Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Eesa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Eesa

Template:La (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable student organization. Fails WP:N. Nv8200p talk 16:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

E.E.S.A. is a notable student association, being that every member of the unbc/ubc environmental engineering program must be a member. In addition, EESA (and therefore the unbc environmental engineers) are hosting the next WESST conference. They also atteneded CFES congress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.181.168.189 (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 21:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:NN. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 21:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, A7. Stephen Turner (Talk) 22:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 02:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:ORG. Student organizations that exist at a single school are generally non-notable. In addition, the "history" section of this article has been vandalized several times, yet there is no "original" version in the article history that can be taken seriously; it was apparently never accurate to start with. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: the article may fall (barely) within WP:ORG but needs major wikification. It seems more like a MySpace page with its "notable" figures drinking beer from plastic cups. If someone with an interest can transform it into an encyclopedia article with proper references and third-party (such as news reports etc.) citations, I will gladly change my stance to Keep!--Sallicio^$\oplus$ 05:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.