Vlasov equation

Template:Short description In plasma physics, the Vlasov equation is a differential equation describing time evolution of the distribution function of collisionless plasma consisting of charged particles with long-range interaction, such as the Coulomb interaction. The equation was first suggested for the description of plasma by Anatoly Vlasov in 1938 and later discussed by him in detail in a monograph. The Vlasov equation, combined with Landau kinetic equation describe collisional plasma.

Difficulties of the standard kinetic approach

First, Vlasov argues that the standard kinetic approach based on the Boltzmann equation has difficulties when applied to a description of the plasma with long-range Coulomb interaction. He mentions the following problems arising when applying the kinetic theory based on pair collisions to plasma dynamics:

1. Theory of pair collisions disagrees with the discovery by Rayleigh, Irving Langmuir and Lewi Tonks of natural vibrations in electron plasma.
2. Theory of pair collisions is formally not applicable to Coulomb interaction due to the divergence of the kinetic terms.
3. Theory of pair collisions cannot explain experiments by Harrison Merrill and Harold Webb on anomalous electron scattering in gaseous plasma.

Vlasov suggests that these difficulties originate from the long-range character of Coulomb interaction. He starts with the collisionless Boltzmann equation (sometimes called the Vlasov equation, anachronistically in this context), in generalized coordinates: $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}f(𝐫,𝐩,t)=0,$$

explicitly a PDE: $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\frac{\mathrm{d}𝐫}{\mathrm{d}t}\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial 𝐫}+\frac{\mathrm{d}𝐩}{\mathrm{d}t}\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial 𝐩}=0,$$ and adapted it to the case of a plasma, leading to the systems of equations shown below. Here Template:Math is a general distribution function of particles with momentum Template:Math at coordinates Template:Math and given time Template:Mvar. Note that the term $\frac{\mathrm{d}𝐩}{\mathrm{d}t}$ is the force Template:Math acting on the particle.

The Vlasov–Maxwell system of equations (Gaussian units)

Instead of collision-based kinetic description for interaction of charged particles in plasma, Vlasov utilizes a self-consistent collective field created by the charged plasma particles. Such a description uses distribution functions $f_e(𝐫,𝐩,t)$ and $f_i(𝐫,𝐩,t)$ for electrons and (positive) plasma ions. The distribution function $f_{\alpha }(𝐫,𝐩,t)$ for species Template:Mvar describes the number of particles of the species Template:Mvar having approximately the momentum $𝐩$ near the position $𝐫$ at time Template:Mvar. Instead of the Boltzmann equation, the following system of equations was proposed for description of charged components of plasma (electrons and positive ions): $$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial f_e}{\partial t}+{𝐯}_e\cdot \mathrm{\nabla }{f}_e-e(𝐄+\frac{{𝐯}_e}{c}\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f_e}{\partial 𝐩}& =0\\ \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial t}+{𝐯}_i\cdot \mathrm{\nabla }{f}_i+Z_{i}e(𝐄+\frac{{𝐯}_i}{c}\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial 𝐩}& =0\end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{cccc}\mathrm{\nabla }\times 𝐁& =\frac{4\pi }{c}𝐣+\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial 𝐄}{\partial t},& \mathrm{\nabla }\cdot 𝐁& =0,\\ \mathrm{\nabla }\times 𝐄& =-\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial 𝐁}{\partial t},& \mathrm{\nabla }\cdot 𝐄& =4\pi \rho ,\end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{cc}\rho & =e\int (Z_i{f}_i-f_e){\mathrm{d}}^3𝐩,\\ 𝐣& =e\int (Z_i{f}_i{𝐯}_i-f_e{𝐯}_e){\mathrm{d}}^3𝐩,\\ {𝐯}_{\alpha }& =\frac{𝐩/m_{\alpha }}{\sqrt{1+p^2/{\left(m_{\alpha }c\right)}^2}}\end{array}$$

Here Template:Mvar is the elementary charge ($e>0$), Template:Mvar is the speed of light, Template:Mvar is the mass of the ion, $𝐄(𝐫,t)$ and $𝐁(𝐫,t)$ represent collective self-consistent electromagnetic field created in the point $𝐫$ at time moment Template:Mvar by all plasma particles. The essential difference of this system of equations from equations for particles in an external electromagnetic field is that the self-consistent electromagnetic field depends in a complex way on the distribution functions of electrons and ions $f_e(𝐫,𝐩,t)$ and $f_i(𝐫,𝐩,t)$.

