Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 September 15

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < September 14 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Aug | September | Oct >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


September 15

Defining 1^infinity as e

Briefly, in March 2013 (study the history of the 1 article) there was a period where someone wrote that 1 to the infinity power is e. Is there any logic in this statement?? Georgia guy (talk) 21:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

One of the classic ways of defining e is
e=limn(1+1n)n
which is an example of the indeterminate form 1. So you can sort of see where it comes from. As to whether this is a better choice of a value to assign to 1 than any other, I would say that it is not. --Trovatore (talk) 21:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
In general:
ex=limn(1+xn)n.
So by changing the value of x you can get any positive value for 1. If you allow complex values for x then you can get any non-zero value. You could tweak the limit in other ways to get 1 = 0 or ∞. I think it's best to leave 1, along with 0/0, ∞/∞, ∞ − ∞, etc. undefined except as indeterminate forms with no assigned value. --RDBury (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
PS. "Briefly" here means for approximately 8 min. on March 11. There is also a blurb in the talk page Talk:1/Archive 1#1^∞ is e. --RDBury (talk) 22:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
It is indeed best left alone. One might choose to define it that way, but that makes a lot of algebra break down. You need to introduce all kinds of exceptions all over the place, or else you get things like
e2=(1)2=12×=(12)=1=e.
 --Lambiam 10:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
"I would quarrel with mathematics and say that the sum of many zeros is a dangerous number" (Stanislaw Jerzy Lec). And 1 is the exponential of it. pma 13:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The sum of any number of zeros is zero. Georgia guy (talk) 14:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Corollary. Zero is a dangerous number.  --Lambiam 14:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Re AFAIK the 'zero' in the Lec's aphorism may be a person with little knowledge (possibly also little skills) compared to their social position. --CiaPan (talk) 19:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

See 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯ for some other strange formulas, but I don't remember 1=e having anything like that. 67.164.113.165 (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)