Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 September 8

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < September 7 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Aug | September | Oct >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


September 8

Model theory

Let's say we are given two first-order formulas α,β - each of which has two free variables. Let's assume that it follows from Peano system that for every A,B, there exists v satisfying both: α(A,v) - and β(B,v).

Is it provable (maybe by Compactness theorem? ) that Peano system has a model in which, for every A there exists v satisfying both: α(A,v) - and β(B,v) for every finite B?

HOTmag (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Either I'm misunderstanding what you're asking, or it's trivial. Your premise is that PA proves (w)(u)(v>u)ϕ(v,w)? In any nonstandard model, fix u nonstandard. Then for every w there is a v>u with ϕ(v,w), by assumption. This v is as desired.--2406:E006:384B:1:8C1E:B081:1ABF:3C81 (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to your important comment, I've just changed slightly my original post. Please have a look at the current version of my question. HOTmag (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
I think this still isn't what you mean to ask. Let α(A,v) be a tautology, and let β(B,v) be B=v. Then it's certainly true that for every pair A,B there is a v -- namely, v=B. But there is no v that works for every finite B.--2406:E006:384B:1:8C1E:B081:1ABF:3C81 (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
That's what I meant. Thanks to your trivial example, I see I was wrong about my assumption. Thank you. HOTmag (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)