Grothendieck category

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, a Grothendieck category is a certain kind of abelian category, introduced in Alexander Grothendieck's TΓ΄hoku paper of 1957[1] in order to develop the machinery of homological algebra for modules and for sheaves in a unified manner. The theory of these categories was further developed in Pierre Gabriel's 1962 thesis.[2]

To every algebraic variety V one can associate a Grothendieck category Qcoh(V), consisting of the quasi-coherent sheaves on V. This category encodes all the relevant geometric information about V, and V can be recovered from Qcoh(V) (the Gabriel–Rosenberg reconstruction theorem). This example gives rise to one approach to noncommutative algebraic geometry: the study of "non-commutative varieties" is then nothing but the study of (certain) Grothendieck categories.[3]

Definition

By definition, a Grothendieck category π’œ is an AB5 category with a generator. Spelled out, this means that

  • π’œ is an abelian category;
  • every (possibly infinite) family of objects in π’œ has a coproduct (also known as direct sum) in π’œ;
  • direct limits of short exact sequences are exact; this means that if a direct system of short exact sequences in π’œ is given, then the induced sequence of direct limits is a short exact sequence as well. (Direct limits are always right-exact; the important point here is that we require them to be left-exact as well.)
  • π’œ possesses a generator, i.e. there is an object G in π’œ such that Hom(G,βˆ’) is a faithful functor from π’œ to the category of sets. (In our situation, this is equivalent to saying that every object X of π’œ admits an epimorphism G(I)β†’X, where G(I) denotes a direct sum of copies of G, one for each element of the (possibly infinite) set I.)

The name "Grothendieck category" appeared neither in Grothendieck's TΓ΄hoku paper[1] nor in Gabriel's thesis;[2] it came into use in the second half of the 1960s in the work of several authors, including Jan-Erik Roos, Bo StenstrΓΆm, Ulrich Oberst, and Bodo Pareigis. (Some authors use a different definition, not requiring the existence of a generator.)

Examples

  • The prototypical example of a Grothendieck category is the category of abelian groups; the abelian group β„€ of integers is a generator.
  • More generally, given any ring R (associative, with 1, but not necessarily commutative), the category Mod(R) of all right (or alternatively: left) modules over R is a Grothendieck category; R itself is a generator.
  • Given a topological space X, the category of all sheaves of abelian groups on X is a Grothendieck category.[1] (More generally: the category of all sheaves of right R-modules on X is a Grothendieck category for any ring R.)
  • Given a ringed space (X,π’ͺX), the category of sheaves of OX-modules is a Grothendieck category.[1]
  • Given an (affine or projective) algebraic variety V (or more generally: any scheme or algebraic stack), the category Qcoh(V) of quasi-coherent sheaves on V is a Grothendieck category.[4]
  • Given a small site (C, J) (i.e. a small category C together with a Grothendieck topology J), the category of all sheaves of abelian groups on the site is a Grothendieck category.

Constructing further Grothendieck categories

  • Any category that's equivalent to a Grothendieck category is itself a Grothendieck category.
  • Given Grothendieck categories π’œ1,…,π’œπ“ƒ, the product category π’œ1Γ—β€¦Γ—π’œπ“ƒ is a Grothendieck category.
  • Given a small category π’ž and a Grothendieck category π’œ, the functor category Funct(π’ž,π’œ), consisting of all covariant functors from π’ž to π’œ, is a Grothendieck category.[1]
  • Given a small preadditive category π’ž and a Grothendieck category π’œ, the functor category Add(π’ž,π’œ) of all additive covariant functors from π’ž to π’œ is a Grothendieck category.[5]
  • If π’œ is a Grothendieck category and π’ž is a localizing subcategory of π’œ, then both π’ž and the Serre quotient category π’œ/π’ž are Grothendieck categories.[2]

Properties and theorems

Every Grothendieck category contains an injective cogenerator. For example, an injective cogenerator of the category of abelian groups is the quotient group β„š/β„€.

Every object in a Grothendieck category π’œ has an injective hull in π’œ.[1][2] This allows to construct injective resolutions and thereby the use of the tools of homological algebra in π’œ, in order to define derived functors. (Note that not all Grothendieck categories allow projective resolutions for all objects; examples are categories of sheaves of abelian groups on many topological spaces, such as on the space of real numbers.)

In a Grothendieck category, any family of subobjects (Ui) of a given object X has a supremum (or "sum") βˆ‘iUi as well as an infimum (or "intersection") ∩iUi, both of which are again subobjects of X. Further, if the family (Ui) is directed (i.e. for any two objects in the family, there is a third object in the family that contains the two), and V is another subobject of X, we have[6]

βˆ‘i(Ui∩V)=(βˆ‘iUi)∩V.