The Vlasov–Poisson equation

The Vlasov–Poisson equations are an approximation of the Vlasov–Maxwell equations in the non-relativistic zero-magnetic field limit: $$\frac{\partial f_{\alpha }}{\partial t}+{𝐯}_{\alpha }\cdot \frac{\partial f_{\alpha }}{\partial 𝐱}+\frac{q_{\alpha }𝐄}{m_{\alpha }}\cdot \frac{\partial f_{\alpha }}{\partial 𝐯}=0,$$

and Poisson's equation for self-consistent electric field: $${\mathrm{\nabla }}^2\varphi +\frac{\rho }{\epsilon }=0.$$

Here Template:Mvar is the particle's electric charge, Template:Mvar is the particle's mass, $𝐄(𝐱,t)$ is the self-consistent electric field, $\varphi (𝐱,t)$ the self-consistent electric potential, Template:Mvar is the electric charge density, and $\epsilon$ is the electric permitivity.

Vlasov–Poisson equations are used to describe various phenomena in plasma, in particular Landau damping and the distributions in a double layer plasma, where they are necessarily strongly non-Maxwellian, and therefore inaccessible to fluid models.

Moment equations

In fluid descriptions of plasmas (see plasma modeling and magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)) one does not consider the velocity distribution. This is achieved by replacing $f(𝐫,𝐯,t)$ with plasma moments such as number density Template:Mvar, flow velocity Template:Math and pressure Template:Math. They are named plasma moments because the Template:Mvar-th moment of $f$ can be found by integrating $v^{n}f$ over velocity. These variables are only functions of position and time, which means that some information is lost. In multifluid theory, the different particle species are treated as different fluids with different pressures, densities and flow velocities. The equations governing the plasma moments are called the moment or fluid equations.

Below the two most used moment equations are presented (in SI units). Deriving the moment equations from the Vlasov equation requires no assumptions about the distribution function.

Continuity equation

The continuity equation describes how the density changes with time. It can be found by integration of the Vlasov equation over the entire velocity space. $$\int \frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}t}{\mathrm{d}}^{3}v=\int (\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+(𝐯\cdot {\mathrm{\nabla }}_r)f+(𝐚\cdot {\mathrm{\nabla }}_v)f){\mathrm{d}}^{3}v=0$$

After some calculations, one ends up with $$\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}+\mathrm{\nabla }\cdot (n𝐮)=0.$$

The number density Template:Mvar, and the momentum density Template:Math, are zeroth and first order moments: $$n=\int f{\mathrm{d}}^{\mathrm{3}}v$$ $$n𝐮=\int 𝐯f{\mathrm{d}}^{3}v$$

Momentum equation

The rate of change of momentum of a particle is given by the Lorentz equation: $$m\frac{\mathrm{d}𝐯}{\mathrm{d}t}=q(𝐄+𝐯\times 𝐁)$$

By using this equation and the Vlasov Equation, the momentum equation for each fluid becomes $$mn\frac{\mathrm{D}}{\mathrm{D}t}𝐮=-\mathrm{\nabla }\cdot 𝒫+qn𝐄+qn𝐮\times 𝐁,$$ where $𝒫$ is the pressure tensor. The material derivative is $$\frac{\mathrm{D}}{\mathrm{D}t}=\frac{\partial }{\partial t}+𝐮\cdot \mathrm{\nabla }.$$

The pressure tensor is defined as the particle mass times the covariance matrix of the velocity: $$p_{ij}=m\int (v_i-u_i)(v_j-u_j)f{\mathrm{d}}^{3}v.$$

The frozen-in approximation

Template:Further Template:Unreferenced section As for ideal MHD, the plasma can be considered as tied to the magnetic field lines when certain conditions are fulfilled. One often says that the magnetic field lines are frozen into the plasma. The frozen-in conditions can be derived from Vlasov equation.

