Van Vleck paramagnetism

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In condensed matter and atomic physics, Van Vleck paramagnetism refers to a positive and temperature-independent contribution to the magnetic susceptibility of a material, derived from second order corrections to the Zeeman interaction. The quantum mechanical theory was developed by John Hasbrouck Van Vleck between the 1920s and the 1930s to explain the magnetic response of gaseous nitric oxide (Template:Chem) and of rare-earth salts.[1][2][3][4] Alongside other magnetic effects like Paul Langevin's formulas for paramagnetism (Curie's law) and diamagnetism, Van Vleck discovered an additional paramagnetic contribution of the same order as Langevin's diamagnetism. Van Vleck contribution is usually important for systems with one electron short of being half filled and this contribution vanishes for elements with closed shells.[5][6]

Description

The magnetization of a material under an external small magnetic field ๐‡ is approximately described by

๐Œ=χ๐‡

where χ is the magnetic susceptibility. When a magnetic field is applied to a paramagnetic material, its magnetization is parallel to the magnetic field and χ>0. For a diamagnetic material, the magnetization opposes the field, and χ<0.

Experimental measurements show that most non-magnetic materials have a susceptibility that behaves in the following way:

χ(T)C0T+χ0,

where T is the absolute temperature; C0,χ0 are constant, and C00, while χ0 can be positive, negative or null. Van Vleck paramagnetism often refers to systems where C00 and χ0>0.

Derivation

The Hamiltonian for an electron in a static homogeneous magnetic field ๐‡ in an atom is usually composed of three terms

โ„‹=โ„‹0+μ0μB(๐‹+g๐’)๐‡+μ02e28mer2H2

where μ0 is the vacuum permeability, μB is the Bohr magneton, g is the g-factor, e is the elementary charge, me is the electron mass, ๐‹ is the orbital angular momentum operator, ๐’ the spin and r is the component of the position operator orthogonal to the magnetic field. The Hamiltonian has three terms, the first one โ„‹0 is the unperturbed Hamiltonian without the magnetic field, the second one is proportional to ๐‡, and the third one is proportional to H2. In order to obtain the ground state of the system, one can treat โ„‹0 exactly, and treat the magnetic field dependent terms using perturbation theory. Note that for strong magnetic fields, Paschen-Back effect dominates.

First order perturbation theory

First order perturbation theory on the second term of the Hamiltonian (proportional to H) for electrons bound to an atom, gives a positive correction to energy given by

ΔE(1)=μ0μBg|(๐‹+g๐’)๐‡|g=gJμ0μBg|๐‰๐‡|g

where |g is the ground state, gJ is the Landรฉ g-factor of the ground state and ๐‰=๐‹+๐’ is the total angular momentum operator (see Wignerโ€“Eckart theorem). This correction leads to what is known as Langevin paramagnetism (the quantum theory is sometimes called Brillouin paramagnetism), that leads to a positive magnetic susceptibility. For sufficiently large temperatures, this contribution is described by Curie's law:

χCurieC1T,

a susceptibility that is inversely proportional to the temperature T, where C0C1 is the material dependent Curie constant. If the ground state has no total angular momentum there is no Curie contribution and other terms dominate.

The first perturbation theory on the third term of the Hamiltonian (proportional to H2), leads to a negative response (magnetization that opposes the magnetic field). Usually known as Larmor or Langenvin diamagnetism:

χLarmor=C2r2

where C2 is another constant proportional to n the number of atoms per unit volume, and r2 is the mean squared radius of the atom. Note that Larmor susceptibility does not depend on the temperature.

Second order: Van Vleck susceptibility

While Curie and Larmor susceptibilities were well understood from experimental measurements, J.H. Van Vleck noticed that the calculation above was incomplete. If H is taken as the perturbation parameter, the calculation must include all orders of perturbation up to the same power of H. As Larmor diamagnetism comes from first order perturbation of the H2, one must calculate second order perturbation of the B term:

ΔE(2)=(μ0μB)2i|g|(๐‹+g๐’)๐‡|ei|2Eg(0)Ee,i(0)

where the sum goes over all excited degenerate states |ei, and Ee,i(0),Eg(0) are the energies of the excited states and the ground state, respectively, the sum excludes the state i=0, where |e0=|g. Historically, J.H. Van Vleck called this term the "high frequency matrix elements".[4]

In this way, Van Vleck susceptibility comes from the second order energy correction, and can be written as

χVV=2nμ0(μB)2i(i0)gj2|g|Lz+gSz|ei|2Ee,iEg,

where n is the number density, and Sz and Lz are the projection of the spin and orbital angular momentum in the direction of the magnetic field, respectively.

In this way, χ0χVV+χLarmor, as the signs of Larmor and Van Vleck susceptibilities are opposite, the sign of χ0 depends on the specific properties of the material.

General formula and Van Vleck criteria

For a more general system (molecules, complex systems), the paramagnetic susceptibility for an ensemble of independent magnetic moments can be written as

χpara=μ0μB2nipiipi[(Wi(1))2kT2Wi(2)];pi=exp(Ei(0)kT),

where

Wi(1)=gJ(i)ei|Jz|ei/,
Wi(2)=12k(ki)|ei|Lz+gSz|ek|2δEi,k;δEi,k=Ee,i(0)Ee,k(0),

and gJ(i) is the Landรฉ g-factor of state i. Van Vleck summarizes the results of this formula in four cases, depending on the temperature:[3]

  1. if all |δEi,k|kBT, where kB is Boltzmann constant, the susceptibility follows Curie law: χpara1/T;
  2. if all |δEi,k|kBT, the susceptibility is independent of the temperature;
  3. if all |δEi,k| is either kBT or kBT, the susceptibility has a mixed behavior and χpara1/T+c, where c is a constant;
  4. if all |δEi,k|kBT, there is no simple dependence on T.

While molecular oxygen Template:Chem and nitric oxide Template:Chem are similar paramagnetic gases, Template:Chem follows Curie law as in case (a), while Template:Chem, deviates slightly from it. In 1927, Van Vleck considered Template:Chem to be in case (d) and obtained a more precise prediction of its susceptibility using the formula above.[2][4]

Systems of interest

The standard example of Van Vleck paramagnetism are europium(III) oxide (Template:Chem) salts where there are six 4f electrons in trivalent europium ions. The ground state of Template:Chem that has a total azimuthal quantum number j=0 and Curie's contribution (C0/T) vanishes, the first excited state with j=1 is very close to the ground state at 330 K and contributes through second order corrections as showed by Van Vleck. A similar effect is observed in samarium salts (Template:Chem ions).[7][6] In the actinides, Van Vleck paramagnetism is also important in Template:Chem and Template:Chem which have a localized 5f6 configuration.[7]

References

Template:Reflist Template:Magnetic states