Dimensionless physical constant
Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Distinguish
In physics, a dimensionless physical constant is a physical constant that is dimensionless, i.e. a pure number having no units attached and having a numerical value that is independent of whatever system of units may be used.[1] These dimensionless constants appear in many physics and engineering models.[2]Template:Rp In fundamental physical models, sets of dimensionless physical constants characterize specific models.
Fundamental constants
Physicists have discussed the nature of the term fundamental physical constant, those physical constants that appear in the most fundamental physics equations. Michael Duff argues that the laws of physics should not depend on the units of measurement: only dimensionless physical constants should be used in these laws.[3] By using the system of natural units where dimensioned physical constants are all set to 1, the laws of physics will contain only dimensionless physical constants.[4] Lev Okun argues that while the laws of physics are based solely on dimensionless constants, measurements require units and the minimum set of dimensioned constants includes the speed of light, the Planck constant, and the gravitational constant.[5]
A set of fundamental dimensionless constants determine a given physical theory. Such constants cannot be explained by the theory and must be measured experimentally and verified to be constant in experiments. However such constants may be explained by a new theory with a different set of constants.[6]Template:Rp Developments in physics may lead to either a reduction or an extension of their number: discovery of new particles, or new relationships between physical phenomena, would introduce new constants, while the development of a more fundamental theory might allow the derivation of several constants from a more fundamental constant.
However, the term fundamental physical constant is also used to refer to certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the speed of light c, vacuum permittivity ε0, Planck constant h, and the Newtonian constant of gravitation G, that appear in the most basic theories of physics.[7][8][9] NIST[7] and CODATA[10] use the term in this manner.
Examples
Dimensionless fundamental physical constants include:
- α, the fine-structure constant, (≈ Template:Sfrac). This is also the square of the electron charge, expressed in Planck units, which defines the scale of charge of elementary particles with charge. The electron charge is the coupling constant for the electromagnetic interaction.
- μ or β, the proton-to-electron mass ratio (≈ Template:Physconst), the rest mass of the proton divided by that of the electron. More generally, the ratio of the rest masses of any pair of elementary particles.
- αs, the coupling constant for the strong force (≈ 1)
Fine-structure constant
One of the dimensionless fundamental constants is the fine-structure constant:
where e is the elementary charge, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The fine-structure constant is fixed to the strength of the electromagnetic force. At low energies, α ≈ Template:Sfrac, whereas at the scale of the Z boson, about Template:Val, one measures α ≈ Template:Sfrac. There is no accepted theory explaining the value of α.[11]
Standard Model
The original Standard Model of particle physics from the 1970s contained 19 fundamental dimensionless constants describing the masses of the particles and the strengths of the electroweak and strong forces. In the 1990s, neutrinos were discovered to have nonzero mass, and a quantity called the vacuum angle was found to be indistinguishable from zero.[12]Template:Rp
The complete Standard Model requires 25 fundamental dimensionless constants.[4] At present, their numerical values are not understood in terms of any widely accepted theory and are determined only from measurement. These 25 constants are:
- the fine structure constant;
- the strong coupling constant;
- fifteen masses of the fundamental particles (relative to the Planck mass mP = Template:Val), namely:
- six quarks
- six leptons
- the Higgs boson
- the W boson
- the Z boson
- four parameters of the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix, describing how quarks oscillate between different forms;
- four parameters of the Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix, which does the same thing for neutrinos.
Gravitational coupling constant
A gravitational coupling constant is a constant characterizing the gravitational attraction between a given pair of elementary particles. The electron mass is typically used, and the associated constant typically denoted Template:Math. It is a dimensionless quantity, with the result that its numerical value does not vary with the choice of units of measurement, only with the choice of particle.
The gravitational coupling constant, Template:Math, can be defined in terms of the gravitational attraction between two elementary particles:[13]
where:
- Template:Mvar is the gravitational constant;
- Template:Math is the particle rest mass;
- Template:Mvar is the speed of light in vacuum;
- Template:Mvar is the reduced Planck constant.
