Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2015 July 13

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < July 12 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jun | July | Aug >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


July 13

Why is 18 a solitary number?

I couldn't find any information on the subject in google, except for some archive reference desk, which offered some proof that I failed to understand. Basically what I am asking is, why aren't there other numbers n except from 18, for which sigma(n):n = 13:6, where sigma(n) is the sum of the divisors of n including n itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.204.34.208 (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The proof here is based on decomposing n and looking at the size of σ(n)/n. If n=ipiai then σ(n)=iσ(piai)=ipiai+11pi1. Also if we let f(n)=σ(n)/n we have f(n)=if(piai). All the factors are greater than 1. If you try n=2a3bm with a=2, b=1 the product f(2a)f(3b) will already be greater than 13/6, and f(m) will just make it larger, so it can't be right. If you try a=1, b=2 then the product will exceed 13/6 unless m=1 and then you have 18. The rest of the proof follows, using also the facts that σ(6)=12, and that for a prime p>3 we have σ(pa) is an integer and pa is odd. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 10:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
And, since I just can't get enough of Inside Out, I'll add that 18 is solitary because it lost the core memory that powers friendship island. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
I suppose they are a step up from The Numskulls. That cartoon strip has survived for fifty years now. Dmcq (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2015 (UTC)