Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Oit Ihuk, Arizona

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. plicit 13:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:AFD help

Template:La – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Template:Find sources AFD)

This is an archaeological site of a former village, but there is no significant coverage to establish GNG. –dlthewave 04:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Delete False content in article, needs more substantive sources. Reywas92Talk 13:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep added source from the U.S. Department of the Interior that lists it as a termporary, or seasonal, village, so per WP:GEOLAND. RecycledPixels (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - populated places do not need to continue to be populated. And as per RecycledPixels. Onel5969 TT me 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:Resize
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Resize
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

  • REDIRECT and MERGE into San Xavier Indian Reservation, and not DELETE only because of RecycledPixles. I spent 15 minutes scouring google for any information other than the most basic info that is already provided, and could find nothing but other wikis with copies of WP. It seems to be as notable as a dirt mound that once had a teepee on top. Maybe the author can find some non-internet sources? Cheers! It's me... Sallicio! 13:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Clear

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.