Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2009 September 3

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < September 2 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Aug | September | Oct >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


September 3

Econometrics

Does anyone have any suggestions for a good undergraduate level econometrics text book?--98.240.70.102 (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I used Gujarati's Basic Econometrics, a very user-friendly introductory book, if somewhat lacking up-to-date treatment of recent topics such as the asymptotic (large-sample) approach.
A more modern choice can be Woolridge's Introductory Econometrics. Pallida  Mors 18:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Binomial Expansions

Template:Resolved

I have to determine the expansion in powers of x up to x4 of (1x3)6(1x)6. Now I can do this by some simple division and then expanding (1+x+x2)6 but is there any way of reaching the same answer by expanding the two sets of brackets separately? Thanks 92.4.122.142 (talk) 12:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, expand the first factor as 16x3+... and the second as 1+6x+(6)(7)x2/2+... Ignore powers of x above 4, and then multiply out the resulting expressions. Tedious, but it gives the same answer as your "simple division" method.Caution, expressions may contain typos. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Exactly! See Newton's generalised binomial theorem. (r = – 6 is the case of the second bracket) ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 17:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Uniform convergence of exp(-x2)sin(x/n) over R

Hi there guys,

could anyone please suggest a test or approach to check whether convergence of fn(x)=ex2sin(xn) to f(x)=0 over is uniform? I've tried everything I could think of (not much sadly) such as checking that obviously both fn(x) and f(x) are continuous, and trying to find a value for the maximum of ex2sin(xn), from which all I got was an ugly formula in xtan(x/n) (for x, not for fn(x)), and I don't seem to be making any headway. I don't need to be walked through what to do, but if I could just get myself aimed in the right direction that'd be great (e.g. the name of a test or a property to look at) - thanks!

Spamalert101 (talk) 18:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

No special machinery is needed here. To make f_n bounded by epsilon, just choose M large enough that exp(-x2) is less than epsilon outside [-M,M] and then make n large enough that sin(x/n) is smaller than epsilon inside [-M,M]. Algebraist 18:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Also, you may use these elementary inequalities for all t
|sin(t)||t|;et1+t;2t1+t2 and obtain
|fn(x)|12n for all x.
However, the first answer also shows a general principle (uniform convergence on intervals, with domination by a function vanishing at infinity, implies uniform convergence over R).
--pma (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks guys, that's a great help - didn't realize it could be that simple! Spamalert101 (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)