Segre's theorem

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:More footnotes

to the definition of a finite oval: t tangent, s1,...sn secants, n is the order of the projective plane (number of points on a line -1)

In projective geometry, Segre's theorem, named after the Italian mathematician Beniamino Segre, is the statement:

This statement was assumed 1949 by the two Finnish mathematicians G. JΓ€rnefelt and P. Kustaanheimo and its proof was published in 1955 by B. Segre.

A finite pappian projective plane can be imagined as the projective closure of the real plane (by a line at infinity), where the real numbers are replaced by a finite field Template:Mvar. Odd order means that Template:Math is odd. An oval is a curve similar to a circle (see definition below): any line meets it in at most 2 points and through any point of it there is exactly one tangent. The standard examples are the nondegenerate projective conic sections.

In pappian projective planes of even order greater than four there are ovals which are not conics. In an infinite plane there exist ovals, which are not conics. In the real plane one just glues a half of a circle and a suitable ellipse smoothly.

The proof of Segre's theorem, shown below, uses the 3-point version of Pascal's theorem and a property of a finite field of odd order, namely, that the product of all the nonzero elements equals -1.

Definition of an oval

Template:Main

  • In a projective plane a set 𝔬 of points is called oval, if:
(1) Any line g meets 𝔬 in at most two points.

If |gβˆ©π”¬|=0 the line g is an exterior (or passing) line; in case |gβˆ©π”¬|=1 a tangent line and if |gβˆ©π”¬|=2 the line is a secant line.

(2) For any point Pβˆˆπ”¬ there exists exactly one tangent t at Template:Mvar, i.e., tβˆ©π”¬={P}.

For finite planes (i.e. the set of points is finite) we have a more convenient characterization:

  • For a finite projective plane of order Template:Mvar (i.e. any line contains Template:Math points) a set 𝔬 of points is an oval if and only if |𝔬|=n+1 and no three points are collinear (on a common line).

Pascal's 3-point version

for the proof g∞ is the tangent at P3
Theorem

Let be 𝔬 an oval in a pappian projective plane of characteristic β‰ 2.
𝔬 is a nondegenerate conic if and only if statement (P3) holds:

(P3): Let be P1,P2,P3 any triangle on 𝔬 and PiPiβ€Ύ the tangent at point Pi to 𝔬, then the points
P4:=P1P1β€Ύβˆ©P2P3β€Ύ, P5:=P2P2β€Ύβˆ©P1P3β€Ύ, P6:=P3P3β€Ύβˆ©P1P2β€Ύ
are collinear.[1]
to the proof of the 3-point Pascal theorem
Proof

Let the projective plane be coordinatized inhomogeneously over a field K such that P3=(0),g∞ is the tangent at P3, (0,0)βˆˆπ”¬, the x-axis is the tangent at the point (0,0) and 𝔬 contains the point (1,1). Furthermore, we set P1=(x1,y1),P2=(x2,y2) . (s. image)
The oval 𝔬 can be described by a function f:K↦K such that:

𝔬={(x,y)∈K2|y=f(x)} βˆͺ{(∞)}.

The tangent at point (x0,f(x0)) will be described using a function f such that its equation is

y=f(x0)(xβˆ’x0)+f(x0)

Hence (s. image)

P5=(x1,f(x2)(x1βˆ’x2)+f(x2)) and P4=(x2,f(x1)(x2βˆ’x1)+f(x1)).

I: if 𝔬 is a non degenerate conic we have f(x)=x2 and f(x)=2x and one calculates easily that P4,P5,P6 are collinear.

II: If 𝔬 is an oval with property (P3), the slope of the line P4P5β€Ύ is equal to the slope of the line P1P2β€Ύ, that means:

f(x2)+f(x1)βˆ’f(x2)βˆ’f(x1)x2βˆ’x1=f(x2)βˆ’f(x1)x2βˆ’x1 and hence
(i): (f(x2)+f(x1))(x2βˆ’x1)=2(f(x2)βˆ’f(x1)) for all x1,x2∈K.

With f(0)=f(0)=0 one gets

(ii): f(x2)x2=2f(x2) and from f(1)=1 we get
(iii): f(1)=2.

(i) and (ii) yield

(iv): f(x2)x1=f(x1)x2 and with (iii) at least we get
(v): f(x2)=2x2 for all x2∈K.

A consequence of (ii) and (v) is

f(x2)=x22,x2∈K.

Hence 𝔬 is a nondegenerate conic.

Remark: Property (P3) is fulfilled for any oval in a pappian projective plane of characteristic 2 with a nucleus (all tangents meet at the nucleus). Hence in this case (P3) is also true for non-conic ovals.[2]

Segre's theorem and its proof

Theorem

Any oval 𝔬 in a finite pappian projective plane of odd order is a nondegenerate conic section.

3-point version of Pascal's theorem, for the proof we assume g∞=P2P3β€Ύ
Segre's theorem: to its proof
Proof
[3]

For the proof we show that the oval has property (P3) of the 3-point version of Pascal's theorem.

Let be P1,P2,P3 any triangle on 𝔬 and P4,P5,P6 defined as described in (P3). The pappian plane will be coordinatized inhomogeneously over a finite field K, such thatP3=(∞),P2=(0),P1=(1,1) and (0,0) is the common point of the tangents at P2 and P3. The oval 𝔬 can be described using a bijective function f:Kβˆ—:=Kβˆͺβˆ–{0}↦Kβˆ—:

𝔬={(x,y)∈K2|y=f(x),xβ‰ 0}βˆͺ{(0),(∞)}.

For a point P=(x,y),x∈Kβˆ–{0,1}, the expression m(x)=f(x)βˆ’1xβˆ’1 is the slope of the secant PP1β€Ύ. Because both the functions x↦f(x)βˆ’1 and x↦xβˆ’1 are bijections from Kβˆ–{0,1} to Kβˆ–{0,βˆ’1}, and x↦m(x) a bijection from Kβˆ–{0,1} onto Kβˆ–{0,m1}, where m1 is the slope of the tangent at P1, for Kβˆ—βˆ—:=Kβˆ–{0,1}: we get

∏x∈Kβˆ—βˆ—(f(x)βˆ’1)=∏x∈Kβˆ—βˆ—(xβˆ’1)=1undm1β‹…βˆx∈Kβˆ—βˆ—f(x)βˆ’1xβˆ’1=βˆ’1.

(Remark: For Kβˆ—:=Kβˆ–{0} we have: ∏k∈Kβˆ—k=βˆ’1.)
Hence

βˆ’1=m1β‹…βˆx∈Kβˆ—βˆ—f(x)βˆ’1xβˆ’1=m1β‹…βˆx∈Kβˆ—βˆ—(f(x)βˆ’1)∏x∈Kβˆ—βˆ—(xβˆ’1)=m1.

Because the slopes of line P5P6β€Ύ and tangent P1P1β€Ύ both are βˆ’1, it follows that P1P1β€Ύβˆ©P2P3β€Ύ=P4∈P5P6β€Ύ. This is true for any triangle P1,P2,P3βˆˆπ”¬.

So: (P3) of the 3-point Pascal theorem holds and the oval is a non degenerate conic.

References

Template:Reflist

Sources

  • Simeon Ball and Zsuzsa Weiner: An Introduction to Finite Geometry [1]