Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2018 October 10
From testwiki
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template:Error:not substituted
{| width = "100%"
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < October 9 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Sep | October | Nov >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Contents
October 10
Limit question
Is there a nice way to show that ? Trying to turn it into 0/0 and using L'Hôpital's rule seems to just get me stuck in a mess of algebra that doesn't seem to be getting me any closer to the nice answer. Double sharp (talk) 14:57, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Re One way is to first make the substitution and then let Then, you can write each cosecant as its Laurent series around 0: Then you can take the limit easily. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- (Or better, all that matters here is ). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thank you for your help; that indeed worked perfectly! Clearly I have some more reading to do. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I hope you don't mind that I linked to your answer elsewhere, as this limit came up in a forum discussion I was involved in today. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Naw, no worries. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! Double sharp (talk) 16:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Naw, no worries. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I hope you don't mind that I linked to your answer elsewhere, as this limit came up in a forum discussion I was involved in today. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thank you for your help; that indeed worked perfectly! Clearly I have some more reading to do. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- (Or better, all that matters here is ). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)