Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2019 March 9
Template:Error:not substituted
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Science desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < March 8 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Feb | March | Apr >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Contents
March 9
We have the Lorentz transformation:
Suppose a man Joe in reference frame measures coordinates of some point at . In the point has coordinates:
.
From Joe's point of view a moving (in positive direction) man Moe in his reference frame at has coordinates:
.
But from Moe's point of view is moving with speed . So his coordinate contracts to .
Moe can highlight a position of on his -axis. What will see Joe ? Will he see 2 highlighted marks and ?
Username160611000000 (talk) 14:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm having a hella time following that, but I think what you're saying is that if you look at a Lorentz-contracted object and imagine how far that object thinks it has gone past you, you suppose that because it is contracted it thinks you are expanded. But in truth the object sees you as contracted as much as it is, so the distance is contracted in both frames! The reason is that you and it don't see the same times as simultaneous. You could highlight the same point at different times, but that shouldn't be sufficient to actually expand the distance to x*gamma factor; when two points are at relative rest, and the distance between them is x in that frame, it won't be longer than that in any frame, I don't think. ??? Wnt (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Template:ReTemplate:Tq Both men stay at coordinates . The only difference is that they move relative to each other, and point is at rest in system . Username160611000000 (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The time coordinates are:
- in : ;
- as seen from : ;
- in (as seen from ): ;
- as seen from : .
In the Lecture 34 Feynman says
Template:Quote frame
Why have we to divide by ? Is it because a moving person thinks that time (or better ) has passed at a slow clock rate? The moving man takes from , converts it to his time and then does he take the same radians and divide? Username160611000000 (talk) 09:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Mute swan wings
I've noticed there's a particular way mute swans and some black swans swim, with their wings partially raised off of their backs. This is in contrast to the trumpeter swan, which holds its wings completely folded while swimming. Is there a specific name for what these birds are doing? Template:Gallery BlueSkinnyJeans (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- (Reformatted your image list.) --76.69.46.228 (talk) 05:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- By raising the profile of theirs wings the Mute swan and the Black swan are exhibiting threatening or assertive behaviour. Swans under non-threatening circumstances will swim with the wings flat against the body but in response to a perceived threat, particularly when protecting young or a nest, will raise their wings which increases the apparent size of the bird. Wing raising as a threat in Trumpeter swans seems much rarer or possibly non existent. I was unable to find any image to demonstrate it. Richard Avery (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's called "busking". [3] Alansplodge (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Then I suggest a short article busk (birds) or busking (birds). --76.69.46.228 (talk) 06:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's called "busking". [3] Alansplodge (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- By raising the profile of theirs wings the Mute swan and the Black swan are exhibiting threatening or assertive behaviour. Swans under non-threatening circumstances will swim with the wings flat against the body but in response to a perceived threat, particularly when protecting young or a nest, will raise their wings which increases the apparent size of the bird. Wing raising as a threat in Trumpeter swans seems much rarer or possibly non existent. I was unable to find any image to demonstrate it. Richard Avery (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Or, since it only seems to be associated with swans, maybe just a section in the swan article? Or in Display (zoology)? —107.15.157.44 (talk) 07:43, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- National Geographic suggests they may also use this posture to "windsurf" across water: [4] —107.15.157.44 (talk) 08:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)