Grothendieck categories are well-powered (sometimes called locally small, although that term is also used for a different concept), i.e. the collection of subobjects of any given object forms a set (rather than a proper class).[5]

It is a rather deep result that every Grothendieck category π’œ is complete,[7] i.e. that arbitrary limits (and in particular products) exist in π’œ. By contrast, it follows directly from the definition that π’œ is co-complete, i.e. that arbitrary colimits and coproducts (direct sums) exist in π’œ. Coproducts in a Grothendieck category are exact (i.e. the coproduct of a family of short exact sequences is again a short exact sequence), but products need not be exact.

A functor F:π’œβ†’π’³ from a Grothendieck category π’œ to an arbitrary category 𝒳 has a left adjoint if and only if it commutes with all limits, and it has a right adjoint if and only if it commutes with all colimits. This follows from Peter J. Freyd's special adjoint functor theorem and its dual.[8]

The Gabriel–Popescu theorem states that any Grothendieck category π’œ is equivalent to a full subcategory of the category Mod(R) of right modules over some unital ring R (which can be taken to be the endomorphism ring of a generator of π’œ), and π’œ can be obtained as a Gabriel quotient of Mod(R) by some localizing subcategory.[9]

As a consequence of Gabriel–Popescu, one can show that every Grothendieck category is locally presentable.[10] Furthermore, Gabriel-Popescu can be used to see that every Grothendieck category is complete, being a reflective subcategory of the complete category Mod(R) for some R.

Every small abelian category π’ž can be embedded in a Grothendieck category, in the following fashion. The category π’œ:=Lex(π’žop,Ab) of left-exact additive (covariant) functors π’žopβ†’Ab (where Ab denotes the category of abelian groups) is a Grothendieck category, and the functor h:π’žβ†’π’œ, with C↦hC=Hom(βˆ’,C), is full, faithful and exact. A generator of π’œ is given by the coproduct of all hC, with Cβˆˆπ’ž.[2] The category π’œ is equivalent to the category Ind(π’ž) of ind-objects of π’ž and the embedding h corresponds to the natural embedding π’žβ†’Ind(π’ž). We may therefore view π’œ as the co-completion of π’ž.

Special kinds of objects and Grothendieck categories

An object X in a Grothendieck category is called finitely generated if, whenever X is written as the sum of a family of subobjects of X, then it is already the sum of a finite subfamily. (In the case π’œ=Mod(R) of module categories, this notion is equivalent to the familiar notion of finitely generated modules.) Epimorphic images of finitely generated objects are again finitely generated. If UβŠ†X and both U and X/U are finitely generated, then so is X. The object X is finitely generated if, and only if, for any directed system (Ai) in π’œ in which each morphism is a monomorphism, the natural morphism limHom(X,Ai)β†’Hom(X,limAi) is an isomorphism.[11] A Grothendieck category need not contain any non-zero finitely generated objects.

A Grothendieck category is called locally finitely generated if it has a set of finitely generated generators (i.e. if there exists a family (Gi)i∈I of finitely generated objects such that to every object X there exist i∈I and a non-zero morphism Giβ†’X; equivalently: X is epimorphic image of a direct sum of copies of the Gi). In such a category, every object is the sum of its finitely generated subobjects.[5] Every category π’œ=Mod(R) is locally finitely generated.

An object X in a Grothendieck category is called finitely presented if it is finitely generated and if every epimorphism Wβ†’X with finitely generated domain W has a finitely generated kernel. Again, this generalizes the notion of finitely presented modules. If UβŠ†X and both U and X/U are finitely presented, then so is X. In a locally finitely generated Grothendieck category π’œ, the finitely presented objects can be characterized as follows:[12] X in π’œ is finitely presented if, and only if, for every directed system (Ai) in π’œ, the natural morphism limHom(X,Ai)β†’Hom(X,limAi) is an isomorphism.

An object X in a Grothendieck category π’œ is called coherent if it is finitely presented and if each of its finitely generated subobjects is also finitely presented.[13] (This generalizes the notion of coherent sheaves on a ringed space.) The full subcategory of all coherent objects in π’œ is abelian and the inclusion functor is exact.[13]

An object X in a Grothendieck category is called Noetherian if the set of its subobjects satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. if every sequence X1βŠ†X2βŠ†β‹― of subobjects of X eventually becomes stationary. This is the case if and only if every subobject of X is finitely generated. (In the case π’œ=Mod(R), this notion is equivalent to the familiar notion of Noetherian modules.) A Grothendieck category is called locally Noetherian if it has a set of Noetherian generators; an example is the category of left modules over a left-Noetherian ring.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References