Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2018 April 7

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < April 6 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Mar | April | May >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


April 7

Name for ellipse-like shape that resembles a dumb-bell

Hi, I'm looking for the name of a curve (and its mathematical parameterization) that amounts to a generalization of the ellipse -- one that is pinched a bit along the minor axis so that it can resemble a dumb-bell. Thanks. Attic Salt (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:Re Do you possibly mean the Cassini oval...? --CiaPan (talk) 18:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
That will do very nicely. Thank you. Attic Salt (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The Cassini ovals are not "a generalization of the ellipse", though: that is, no Cassini oval is an ellipse. —Tamfang (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. Attic Salt (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Is there a constant?

Is there a constant that can make this relation ln(x)/ln(c)=x? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.98.231.36 (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're asking exactly, but depending on the value of c, your equation may have 0, 1, or 2 (real) solutions. In general, I think you can solve for x in terms of the Lambert W function. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
He's asking for a constant c such that cx=x, i.e. a fixed point of the exponential function with base c. First off, the only c that satisfies this for all x is 1. Secondly, the exponential function for real x is always positive, so only positive x can be fixed points. There is only one value of c such that there is only one fixed point and it satisfies both cx=x and ln(c)cx=1 (as the graph of the exponential function there is tangent to the graph of the identity function), from which we conclude that x=1ln(c), c1ln(c)=1ln(c), c=ln(c)ln(c). Fixed point iteration of the latter equation yields c1.4446678610098 from which we recover x=1ln(c)2.718281828459. This looks uncanningly close to the value of e so I conjecture that x=e and c=e1e. For any c below this we have two solutions.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
By inspection of the curves, we can see that cx=x has either 0, 1 or 2 solutions, depending on the value of c. As Jasper notes, the case where there is exactly 1 solution corresponds to the case where cx is tangent to x. That is d(cx)dx=1. So cxln(c)=1. It's easy to see that Jasper's conjectured values for c and x satisfy this, proving Jasper's conjecture. RomanSpa (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Jasper: I think your sentence starting "First off..." is false and should be deleted: in general 1x is not equal to x. RomanSpa (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Brain fart. --Jasper Deng (talk) 07:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)