Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Casimir goes to Casimir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. W.marsh 19:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Casimir goes to Casimir

Template:La – (View log)

AfD part-created by inexperienced user. Reason given: Any element in $U(𝔤)$ commutes with $f$ by definition. What makes the Casimir operator special? SL(2,R) 01:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC). Procedural nomination - no opinion being expressed by me. ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 13:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect and merge to Casimir invariant provided that the term 'Casimir goes to Casimir' is actualy used. Otherwise delete. Martijn Hoekstra 14:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Flag for needing expert attention and provisionally keep, weakly, for now. I suspect that merging this might be the best choice, and all Google found on the phrase[1] seemed to be Wikipedia mirrors. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect and merge per Redvers Martijn Hoekstra. JJL 18:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

  Not me. Martijn Hoekstra, I think. ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 19:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Shirley you're not suggesting that I made an error? JJL 20:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I am, and don't call me Shirley. ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 20:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC) :o)

• delete Google hits give no occurrence of the use of this term outside mirrors, indicating that this might not be a well used term. Casimir invariant is the obvious target. I'm not convinced that it justifies a redirect. --Salix alba (talk) 08:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Provisional keep per Smerdis; we need more expert eyes. CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect/Merge as suggested above, if necessary. If the term is as un-used as some suggest (I haven't the time to look into it) redirect may not be needed. --Cheeser1 19:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Idiosyncratic, nothing to merge since the content is already covered in Casimir invariant. Arcfrk 02:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice to later recreation as a redirect page. The lack of references and Google hits (also on Google scholar and Google books) shows that this is not even a plausible search term. If someone, however, later finds citable evidence of use, it is easy enough to add the term to the Casimir invariant article and create a redirect; little is lost by a deletion now.  --Lambiam 07:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.