Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2017 May 6

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < May 5 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Apr | May | Jun >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


May 6

Kaprekar numbers

Are Kaprekar numbers idempotent under multiplication modulo 1 less than the next higher power of 10? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Apparently, 4879 is a counterexample. It is Kaprekar because 48792=23804641 and 238+04641=4879, but 487927021mod9999.
Clearly this happens because the split of 23804641 happens at the "wrong" location. I suspect the property should be easily provable for numbers which are Kaprekar by splitting at the middle. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 19:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Among the (base-10) Kaprekar numbers listed in the article, the exceptions are 4879, 5292 and 38962. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)