Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 April 30
Template:Error:not substituted
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < April 29 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Mar | April | May >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Contents
April 30
Calculating Expected Value
Say that I randomly choose k balls out of n balls with repetitions, until the first time I get some ball that I've already chosen in the past (I can choose it again, since tere're repetitions). Let X denote the number of choices until the first time when I choose some ball that I've already chosen. What is the expected value of X? I thought that (because I need to choose a subset of k distinct balls, and then, to choose one of thes balls), but this leads to expected value < 1, which does not make sense to me. What is the correct expected value of X? Thanks in advance! 80.246.136.227 (talk) 06:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure there can even be an analytic formula for this. If k > n/2, the exact number of repetitions is 2, and so the expected value is 2. For k = n/2, the exact number of repetitions is either 2 or 3, the latter being very unlikely, so the expected value is slightly greater than 2. So it seems that there's a sort of kink point in the expected value function at k = n/2. Likewise, for k > n/3 the actual number of repetitions can be no more than 3, but for k = n/3 there is a slight chance of as many as 4 repetitions, so it seems that there's a kind of kink point there too. That's why I doubt there's an analytic function for the expected value. Loraof (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I've worked out the k=1 case (derivation omitted here), which is far simpler than other cases. We have
- and
- And the other relatively simple case has k=n/2. Then X=3 if all the ones not drawn on the first repetition are drawn on the second rep; otherwise X=2. So
- and Pr(X=2) equals 1 minus that. Hence
- These formulae helped me a lot! Thank you! 213.8.204.72 (talk) 11:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Assuming the choice model in question is: I reach into a bag of n balls and choose k all at once (so, without repetition), then put all k back and do this again: the probability that you see a first repeated ball on step t+1 is
- .
- (We take if a < b, including if a < 0.) From the probability distribution it is routine to write down a formula for the expected value. A priori this is an infinite sum, but of course only the first n/k or so terms are nonzero. Possibly this expression simplifies in some reasonable way, but I haven't thought about it. --JBL (talk) 19:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Assuming the choice model in question is: I reach into a bag of n balls and choose k all at once (so, without repetition), then put all k back and do this again: the probability that you see a first repeated ball on step t+1 is
- Also, the case k = 1 is an expectation form of the birthday problem and is treated here. --JBL (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)