Thomas–Fermi equation

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Numerical solutions of the Thomas–Fermi equation

In mathematics, the Thomas–Fermi equation for the neutral atom is a second order non-linear ordinary differential equation, named after Llewellyn Thomas and Enrico Fermi,[1][2] which can be derived by applying the Thomas–Fermi model to atoms. The equation reads

d2ydx2=1xy3/2

subject to the boundary conditions[3]

y(0)=1,{y()=0for neutral atomsy(x0)=0for positive ionsy(x1)x1y(x1)=0for compressed neutral atoms

If y approaches zero as x becomes large, this equation models the charge distribution of a neutral atom as a function of radius x. Solutions where y becomes zero at finite x model positive ions.[4] For solutions where y becomes large and positive as x becomes large, it can be interpreted as a model of a compressed atom, where the charge is squeezed into a smaller space. In this case the atom ends at the value of x for which dy/dx=y/x.[5][6]

Transformations

Introducing the transformation z=y/x converts the equation to

1x2ddx(x2dzdx)z3/2=0

This equation is similar to Lane–Emden equation with polytropic index 3/2 except the sign difference. The original equation is invariant under the transformation xcx, yc3y. Hence, the equation can be made equidimensional by introducing y=x3u into the equation, leading to

x2d2udx26xdudx+12u=u3/2

so that the substitution x=et reduces the equation to

d2udt27dudt+12u=u3/2.

Treating w=du/dt as the dependent variable and u as the independent variable, we can reduce the above equation to

wdwdu7w=u3/212u.

But this first order equation has no known explicit solution, hence, the approach turns to either numerical or approximate methods.

Sommerfeld's approximation

The equation has a particular solution yp(x), which satisfies the boundary condition that y0 as x, but not the boundary condition y(0)=1. This particular solution is

yp(x)=144x3.

Arnold Sommerfeld used this particular solution and provided an approximate solution which can satisfy the other boundary condition in 1932.[7] If the transformation x=1/t, w=yt is introduced, the equation becomes

t4d2wdt2=w3/2,w(0)=0, w()t.

The particular solution in the transformed variable is then wp(t)=144t4. So one assumes a solution of the form w=wp(1+αtλ) and if this is substituted in the above equation and the coefficients of α are equated, one obtains the value for λ, which is given by the roots of the equation λ2+7λ6=0. The two roots are λ1=0.772, λ2=7.772, where we need to take the positive root to avoid the singularity at the origin. This solution already satisfies the first boundary condition (w(0)=0), so, to satisfy the second boundary condition, one writes to the same level of accuracy for an arbitrary n

W=wp(1+βtλ)n=[144t3(1+βtλ)n]t.

The second boundary condition will be satisfied if 144t3(1+βtλ)n=144t3βntλn(1+β1tλ)n1 as t. This condition is satisfied if λn+3=0, 144βn=1 and since λ1λ2=6, Sommerfeld found the approximation as λ=λ1, n=3/λ1=λ2/2. Therefore, the approximate solution is

y(x)=yp(x){1+[yp(x)]λ1/3}λ2/2.

This solution predicts the correct solution accurately for large x, but still fails near the origin.

Solution near origin

Enrico Fermi[8] provided the solution for x1 and later extended by Edward B. Baker.[9] Hence for x1,

y(x)=1Bx+13x32B15x4++x3/2[432B5x+3B270x2+(227+B3252)x3+]

where B1.588071.[10][11]

It has been reported by Salvatore Esposito[12] that the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana found in 1928 a semi-analytical series solution to the Thomas–Fermi equation for the neutral atom, which however remained unpublished until 2001. Using this approach it is possible to compute the constant B mentioned above to practically arbitrarily high accuracy; for example, its value to 100 digits is B=1.588071022611375312718684509423950109452746621674825616765677418166551961154309262332033970138428665.

References

Template:Reflist

  1. Davis, Harold Thayer. Introduction to nonlinear differential and integral equations. Courier Corporation, 1962.
  2. Bender, Carl M., and Steven A. Orszag. Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers I: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  3. Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (2013). Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory (Vol. 3). Elsevier. Page. 259-263.
  4. pp. 9-12, N. H. March (1983). "1. Origins – The Thomas–Fermi Theory". In S. Lundqvist and N. H. March. Theory of The Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Plenum Press. Template:ISBN.
  5. March 1983, p. 10, Figure 1.
  6. p. 1562,Template:Cite journal
  7. Sommerfeld, A. "Integrazione asintotica dell’equazione differenziale di Thomas–Fermi." Rend. R. Accademia dei Lincei 15 (1932): 293.
  8. Template:Cite journal
  9. Template:Cite journal
  10. Comment on: “Series solution to the Thomas–Fermi equation” [Phys. Lett. A 365 (2007) 111], Francisco M.Fernández, Physics Letters A 372, 28 July 2008, 5258-5260, Template:Doi.
  11. The analytical solution of the Thomas-Fermi equation for a neutral atom, G I Plindov and S K Pogrebnya, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 20 (1987), L547, Template:Doi.
  12. Template:Cite journal