String topology

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Technical String topology, a branch of mathematics, is the study of algebraic structures on the homology of free loop spaces. The field was started by Template:Harvs.

Motivation

While the singular cohomology of a space has always a product structure, this is not true for the singular homology of a space. Nevertheless, it is possible to construct such a structure for an oriented manifold M of dimension d. This is the so-called intersection product. Intuitively, one can describe it as follows: given classes x∈Hp(M) and y∈Hq(M), take their product x×y∈Hp+q(M×M) and make it transversal to the diagonal M↪M×M. The intersection is then a class in Hp+q−d(M), the intersection product of x and y. One way to make this construction rigorous is to use stratifolds.

Another case, where the homology of a space has a product, is the (based) loop space ΩX of a space X. Here the space itself has a product

m:ΩX×ΩX→ΩX

by going first through the first loop and then through the second one. There is no analogous product structure for the free loop space LX of all maps from S1 to X since the two loops need not have a common point. A substitute for the map m is the map

γ:Map(S1∨S1,M)→LM

where Map(S1∨S1,M) is the subspace of LM×LM, where the value of the two loops coincides at 0 and γ is defined again by composing the loops.

The Chas–Sullivan product

The idea of the Chas–Sullivan product is to now combine the product structures above. Consider two classes x∈Hp(LM) and y∈Hq(LM). Their product x×y lies in Hp+q(LM×LM). We need a map

i!:Hp+q(LM×LM)→Hp+q−d(Map(S1∨S1,M)).

One way to construct this is to use stratifolds (or another geometric definition of homology) to do transversal intersection (after interpreting Map(S1∨S1,M)⊂LM×LM as an inclusion of Hilbert manifolds). Another approach starts with the collapse map from LM×LM to the Thom space of the normal bundle of Map(S1∨S1,M). Composing the induced map in homology with the Thom isomorphism, we get the map we want.

Now we can compose i! with the induced map of γ to get a class in Hp+q−d(LM), the Chas–Sullivan product of x and y (see e.g. Template:Harvtxt).

Remarks

  • As in the case of the intersection product, there are different sign conventions concerning the Chas–Sullivan product. In some convention, it is graded commutative, in some it is not.
  • The same construction works if we replace H by another multiplicative homology theory h if M is oriented with respect to h.
  • Furthermore, we can replace LM by LnM=Map(Sn,M). By an easy variation of the above construction, we get that h∗(Map(N,M)) is a module over h∗LnM if N is a manifold of dimensions n.
  • The Serre spectral sequence is compatible with the above algebraic structures for both the fiber bundle ev:LM→M with fiber ΩM and the fiber bundle LE→LB for a fiber bundle E→B, which is important for computations (see Template:Harvtxt and Template:Harvtxt).

The Batalin–Vilkovisky structure

There is an action S1×LM→LM by rotation, which induces a map

H∗(S1)⊗H∗(LM)→H∗(LM).

Plugging in the fundamental class [S1]∈H1(S1), gives an operator

Δ:H∗(LM)→H∗+1(LM)

of degree 1. One can show that this operator interacts nicely with the Chas–Sullivan product in the sense that they form together the structure of a Batalin–Vilkovisky algebra on H∗(LM). This operator tends to be difficult to compute in general. The defining identities of a Batalin-Vilkovisky algebra were checked in the original paper "by pictures." A less direct, but arguably more conceptual way to do that could be by using an action of a cactus operad on the free loop space LM.[1] The cactus operad is weakly equivalent to the framed little disks operad[2] and its action on a topological space implies a Batalin-Vilkovisky structure on homology.[3]

Field theories

The pair of pants

There are several attempts to construct (topological) field theories via string topology. The basic idea is to fix an oriented manifold M and associate to every surface with p incoming and q outgoing boundary components (with n≥1) an operation

H∗(LM)⊗p→H∗(LM)⊗q

which fulfills the usual axioms for a topological field theory. The Chas–Sullivan product is associated to the pair of pants. It can be shown that these operations are 0 if the genus of the surface is greater than 0 (Template:Harvtxt).

References

Template:Reflist

Sources