Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Lambert-W step-potential

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Should'a been G12'd based on the copyvio claim. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Lambert-W step-potential

Template:La – (View log⧼dot-separator⧽ Stats)

(Template:Find sources AFD)

Not notable. This appears to be based around a single paper from 2015 with essentially no citations or other references to this name. (The author of which is from Armenia, as were the flurry of IP edits in this article's past) –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Also nominating

• Template:La

for the same reasons (same author, same lack of notability, etc). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 15:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete both as copyvios of [1] and [2] respectively. Sentences are basically carried over: "an implicitly elementary function that resolves the equation $W{e}^W=z$", "an asymmetric step of height $V_0$ whose steepness and asymmetry are controlled by parameter $\sigma$", "a four-parametric specification of a more general five-parametric potential which is also solvable in terms of the confluent hypergeometric functions", etc. XOR'easter (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.