Sobolev mapping

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, a Sobolev mapping is a mapping between manifolds which has smoothness in some sense. Sobolev mappings appear naturally in manifold-constrained problems in the calculus of variations and partial differential equations, including the theory of harmonic maps.[1][2][3]

Definition

Given Riemannian manifolds M and N, which is assumed by Nash's smooth embedding theorem without loss of generality to be isometrically embedded into ℝν as [4][5] Ws,p(M,N):={u∈Ws,p(M,ℝν)|u(x)∈N for almost every x∈M}. First-order (s=1) Sobolev mappings can also be defined in the context of metric spaces.[6][7]

Approximation

The strong approximation problem consists in determining whether smooth mappings from M to N are dense in Ws,p(M,N) with respect to the norm topology. When sp>dim⁡M, Morrey's inequality implies that Sobolev mappings are continuous and can thus be strongly approximated by smooth maps. When sp=dim⁡M, Sobolev mappings have vanishing mean oscillation[8] and can thus be approximated by smooth maps.[9]

When sp<dim⁡M, the question of density is related to obstruction theory: C∞(M,N) is dense in W1,p(M,N) if and only if every continuous mapping on a from a ⌊p⌋–dimensional triangulation of M into N is the restriction of a continuous map from M to N.[10][5]

The problem of finding a sequence of weak approximation of maps in W1,p(M,N) is equivalent to the strong approximation when p is not an integer.[10] When p is an integer, a necessary condition is that the restriction to a ⌊p−1⌋-dimensional triangulation of every continuous mapping from a ⌊p⌋–dimensional triangulation of M into N coincides with the restriction a continuous map from M to N.[5] When p=2, this condition is sufficient.[11] For W1,3(M,𝕊2) with dim⁡M≥4, this condition is not sufficient.[12]

Homotopy

The homotopy problem consists in describing and classifying the path-connected components of the space Ws,p(M,N) endowed with the norm topology. When 0<s≤1 and dim⁡M≤sp, then the path-connected components of Ws,p(M,N) are essentially the same as the path-connected components of C(M,N): two maps in Ws,p(M,N)∩C(M,N) are connected by a path in Ws,p(M,N) if and only if they are connected by a path in C(M,N), any path-connected component of Ws,p(M,N) and any path-connected component of C(M,N) intersects Ws,p(M,N)∩C(M,N) non trivially.[13][14][15] When dim⁡M>p, two maps in W1,p(M,N) are connected by a continuous path in W1,p(M,N) if and only if their restrictions to a generic ⌊p−1⌋-dimensional triangulation are homotopic.[5]Template:Rp

Extension of traces

The classical trace theory states that any Sobolev map u∈W1,p(M,N) has a trace Tu∈W1−1/p,p(∂M,N) and that when N=ℝ, the trace operator is onto. The proof of the surjectivity being based on an averaging argument, the result does not readily extend to Sobolev mappings. The trace operator is known to be onto when π1(N)≃⋯π⌊p−1⌋(N)≃{0}[16] or when p≥3, π1(N) is finite and π2(N)≃⋯π⌊p−1⌋(N)≃{0}.[17] The surjectivity of the trace operator fails if π⌊p−1⌋(N)≄{0} [16][18] or if πℓ(N) is infinite for some ℓ∈{1,…,⌊p−1⌋}.[17][19]

Lifting

Given a covering map π:N~→N, the lifting problem asks whether any map u∈Ws,p(M,N) can be written as u=π∘u~ for some u~∈Ws,p(M,N~), as it is the case for continuous or smooth u and u~ when M is simply-connected in the classical lifting theory. If the domain M is simply connected, any map u∈Ws,p(M,N) can be written as u=π∘u~ for some u~∈Ws,p(M,N) when sp≥dim⁡M,[20][21] when s≥1 and 2≤sp<dim⁡M[22][21] and when N is compact, 0<s<1 and 2≤sp<dim⁡M.[23] There is a topological obstruction to the lifting when sp<2 and an analytical obstruction when 1≤sp<dim⁡M.[20][21]

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading