Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Blackblack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Blackblack

Template:La – (View log)

Deleted twice as a7, once as prod, notability issues. The prod was contested so I am putting it here as a standard procedure. No opinion from my side. Tone 11:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:MUSIC, then suggest redirection to Black Black. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as failing WP:MUSIC and because notability is not inherited. Redirection as above could be fine.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of notability. Redirection doesn't make sense to me, the subjects are unrelated. —  X  S  G  22:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - I was unaware of the Alex Greenwald connection, which is pretty clearly a criteria for notability. —  X  S  G  23:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no notability. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep because the band is notable for containing guitarist Alex Greenwald of the notable band Phantom Planet. According to WP:MUSIC, this is grounds for notability. Also according to WP:MUSIC, the band page should redirect to Greenwald's page, but I believe this is not necessary because Blackblack have enough achievements of their own to at least make them above "side project" status. In the event that the page is deleted, I think redirection to Black Black is really not necessary because they are completely unrelated. I think if the page is deleted it should redirect to Alex Greenwald and a section should start on his page about the band. -Lamarcus (talk) 01:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Also, Blackblack had a tour in a sovereign nation (Japan), which is under the notability rules as well. -06:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamarcus (talk • contribs)
• Keep. WP:MUSIC criterion #6 clearly applies. Given there is a reasonable amount of cited material here, I would agree with Lamarcus that a merge with Alex Greenwald would not be a good idea. However, a merge would be more sensible than deletion. WP:MUSIC criterion #4 may also apply, although the article does need more citations. Bondegezou (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless the author or interested party can find notable references (someone's blog doesn't count as notable) and third-party citations.--Sallicio^$\oplus$ 09:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and place {{Verify}} tag at the top of the page. If no sources are added within the next few months I suggest re-AFD'ing it. D.M.N. (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY ^talk _contribs 03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - meets WP:MUSIC. matt91486 (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep This doesn't fail WP:MUSIC, it explicitly meet criterion #6. Keep it tagged per D.M.N. --L. Pistachio (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep for passing criterion #6 of WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Two tours and a semi-notable member is just enough for WP:MUSIC, isn't it? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.