Alexander–Spanier cohomology

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, particularly in algebraic topology, Alexander–Spanier cohomology is a cohomology theory for topological spaces.

History

It was introduced by Template:Harvs for the special case of compact metric spaces, and by Template:Harvs for all topological spaces, based on a suggestion of Alexander D. Wallace.

Definition

If X is a topological space and G is an R-module where R is a ring with unity, then there is a cochain complex C whose p-th term Cp is the set of all functions from Xp+1 to G with differential d:Cp−1→Cp given by

df(x0,…,xp)=∑i(−1)if(x0,…,xi−1,xi+1,…,xp).

The defined cochain complex C∗(X;G) does not rely on the topology of X. In fact, if X is a nonempty space, G≃H∗(C∗(X;G)) where G is a graded module whose only nontrivial module is G at degree 0.[1]

An element φ∈Cp(X) is said to be locally zero if there is a covering {U} of X by open sets such that φ vanishes on any (p+1)-tuple of X which lies in some element of {U} (i.e. φ vanishes on ⋃U∈{U}Up+1). The subset of Cp(X) consisting of locally zero functions is a submodule, denote by C0p(X). C0∗(X)={C0p(X),d} is a cochain subcomplex of C∗(X) so we define a quotient cochain complex C¯∗(X)=C∗(X)/C0∗(X). The Alexander–Spanier cohomology groups H¯p(X,G) are defined to be the cohomology groups of C¯∗(X).

Induced homomorphism

Given a function f:X→Y which is not necessarily continuous, there is an induced cochain map

f♯:C∗(Y;G)→C∗(X;G)

defined by (f♯φ)(x0,...,xp)=(φf)(x0,...,xp), φ∈Cp(Y); x0,...,xp∈X

If f is continuous, there is an induced cochain map

f♯:C¯∗(Y;G)→C¯∗(X;G)

Relative cohomology module

If A is a subspace of X and i:A↪X is an inclusion map, then there is an induced epimorphism i♯:C¯∗(X;G)→C¯∗(A;G). The kernel of i♯ is a cochain subcomplex of C¯∗(X;G) which is denoted by C¯∗(X,A;G). If C∗(X,A) denote the subcomplex of C∗(X) of functions φ that are locally zero on A, then C¯∗(X,A)=C∗(X,A)/C0∗(X).

The relative module is H¯∗(X,A;G) is defined to be the cohomology module of C¯∗(X,A;G).

H¯q(X,A;G) is called the Alexander cohomology module of (X,A) of degree q with coefficients G and this module satisfies all cohomology axioms. The resulting cohomology theory is called the Alexander (or Alexander-Spanier) cohomology theory

Cohomology theory axioms

  • (Dimension axiom) If X is a one-point space, G≃H¯∗(X;G)
  • (Exactness axiom) If (X,A) is a topological pair with inclusion maps i:A↪X and j:X↪(X,A), there is an exact sequence ⋯→H¯q(X,A;G)→j∗H¯q(X;G)→i∗H¯q(A;G)→δ∗H¯q+1(X,A;G)→⋯
  • (Excision axiom) For topological pair (X,A), if U is an open subset of X such that U¯⊂int⁡A, then C¯∗(X,A)≃C¯∗(X−U,A−U).
  • (Homotopy axiom) If f0,f1:(X,A)→(Y,B) are homotopic, then f0∗=f1∗:H∗(Y,B;G)→H∗(X,A;G)

Alexander cohomology with compact supports

A subset B⊂X is said to be cobounded if X−B is bounded, i.e. its closure is compact.

Similar to the definition of Alexander cohomology module, one can define Alexander cohomology module with compact supports of a pair (X,A) by adding the property that φ∈Cq(X,A;G) is locally zero on some cobounded subset of X.

Formally, one can define as follows : For given topological pair (X,A), the submodule Ccq(X,A;G) of Cq(X,A;G) consists of φ∈Cq(X,A;G) such that φ is locally zero on some cobounded subset of X.

Similar to the Alexander cohomology module, one can get a cochain complex Cc∗(X,A;G)={Ccq(X,A;G),δ} and a cochain complex C¯c∗(X,A;G)=Cc∗(X,A;G)/C0∗(X;G).

The cohomology module induced from the cochain complex C¯c∗ is called the Alexander cohomology of (X,A) with compact supports and denoted by H¯c∗(X,A;G). Induced homomorphism of this cohomology is defined as the Alexander cohomology theory.

Under this definition, we can modify homotopy axiom for cohomology to a proper homotopy axiom if we define a coboundary homomorphism δ∗:H¯cq(A;G)→H¯cq+1(X,A;G) only when A⊂X is a closed subset. Similarly, excision axiom can be modified to proper excision axiom i.e. the excision map is a proper map.[2]

Property

One of the most important property of this Alexander cohomology module with compact support is the following theorem:

Example

H¯cq(ℝn;G)≃{0q≠nGq=n

as (ℝn)+≅Sn. Hence if n≠m, ℝn and ℝm are not of the same proper homotopy type.

Relation with tautness

  • From the fact that a closed subspace of a paracompact Hausdorff space is a taut subspace relative to the Alexander cohomology theory[3] and the first Basic property of tautness, if B⊂A⊂X where X is a paracompact Hausdorff space and A and B are closed subspaces of X, then (A,B) is taut pair in X relative to the Alexander cohomology theory.

Using this tautness property, one can show the following two facts:[4]

  • (Strong excision property) Let (X,A) and (Y,B) be pairs with X and Y paracompact Hausdorff and A and B closed. Let f:(X,A)→(Y,B) be a closed continuous map such that f induces a one-to-one map of X−A onto Y−B. Then for all q and all G, f∗:H¯q(Y,B;G)→∼H¯q(X,A;G)
  • (Weak continuity property) Let {(Xα,Aα)}α be a family of compact Hausdorff pairs in some space, directed downward by inclusion, and let (X,A)=(⋂Xα,⋂Aα). The inclusion maps iα:(X,A)→(Xα,Aα) induce an isomorphism
    {iα∗}:lim→H¯q(Xα,Aα;M)→∼H¯q(X,A;M).

Difference from singular cohomology theory

Recall that the singular cohomology module of a space is the direct product of the singular cohomology modules of its path components.

A nonempty space X is connected if and only if G≃H¯0(X;G). Hence for any connected space which is not path connected, singular cohomology and Alexander cohomology differ in degree 0.

If {Uj} is an open covering of X by pairwise disjoint sets, then there is a natural isomorphism H¯q(X;G)≃∏jH¯q(Uj;G).[5] In particular, if {Cj} is the collection of components of a locally connected space X, there is a natural isomorphism H¯q(X;G)≃∏jH¯q(Cj;G).

Variants

It is also possible to define Alexander–Spanier homologyTemplate:Sfn and Alexander–Spanier cohomology with compact supports. Template:Harv

Connection to other cohomologies

The Alexander–Spanier cohomology groups coincide with Čech cohomology groups for compact Hausdorff spaces, and coincide with singular cohomology groups for locally finite complexes.

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography