Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 February 5
From testwiki
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template:Error:not substituted
{| width = "100%"
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < February 4 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jan | February | Mar >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Contents
February 5
Hessian Matrix Meaning
Let be a smooth function. Let , such that the gradient of f at x is zero. Let H be the Hessian matrix of f at the point x. Let V be the vector space spanned by the eigenvectors corresponding to negative eigenvalues of H. Let . Then, f(x)>f(y)? or maybe f(x)>f(x+y)?
In other words, does negative eigenvalue imply maximum point at the direction of the corresponding eigenvector, or maybe this is a maximum in another direction, and not in the direction of the eigenvector? עברית (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- See Morse lemma. Sławomir
Biały 12:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Template:EcYou're kind of circling around the second derivative test for functions of several variables. The Taylor expansion for f at x is
- where Df is the gradient and D2f is the Hessian. In this case the gradient is 0 at x so this reduces to
- Let e be an eigenvector with eigenvalue λ, and wlog take e to be length 1. If y = te, then
- so f has a local minimum or maximum along the line parallel to e though x, depending on whether λ is positive or negative. If e, f ... are several linearly independent eigenvectors, with eigenvalues λ, μ, ... , and y = te + uf + ... , then
- so f has a local minimum or maximum in the relevant space though x provided λ, μ, ... have the same sign. (The eigenvectors may be taken to be orthogonal since D2f is symmetric.) Note, this is only valid for y sufficiently small, otherwise the higher order terms in the Taylor series become significant and the approximation is no longer valid. --RDBury (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)