Tractor bundle

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In conformal geometry, the tractor bundle is a particular vector bundle constructed on a conformal manifold whose fibres form an effective representation of the conformal group (see associated bundle).

The term tractor is a portmanteau of "Tracy Thomas" and "twistor", the bundle having been introduced first by T. Y. Thomas as an alternative formulation of the Cartan conformal connection,[1] and later rediscovered within the formalism of local twistors and generalized to projective connections by Michael Eastwood et al. in [2] Tractor bundles can be defined for arbitrary parabolic geometries.[3]

Conformal manifolds

The tractor bundle for a n-dimensional conformal manifold M of signature (p,q) is a rank n+2 vector bundle 𝒯→M equipped with the following data:[2]

  • a metric G:π’―βŠ—π’―β†’β„, of signature (p+1,q+1),
  • a line subbundle π’³βŠ‚π’―,
  • a linear connection βˆ‡, preserving the metric G, and satisfying the nondegeneracy property that, for any local non-vanishing section X of the bundle 𝒳,

vβ†¦βˆ‡vX(mod𝒳) is a linear isomorphism at each point from the tangent bundle of M (v∈TM) to the quotient bundle 𝒳βŠ₯/𝒳, where 𝒳βŠ₯ denotes the orthogonal complement of 𝒳 in 𝒯 relative to the metric G.

Given a tractor bundle, the metrics in the conformal class are given by fixing a local section X of 𝒳, and defining for v,w∈TM, gX(v,w)=G(βˆ‡vX,βˆ‡wX).

To go the other way, and construct a tractor bundle from a conformal structure, requires more work. The tractor bundle is then an associated bundle of the Cartan geometry determined by the conformal structure. The conformal group for a manifold of signature (p,q) is SO(p+1,q+1), and one obtains the tractor bundle (with connection) as the connection induced by the Cartan conformal connection on the bundle associated to the standard representation of the conformal group. Because the fibre of the Cartan conformal bundle is the stabilizer of a null ray, this singles out the line bundle 𝒳.

More explicitly, suppose that g is a metric on M, with Levi-Civita connection βˆ‡. The tractor bundle is the space of 2-jets of solutions Οƒ to the eigenvalue equation (βˆ‡iβˆ‡j+Pij)Οƒ=Ξ»gij where Pij is the Schouten tensor. A little work then shows that the sections of the tractor bundle (in a fixed Weyl gauge) can be represented by (n+2)-vectors UI=[σμiρ]. The connection is βˆ‡jUI=βˆ‡j[σμiρ]=[βˆ‡jΟƒβˆ’ΞΌjβˆ‡jΞΌi+Ξ΄jiρ+PjiΟƒβˆ‡jΟβˆ’PjiΞΌi]. The metric, on UI=(Οƒ ΞΌi Ο) and VJ=(Ο„ Ξ½j Ξ±) is: GIJUIVJ=ΞΌiΞ½i+στ+ρα The preferred line bundle 𝒳 is the span of XI=[001].

Given a change in Weyl gauge g^ij=e2Ξ³gij, the components of the tractor bundle change according to the rule [Οƒ^ΞΌ^iρ^]=[σμi+Ξ³iΟƒΟβˆ’Ξ³jΞΌjβˆ’Ξ³2Οƒ/2] where Ξ³i=βˆ‡iΞ³, and the inverse metric gij has been used in one place to raise the index. Clearly the bundle 𝒳 is invariant under the change in gauge, and the connection can be shown to be invariant using the conformal change in the Levi-Civita connection and Schouten tensor.

Projective manifolds

Let M be a projective manifold of dimension n. Then the tractor bundle is a rank n+1 vector bundle 𝒯, with connection βˆ‡, on M equipped with the additional data of a line subbundle 𝒳 such that, for any non-vanishing local section X of 𝒳, the linear operator vβ†¦βˆ‡vX(mod𝒳) is a linear isomorphism of the tangent space to 𝒯/𝒳.[2]

One recovers an affine connection in the projective class from a section X of 𝒳 by defining βˆ‡βˆ‡vwX=βˆ‡vβˆ‡wX(mod𝒳) and using the aforementioned isomorphism.

Explicitly, the tractor bundle can be represented in a given affine chart by pairs (ΞΌi Ο), where the connection is βˆ‡j[ΞΌiρ]=[βˆ‡jΞΌi+Ξ΄jiΟβˆ‡jΟβˆ’PijΞΌi] where Pij is the projective Schouten tensor. The preferred subbundle 𝒳 is that spanned by X=(0 1).

Here the projective Schouten tensor of an affine connection is defined as follows. Define the Riemann tensor in the usual way (indices are abstract) (βˆ‡iβˆ‡jβˆ’βˆ‡jβˆ‡i)Uβ„“=Rijkβ„“Uk. Then Rijkβ„“=Cijkβ„“+2Ξ΄[iβ„“Pj]k+Ξ²ijΞ΄kβ„“ where the Weyl tensor Cijkβ„“ is trace-free, and 2P[ij]=βˆ’Ξ²ij (by Bianchi).

References

  1. ↑ Thomas, T. Y., "On conformal differential geometry", Proc. N.A.S. 12 (1926), 352–359; "Conformal tensors", Proc. N.A.S. 18 (1931), 103–189.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Template:Citation
  3. ↑ Čap, A., & Gover, A. (2002). Tractor calculi for parabolic geometries. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 354(4), 1511-1548.