Testwiki:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 29
September 29
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replaced by Template:Tl on each page. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:56, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Out of interest, was it used? It looks to have been orphaned. Anyway, good catch. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 07:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused external link template. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused external link template. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused and redundant to a subsection of Template:Tl. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused. There are multiple conservation designations in the UK, and we already have templates for Template:Tl and others. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
we already have Template:Tl, so this is just historic and unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused, replaced by <math>\Vdash</math>. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused subtemplates of Template:Tld. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
unused subtemplate of Template:Tld. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Two redlinks only. Not even a primary article – almost a CSD G8 candidate — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, navbox with no blue links. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 12:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Two redlinks, and a host of peripheral links. Not needed. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 12:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Only one article. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, ony one blue link, and despite what the page says, it's unused. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 12:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete per author request. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Similar to Template:Tl, but with wording telling users they should not type "save page" if they want to save their edits. I have never once seen this happen (although cf. the previous TFD). An edge case for which we do not need a template warning. In addition, it appears to never have been substituted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- See also the previous TfD, with a weak no-consensus close based on the extraordinarily lame argument that it must be useful because someone created it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, if someone actually does this, use the second parameter of Template:Tl to leave a note about it. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 12:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Feel free to delete, as I don't do vandalism patrol and cleaning up after newbies too much anymore. Not that this template (I believe) was made before subst: ever existed. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Is that a G7 request? That would finish this quickly... as in "speedily." Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 17:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, if you'd like it to be. -- Zanimum (talk) 16:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Tagged. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 18:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, if you'd like it to be. -- Zanimum (talk) 16:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Is that a G7 request? That would finish this quickly... as in "speedily." Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 17:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Feel free to delete, as I don't do vandalism patrol and cleaning up after newbies too much anymore. Not that this template (I believe) was made before subst: ever existed. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
This appears to be a minor award, not worthy of a navbox: however, I would appreciate clarification. Template is currently unused. No other Satellite Award navboxes (spelt correctly or incorrectly) currently exist. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete because it is a minor award that is not worth having a navbox to link otherwise unrelated actors. I'm not a fan of award winner navboxes, either... it seems weird to see the decade-specific templates as if somehow the people who won in the same decade as you matter more than other decades. I'd rather do away with such navboxes and link them directly to the full list of winners of a particular award if it's that interesting. We shouldn't have to chop it up nor put it in the footer where navboxes with better links (all films by one director or all films in one series) belong. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:45, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't make sense: no games have been played of the 2014 World Cup - that's certainly not what this template says. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Consider
Template:Tl, Template:Tl, Template:Tl, Template:Tl,Template:Tl, Template:Tl and Template:Tl to be co-noms. WP:MADEUP. Only used on a user page that I'm about to take to MfD. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)- I'm assuming you didn't mean the 2010 templates? — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- D'oh. Lack of caffeine. Indeed, ignore that. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eu-151 for the corresponding MfD. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you didn't mean the 2010 templates? — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal template. Expects the user to have a "userboxes" subpage, and a "favourite page" (whatever that might be). Also links to the user's watchlist, which doesn't work. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, unused and pointless. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 12:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Userfy if the creator wants it. Otherwise, 
Delete per This, that, and the other →Σ ⚑ ☭ 03:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Only two articles: WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.