Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2011 May 8
Template:Error:not substituted
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < May 7 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Apr | May | Jun >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
May 8
LaTeX arithmetic
(Not sure which board is most appropriate.) I'm trying to use LaTeX, specifically Kile, to do some basic arithmetic. However, I seem to be stuck right back at the start, as I can't seem to get /multiply to do anything meaningful. Is this the command I want? All I want to do is perform some command on say, "5" and "4" and get "20" or "9" or "1" or whatever, as appropriate. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 15:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm confused about what you're trying to do. As far as I know, LaTeX is for typesetting, not for computation. You can use
5\cdot4=20
- To typeset , but LaTeX isn't supposed to do the calculation itself. If I missed your point completely, can you provide more background? -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
OK I figured something out. I've never done this before, so I don't know if I'm doing it the right way. Integers can be stored in numbered "count registers". Here I'll define two count registers equal to 2 and 3, then display them, then multiply them and display the product:
\count1=2 \count2=3 \the\count1 \the\count2 \multiply\count1\count2 \the\count1
The displayed output is 236. The registers are displayed using "\the", and "\multiply" overwrites the first register with the product. Staecker (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Brilliant. Do you happen to know what addition, subtraction, and division will be? Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- /advance is addition, it would seem, and /advance/count1-/count2 (for example) works for subtraction. I can't imagine / is going to work, though, in multiplication. Lucky for me, I don't have to do any. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- \divide is for division. See wikibooks:TeX/count for this and basically no additional information. Staecker (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- /advance is addition, it would seem, and /advance/count1-/count2 (for example) works for subtraction. I can't imagine / is going to work, though, in multiplication. Lucky for me, I don't have to do any. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Make sure to use the backslash \ for LaTeX commands, and not the forward slash /. So it's \count and \multiply and not /count or /multiply. — Fly by Night (talk) 00:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Interesting series...
Dear Wikipedians:
I am trying to find the sum of an interesting series whose general term is:
I realized that the power forms the triangular numbers, and the general term of triangular numbers is , therefore the general term of the interesting series above can be written as:
So at this point it is clear that there is a geometric sequence subcomponent, , to my interesting series. However, I am at a total loss about what to do for the subcomponent, and also about how to separate the two subcomponents so that I could sum each one up individually.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
70.31.155.244 (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think there's a closed-form expression for the sum up to a finite term. For the infinite sum, Mathematica gives the result (assuming I'm reading it correctly) (see Theta function) which is 1.371759117358... . I have no idea how to arrive at this result. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't think you'll be able to separate the two parts you're talking about. Note also that n2 + n is always even, so your exponent is always an integer. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
The article titled theta function says this:
There you see a sum of two terms in the exponent, in which one is a constant times n2 and the other is a constant times n, just as in your series. So we would want
Recall that that
So
So we want
This will hold if the coefficients of n2 and n agree. Thus we need
and
So
and
But you probably intended your series to run from 0 to ∞ rather than from −∞ to ∞, so mutatis mutandis....
To be continued...... Michael Hardy (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC) So
To be continued.... Michael Hardy (talk) 17:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
To be continued.... Michael Hardy (talk) 21:04, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Michael, and so that
-
- and the final result is
- Bo Jacoby (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC).
- Or even simpler:
- Bo Jacoby (talk) 07:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC).
Thanks to everyone for your contribution. Now I know that the series in question cannot possibly have any closed form expressions using elementary functions and their combinations/compositions thereof. L33th4x0r (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)