)(ai)}n=1∞ converges for i=1,…,k+1.

Let gk=fk(k), then {gk}k=1∞ is a subsequence of {fn}n=1∞ that converges pointwise everywhere in A.

Step 2. gk converges in I except possibly in an at most countable set.

Let hk(x)=supa≤x,a∈Agk(a), then, hk(a)=gk(a) for a∈A, hk is increasing, let h(x)=lim supk→∞hk(x), then h is increasing, since supremes and limits of increasing functions are increasing, and h(a)=limk→∞gk(a) for a∈ A by Step 1. Moreover, h has at most countably many discontinuities.

We will show that gk converges at all continuities of h. Let x be a continuity of h, q,r∈ A, q<x<r, then gk(q)−h(r)≤gk(x)−h(x)≤gk(r)−h(q),hence

lim supk→∞(gk(x)−h(x))≤lim supk→∞(gk(r)−h(q))=h(r)−h(q)

h(q)−h(r)=lim infk→∞(gk(q)−h(r))≤lim infk→∞(gk(x)−h(x))

Thus,

h(q)−h(r)≤lim infk→∞(gk(x)−h(x))≤lim supk→∞(gk(x)−h(x))≤h(r)−h(q)

Since h is continuous at x, by taking the limits q↑x,r↓x, we have h(q),h(r)→h(x), thus limk→∞gk(x)=h(x)

Step 3. Choosing a subsequence of gk that converges pointwise in I

This can be done with a diagonal process similar to Step 1.

With the above steps we have constructed a subsequence of (fn)n ∈ N that converges pointwise in I.

Generalisation to BVloc

Let U be an open subset of the real line and let fn : U → R, n ∈ N, be a sequence of functions. Suppose that (fn) has uniformly bounded total variation on any W that is compactly embedded in U. That is, for all sets W ⊆ U with compact closure W̄ ⊆ U,

supn∈𝐍(‖fn‖L1(W)+‖dfndt‖L1(W))<+∞,
where the derivative is taken in the sense of tempered distributions.

Then, there exists a subsequence fnk, k ∈ N, of fn and a function f : U → R, locally of bounded variation, such that

limk→∞∫W|fnk(x)−f(x)|dx=0; [1]Template:Rp
  • and, for W compactly embedded in U,
‖dfdt‖L1(W)≤lim infk→∞‖dfnkdt‖L1(W).[1]Template:Rp

Further generalizations

There are many generalizations and refinements of Helly's theorem. The following theorem, for BV functions taking values in Banach spaces, is due to Barbu and Precupanu:

Let X be a reflexive, separable Hilbert space and let E be a closed, convex subset of X. Let Δ : X → [0, +∞) be positive-definite and homogeneous of degree one. Suppose that zn is a uniformly bounded sequence in BV([0, T]; X) with zn(t) ∈ E for all n ∈ N and t ∈ [0, T]. Then there exists a subsequence znk and functions δ, z ∈ BV([0, T]; X) such that

  • for all t ∈ [0, T],
∫[0,t)Δ(dznk)→δ(t);
  • and, for all t ∈ [0, T],
znk(t)⇀z(t)∈E;
  • and, for all 0 ≤ s < t ≤ T,
∫[s,t)Δ(dz)≤δ(t)−δ(s).

See also

References

Template:Reflist