Random generalized Lotka–Volterra model

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

Example dynamics in the unique fixed point and multiple attractors phases with S=64 species. For both simulations (μα,γ,K,σK)=(4,0,1,0). For UFP, σα=1; for MA, σα=2.

The random generalized Lotka–Volterra model (rGLV) is an ecological model and random set of coupled ordinary differential equations where the parameters of the generalized Lotka–Volterra equation are sampled from a probability distribution, analogously to quenched disorder. The rGLV models dynamics of a community of species in which each species' abundance grows towards a carrying capacity but is depleted due to competition from the presence of other species. It is often analyzed in the many-species limit using tools from statistical physics, in particular from spin glass theory.

The rGLV has been used as a tool to analyze emergent macroscopic behavior in microbial communities with dense, strong interspecies interactions. The model has served as a context for theoretical investigations studying diversity-stability relations in community ecology[1] and properties of static and dynamic coexistence.[2][3] Dynamical behavior in the rGLV has been mapped experimentally in community microcosms.[4] The rGLV model has also served as an object of interest for the spin glass and disordered systems physics community to develop new techniques and numerical methods.[5][6][7][8][9]

Definition

The random generalized Lotka–Volterra model is written as the system of coupled ordinary differential equations,[1][2][4][10]dNidt=riKiNi(KiNij(i)αijNj),i=1,,S,where Ni is the abundance of species i, S is the number of species, Ki is the carrying capacity of species i in the absence of interactions, ri sets a timescale, and α is a random matrix whose entries are random variables with mean αij=μα/S, variance var(αij)=σα2/S, and correlations corr(αij,αji)=γ for ij where 1γ1. The interaction matrix, α, may be parameterized as,αij=μαS+σαSaij,where aij are standard random variables (i.e., zero mean and unit variance) with aijaji=γ for ij. The matrix entries may have any distribution with common finite first and second moments and will yield identical results in the large S limit due to the central limit theorem. The carrying capacities may also be treated as random variables with Ki=K,var(Ki)=σK2. Analyses by statistical physics-inspired methods have revealed phase transitions between different qualitative behaviors of the model in the many-species limit. In some cases, this may include transitions between the existence of a unique globally-attractive fixed point and chaotic, persistent fluctuations.

Steady-state abundances in the thermodynamic limit

In the thermodynamic limit (i.e., the community has a very large number of species) where a unique globally-attractive fixed point exists, the distribution of species abundances can be computed using the cavity method while assuming the system is self-averaging. The self-averaging assumption means that the distribution of any one species' abundance between samplings of model parameters matches the distribution of species abundances within a single sampling of model parameters. In the cavity method, an additional mean-field species i=0 is introduced and the response of the system is approximated linearly. The cavity calculation yields a self-consistent equation describing the distribution of species abundances as a mean-field random variable, N0. When σK=0, the mean-field equation is,[1]0=N0(KμαmN0+q(μα2+γσα2)Z+σα2γχN0),where m=N0,q=N02,χ=N0/K0, and Z𝒩(0,1) is a standard normal random variable. Only ecologically uninvadable solutions are taken (i.e., the largest solution for N0 in the quadratic equation is selected). The relevant susceptibility and moments of N0, which has a truncated normal distribution, are determined self-consistently.

Dynamical phases

In the thermodynamic limit where there is an asymptotically large number of species (i.e., S), there are three distinct phases: one in which there is a unique fixed point (UFP), another with a multiple attractors (MA), and a third with unbounded growth. In the MA phase, depending on whether species abundances are replenished at a small rate, may approach arbitrarily small population sizes, or are removed from the community when the population falls below some cutoff, the resulting dynamics may be chaotic with persistent fluctuations or approach an initial conditions-dependent steady state.[1]

The transition from the UFP to MA phase is signaled by the cavity solution becoming unstable to disordered perturbations. When σK=0, the phase transition boundary occurs when the parameters satisfy,σα=21+γ.In the σK>0 case, the phase boundary can still be calculated analytically, but no closed-form solution has been found; numerical methods are necessary to solve the self-consistent equations determining the phase boundary.


The transition to the unbounded growth phase is signaled by the divergence of N0 as computed in the cavity calculation.

Dynamical mean-field theory

The cavity method can also be used to derive a dynamical mean-field theory model for the dynamics. The cavity calculation yields a self-consistent equation describing the dynamics as a Gaussian process defined by the self-consistent equation (for σK=0),[8]dN0dt=N0(t)[K0N0(t)μαm(t)σαη(t)+γσα20tdtχ(t,t)N0(t)],where m(t)=N0(t), η is a zero-mean Gaussian process with autocorrelation η(t)η(t)=N0(t)N0(t), and χ(t,t)=δN0(t)/δK0(t)|K0(t)=K0 is the dynamical susceptibility defined in terms of a functional derivative of the dynamics with respect to a time-dependent perturbation of the carrying capacity.

Using dynamical mean-field theory, it has been shown that at long times, the dynamics exhibit aging in which the characteristic time scale defining the decay of correlations increases linearly in the duration of the dynamics. That is, CN(t,t+tτ)f(τ) when t is large, where CN(t,t)=N(t)N(t) is the autocorrelation function of the dynamics and f(τ) is a common scaling collapse function.[8][11]

When a small immigration rate λ1 is added (i.e., a small constant is added to the right-hand side of the equations of motion) the dynamics reach a time transitionally invariant state. In this case, the dynamics exhibit jumps between O(1) and O(λ) abundances.[12]

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

Template:Modelling ecosystems