Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Usenet flood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Usenet flood

Template:La (delete) – (View log)

Permanent dicdef, no sources other than other wikis, no hope of expanding beyond dicdef. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

• Delete, per WP:NOTDIC, and lack of sources. Taelus (talk) 08:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete: neologism used by a single source, also WP:NAD, unreferenced, no assertion of WP:N, etc. etc.--It's me...Sallicio!^$\oplus$ 04:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.