We introduce the scales Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar for time, distance and speed respectively. They represent magnitudes of the different parameters which give large changes in $f$. By large we mean that $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}T\sim f\left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial 𝐫}\right|L\sim f\left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial 𝐯}\right|V\sim f.$$

We then write $$t^{\prime }=\frac{t}{T},{𝐫}^{\prime }=\frac{𝐫}{L},{𝐯}^{\prime }=\frac{𝐯}{V}.$$

Vlasov equation can now be written $$\frac{1}{T}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t^{\prime }}+\frac{V}{L}{𝐯}^{\prime }\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐫}^{\prime }}+\frac{q}{mV}(𝐄+V{𝐯}^{\prime }\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}^{\prime }}=0.$$

So far no approximations have been done. To be able to proceed we set $V=R{\omega }_g$, where ${\omega }_g=qB/m$ is the gyro frequency and Template:Mvar is the gyroradius. By dividing by Template:Mvar, we get $$\frac{1}{{\omega }_{g}T}\frac{\partial f}{\partial t^{\prime }}+\frac{R}{L}{𝐯}^{\prime }\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐫}^{\prime }}+(\frac{𝐄}{VB}+{𝐯}^{\prime }\times \frac{𝐁}{B})\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}^{\prime }}=0$$

If $1/{\omega }_g\ll T$ and $R\ll L$, the two first terms will be much less than $f$ since $\partial f/\partial t^{\prime }\sim f,v^{\prime }\lesssim 1$ and $\partial f/\partial {𝐫}^{\prime }\sim f$ due to the definitions of Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar above. Since the last term is of the order of $f$, we can neglect the two first terms and write $$(\frac{𝐄}{VB}+{𝐯}^{\prime }\times \frac{𝐁}{B})\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}^{\prime }}\approx 0\Rightarrow (𝐄+𝐯\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial 𝐯}\approx 0$$

This equation can be decomposed into a field aligned and a perpendicular part: $${𝐄}_{\parallel }\frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}_{\parallel }}+({𝐄}_{\perp }+𝐯\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}_{\perp }}\approx 0$$

The next step is to write $𝐯={𝐯}_0+\Delta 𝐯$, where $${𝐯}_0\times 𝐁=-{𝐄}_{\perp }$$

It will soon be clear why this is done. With this substitution, we get $${𝐄}_{\parallel }\frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}_{\parallel }}+(\Delta {𝐯}_{\perp }\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}_{\perp }}\approx 0$$

If the parallel electric field is small, $$(\Delta {𝐯}_{\perp }\times 𝐁)\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial {𝐯}_{\perp }}\approx 0$$

This equation means that the distribution is gyrotropic. The mean velocity of a gyrotropic distribution is zero. Hence, ${𝐯}_0$ is identical with the mean velocity, Template:Math, and we have $$𝐄+𝐮\times 𝐁\approx 0$$

To summarize, the gyro period and the gyro radius must be much smaller than the typical times and lengths which give large changes in the distribution function. The gyro radius is often estimated by replacing Template:Mvar with the thermal velocity or the Alfvén velocity. In the latter case Template:Mvar is often called the inertial length. The frozen-in conditions must be evaluated for each particle species separately. Because electrons have much smaller gyro period and gyro radius than ions, the frozen-in conditions will more often be satisfied.

See also

• Fokker–Planck equation

Further reading

• Template:Cite journal