Schur's inequality

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:About Template:More citations needed In mathematics, Schur's inequality, named after Issai Schur, establishes that for all non-negative real numbers x, y, z, and t>0,

xt(xy)(xz)+yt(yz)(yx)+zt(zx)(zy)0

with equality if and only if x = y = z or two of them are equal and the other is zero. When t is an even positive integer, the inequality holds for all real numbers x, y and z.

When t=1, the following well-known special case can be derived:

x3+y3+z3+3xyzxy(x+y)+xz(x+z)+yz(y+z)

Proof

Since the inequality is symmetric in x,y,z we may assume without loss of generality that xyz. Then the inequality

(xy)[xt(xz)yt(yz)]+zt(xz)(yz)0

clearly holds, since every term on the left-hand side of the inequality is non-negative. This rearranges to Schur's inequality.

Extensions

A generalization of Schur's inequality is the following: Suppose a,b,c are positive real numbers. If the triples (a,b,c) and (x,y,z) are similarly sorted, then the following inequality holds:

a(xy)(xz)+b(yz)(yx)+c(zx)(zy)0.

In 2007, Romanian mathematician Valentin Vornicu showed that a yet further generalized form of Schur's inequality holds:

Consider a,b,c,x,y,z, where abc, and either xyz or zyx. Let k+, and let f:0+ be either convex or monotonic. Then,

f(x)(ab)k(ac)k+f(y)(ba)k(bc)k+f(z)(ca)k(cb)k0.

The standard form of Schur's is the case of this inequality where x = a, y = b, z = c, k = 1, ƒ(m) = mr.[1]

Another possible extension states that if the non-negative real numbers xyzv with and the positive real number t are such that x + v ≥ y + z then[2]

xt(xy)(xz)(xv)+yt(yx)(yz)(yv)+zt(zx)(zy)(zv)+vt(vx)(vy)(vz)0.

Notes

Template:Reflist

  1. Vornicu, Valentin; Olimpiada de Matematica... de la provocare la experienta; GIL Publishing House; Zalau, Romania.
  2. Template:Cite journal