Testwiki:Articles for deletion/The Devil's Dictionary X

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 16:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The Devil's Dictionary X

Template:La – (View log)

While there are numerous ghits, they stem primarily from people posting definitions from the book. I don't find any evidence of reviews of this online only book. There was a disucssion on Talk:The_Devil's_Dictionary_X when it was originally prodded but the one RS is and was a 404, the rest are blog postings, usenet postings, forum posts and a DMOZ listing. None of which pass WP:RS therefore I don't see this passing WP:BOOK Travellingcari (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Notability not established through reliable sources in the article, and like the nom, I can't find any. Deor (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I also can't find anything to meet WP:N. Article may be spam as well. --BizMgr (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, appears to be an advertisement, no attempt at references or third-party notability, author doesn't appear to express an interest.--Sallicio^$\oplus$ 08:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.