Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Jo Bragg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 10:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Jo Bragg

Template:La - (View log)

Delete as per [[1]] --CatonB (talk) 10:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO#Politicians, just being an unelected candidate for political office does not confer notability; and no other notability is claimed. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless the author can provide something noteworthy; fails WP:BIO.--Sallicio^$\oplus$ 17:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as per WP:DEL#REASON, a what about x isnt a valid reason for deletion. Even suggest Speedy close as a possible WP:POINT nomiation. based on these [2][3][4][5] all created within 3 minutes for the same reason. Gnangarra 10:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes there is a valid reason - because he was a failed candidate like David Southwick - if David Southwick is deleted for being a failed candidate so too does this failed candidate. CatonB (talk) 03:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete this particular one is non notable. Orderinchaos 23:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.