Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 November 5

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < November 4 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Oct | November | Dec >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


November 5

Pillai's theorem: |AxnBym|xλn

For every x>1,y>1,n>1,m>1, Pillai's theorem states the following:

  • The difference |AxnBym|xλn for any λ less than 1, uniformly in m and n.

I wonder if one can prove (e.g. by his theorem) the following claim:

  • There exists x, such that for every n>2,m>1, there exist a,b such that every A>a,B>b satisfy |AxnBym|>(x+2)2.

If the answer is positive, and Px is the minimal prime larger than any given x, then I also wonder if one can prove (e.g. by his theorem) the following:

  • There exists x, such that for every n>2,m>1, there exist a,b such that every A>a,B>b satisfy |AxnBym|>Px2.

185.24.76.181 (talk) 14:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

I'd like to see a precise statement of the theorem, written out with explicit quantifiers. Perhaps I misunderstand the notation, but I doubt that, uniformly,
|(x2)nx2n|x.
 --Lambiam 18:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, he at least means that for every x,y and every n>1,m>1, there exist a,b such that every A>a,B>b satisfy |AxnBym|>xλn for any λ less than 1. 185.24.76.176 (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
So set x=y=1,n=m=2, and given a and b with the stated property whose existence is promised for these values, set A=B=max(a,b)+1. Then the lhs of the inequation equals 0, while the rhs equals 1.  --Lambiam 22:57, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, I was wrong with my interpretation. Reading our article about Pillai's theorem, I'm sure he at least meant that for every x>1,y>1,n>1,m>1, there exist a,b such that every A>a,B>b satisfy |AxnBym|>xλn for any λ less than 1. 185.24.76.176 (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Then set x=y=2, and the rest as before.  --Lambiam 23:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Oh, so weird! Thanks to your comment, now I wonder what our article means - quoting Pillai's theorem. 185.24.76.176 (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC)