Roundtrip efficiency
Roundtrip efficiency is a key performance metric for an energy storage system (ESS) that characterizes the energy lost during a full chargeTemplate:En dashdischarge cycle.Template:Sfn It is defined as the ratio of the energy output from the system during discharge to the energy input supplied during charging. A higher round-trip efficiency indicates lower energy losses and operational costs.Template:Sfn
The efficiency can be expressed as a percentage using the formula:
Round-trip efficiency greatly affects the economics of energy storage systems, particularly for applications in grid stability, renewable energy integration, and peak demand management.Template:Sfn
Factors affecting efficiency
The round-trip efficiency of a storage system accounts for losses from multiple sources. These can include:Template:Sfn
- Conversion inefficiencies
- Heat dissipation
For the green hydrogen and green ammonia the main factors are:
- water electrolysis voltage required for production of hydrogen (the energy required for ammonia synthesis is relatively small). The hydrogen production energy linearly depends on the required voltage (that in turn depends on the catalyst used in anode and cathode);Template:Sfn
- efficiency of the power plant that burns the fuel (combined cycle gas turbine provides the highest efficiency of 64% assumed for high-end estimates).Template:Sfn
Comparison of storage methods
Different energy storage technologies exhibit a wide range of round-trip efficiencies. The technology is often selected based on its intended application, such as providing power quality and distributed power or serving as bulk energy storage.Template:Sfn
| Storage Technology | Median Efficiency (%) | Efficiency Range (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Lead-acid battery | ~75% | ~60% – 90% |
| Li-ion battery | ~90% | ~85% – 95%[1] |
| Sodium–sulfur battery | ~60% – 90%[2] | |
| Flywheel | ~92% | ~85% – 95% |
| Supercapacitor | 85% – 95% | |
| Superconductive | ~90% | ~85% – 97% |
| Compressed air | ~52% | ~41% – 90%[3] |
| Thermal[4] | ~40% | ~30% – 50%[5] |
| Pumped hydro | ~75% | ~65% – 85% |
| Redox flow | 60% – 75% | |
| Green hydrogen | ~40%Template:Sfn | 28 – 52%Template:Sfn |
| Green ammonia | 23 – 42%Template:Sfn |
See also
References
Sources
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite conference
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- ↑ Ma et al. (2011) claims 70%–95% without citation, but newer sources that are better cited, e.g. Nadeem et al. (2019), report 85%–95%.
- ↑ Sources vary significantly: Ma et al. (2011) indicates ~60%–70%, while newer data from Nadeem et al. (2019) reports 75%–90%.
- ↑ Nadeem et al. (2019) note a range of 41–75% for underground systems and 70–90% for overground systems.
- ↑ Includes conversion to electricity
- ↑ Nadeem et al. (2019) note 30–50% for low-temperature systems. The ~80% upper bound for high-temperature systems reported there likely represents thermal-to-thermal efficiency rather than full round-trip electricity conversion.