Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Cesarina Ricci de Tingoli

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep due to nominator withdrawal, improvements per HEY and refactored !vote. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 08:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:AFD help

Template:La – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Template:Find sources AFD)

Currently-listed sources fail to demonstrate SIGCOV and she's only in passing mention. Grove Music is no longer online, and only 685 google results show up for Ricci. InvadingInvader (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

  • Keep, "Grove Music is no longer online"? What? It is literally right here. And since when is 600 google results (I got 800, by the way) not a lot? And a Baroque woman composer?... come on now. Aza24 (talk) 07:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
    Idk...but grove music showed a browser error for me when I tried to check it reminiscent of a domain not found error. I'll trust you though on that, though. InvadingInvader (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
    Sometimes old links to Grove are glitchy; one really has to search on the database to be sure. Aza24 (talk) 19:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - The Norton/Grove Dictionary of Women Composers includes an entry on her, and she is covered in other sources that I have added to the article. Her presence in the Norton/Grove dictionary meets criteria #6 for WP:COMPOSERS ("Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on their genre of music") DaffodilOcean (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep. Grove entry is adequate to show probable notability alone; it has three sources listed; and as others point out there is also an entry in Norton/Grove Dictionary of Women Composers. This is a completely absurd nomination. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:Clear

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.