Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2009 November 20

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < November 19 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Oct | November | Dec >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


November 20

Counting system

Template:Resolved StuRat (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

What's the name of the common counting system where you draw 1-4 lines and then put a slash through the four lines when you get to 5 ? It looks something like this:

 ||||/  ||||   |||   ||   | 
 |||/   ||||   |||   ||   |
 ||/|=5 ||||=4 |||=3 ||=2 |=1
 |/||   ||||   |||   ||   |
 /|||   ||||   |||   ||   |
/||||   ||||   |||   ||   |

StuRat (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Tally. --PST 10:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. StuRat (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Also five-barred gate, rather more specific than tally.→86.148.187.62 (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Investigation of an integral

I'm working my way through some assorted questions, and stumbled across the following:
Investigate the integral: 031(1x)2dx
I'm afraid I can't really get anywhere with it, and when I finally succombed to Mathematica it told me it didn't converge between 0 and 3. Any suggestions for what I should try? --80.229.152.246 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Without knowing what level you're at, I can't guess what investigations you're supposed to carry out, but the value of the integral is fairly obviously +∞. Algebraist 22:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I got that much, but didn't really get anything else apart from that. Also, how would you go about setting out a proof of that fact? As for my current level, just before undergraduate. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
I would prove it by noting that the function is clearly measurable, that the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem implies that the integral you want is the limit of 011/n1(1x)2dx+1+1/n31(1x)2dx, and that the Fundamental theorem of calculus allows you to calculate those integrals and see that the limit is indeed plus infinity. That's not what I'd've written before I was an undergrad, though. Algebraist 23:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for that. While I agree that it's not exactly what a pre-undergrad would write, I'll still look into it. It's sure to be interesting, regardless. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Since as a pre-undergrad. you are likely to be more familiar with Riemann integral, rather than Lebesgue integral, here is a proof you can follow based on those ideas:

  1. Show that for any 0<h<1, 031(1x)2dx>1h1+h1(1x)2dx (Hint: the integrand is positive)
  2. Observe that, 1h1+h1(1x)2dx1h1+h1h2dx=2h.

Now by choosing h small enough, you can make the lower bound for the integral as large as you want. Hence the original integral evaluates to +∞. QED. Abecedare (talk)

Also, if you can do simple linear changes of variable, you may observe that
a/2a1x2dx=2a2a1x2dx>0,
that also makes it clear that the integral diverges.--pma (talk) 05:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Or, even simplier, if you haven't any problem with a linear change of variable for an "improper Riemann integral", as it is the integral of 1/x2 over (0,1]:
011x2dx=2021x2dx>0,
thus the only possible value of the LHS is +. --pma (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)