For a proton the value of the dimensionless constant is approximately Template:Val.[13][14]Template:Rp
In natural units where Template:Math, the expression becomes[15]Template:Rp
In 1961, a dimensionless gravitational coupling constant was used by Robert H. Dicke.[13] Dicke's work has been described as perhaps the first explicit discussion of the weak anthropic principle. This principle has various forms. The basic idea is that the constants in physical laws are limited to values which can give rise to physicists. Dicke reasoned that the gravitational coupling must be an extremely small number to ensure that expansion of the universe could continue against the force of gravity caused by all the matter in the universe.[16]Template:Rp Dicke's analysis countered an earlier hypothesis by Paul Dirac, suggesting that the gravitational coupling constant depends on cosmic density. In a Big Bang model of the universe, the density varies strongly with time. Dicke noted that sufficient time must elapse for stars to form and this requires a very small gravitational coupling constant.[15]Template:Rp
Cosmological constants
The cosmological constant, which can be thought of as the density of dark energy in the universe, is a fundamental constant in physical cosmology that has a dimensionless value of approximately 10−122.[17] Other dimensionless constants are the measure of homogeneity in the universe, denoted by Q, which is explained below by Martin Rees, the baryon mass per photon, the cold dark matter mass per photon and the neutrino mass per photon.[18]
Barrow and Tipler
Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchor their broad-ranging discussion of astrophysics, cosmology, quantum physics, teleology, and the anthropic principle in the fine-structure constant, the proton-to-electron mass ratio (which they, along with Barrow (2002), call β), and the coupling constants for the strong force and gravitation.
Martin Rees's 'six numbers'
Martin Rees, in his book Just Six Numbers,[19] mulls over the following six dimensionless constants, whose values he deems fundamental to present-day physical theory and the known structure of the universe:
- N ≈ 1036: the ratio of the electrostatic and the gravitational forces between two protons. This ratio is denoted α/αG in Barrow and Tipler (1986). N governs the relative importance of gravity and electrostatic attraction/repulsion in explaining the properties of baryonic matter;[20]
- ε ≈ 0.007: The fraction of the mass of four protons that is released as energy when fused into a helium nucleus. ε governs the energy output of stars, and is determined by the coupling constant for the strong force;[20]Template:Rp
- Ω ≈ 0.3: the ratio of the actual density of the universe to the critical (minimum) density required for the universe to eventually collapse under its gravity. Ω determines the ultimate fate of the universe. If Template:Nowrap, the universe may experience a Big Crunch. If Template:Nowrap, the universe may expand forever.[20]
- λ ≈ 0.7: The ratio of the energy density of the universe, due to the cosmological constant, to the critical density of the universe. Others denote this ratio by ;[20]Template:Rp
- Q ≈ 10−5: The energy required to break up and disperse an instance of the largest known structures in the universe, namely a galactic cluster or supercluster, expressed as a fraction of the energy equivalent to the rest mass m of that structure, namely mc2;[20]Template:Rp
- D = 3: the number of macroscopic spatial dimensions.
Any plausible fundamental physical theory must be consistent with these six constants, and must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept their values as empirical.
History
In the 1920s and 1930s, Arthur Eddington embarked upon extensive mathematical investigation into the relations between the fundamental quantities in basic physical theories, later used as part of his effort to construct an overarching theory unifying quantum mechanics and cosmological physics. For example, he speculated on the potential consequences of the ratio of the electron radius to its mass. Most notably, in a 1929 paper he set out an argument based on the Pauli exclusion principle and the Dirac equation that fixed the value of the reciprocal of the fine-structure constant as 𝛼−1 = 16 + Template:Sfrac × 16 × (16–1) = 136. When its value was discovered to be closer to 137, he changed his argument to match that value. His ideas were not widely accepted, and subsequent experiments have shown that they were wrong (for example, none of the measurements of the fine-structure constant suggest an integer value; the modern CODATA value is Template:Physconst
Eddington may have been the first to attempt in vain to derive the basic dimensionless constants from fundamental theories and equations, but he was certainly not the last. Many others would subsequently undertake similar endeavors, and efforts occasionally continue even today. None have yet produced convincing results or gained wide acceptance among theoretical physicists.[21][22]
An empirical relation between the masses of the electron, muon and tau has been discovered by physicist Yoshio Koide, but this formula remains unexplained.[23]
See also
- Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix (Cabibbo angle)
- Dimensionless numbers in fluid mechanics
- Dirac large numbers hypothesis
- Neutrino oscillation
- Physical cosmology
- Standard Model
- Weinberg angle
- Fine-tuned universe
- Koide formula
References
External articles
- General
- Template:Citation
- Template:BarrowTipler1986
- Template:Citation
- Fundamental Physical Constants from NIST
- Values of fundamental constants. CODATA, 2002.
- Simon Plouffe, 2004, "A search for a mathematical expression for mass ratios using a large database. Template:Webarchive"
- Articles on variance of the fundamental constants
- Template:Cite journal
- John D. Barrow and Webb, J. K., "Inconstant Constants – Do the inner workings of nature change with time?" Scientific American (June 2005).
- Michael Duff, 2002 "Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants."
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Stroke, H. H., ed., The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1995), p. 525.
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite encyclopedia
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Quint, W., & M. Vogel, Fundamental Physics in Particle Traps (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2014), pp. 293–296.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Jaffe, R. L., & Taylor, W., The Physics of Energy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), p. 419.
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Radford, T., "Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe by Martin Rees—review", The Guardian, 8 June 2012.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite arXiv
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite arXiv