Proofs of trigonometric identities

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

There are several equivalent ways for defining trigonometric functions, and the proofs of the trigonometric identities between them depend on the chosen definition. The oldest and most elementary definitions are based on the geometry of right triangles and the ratio between their sides. The proofs given in this article use these definitions, and thus apply to non-negative angles not greater than a right angle. For greater and negative angles, see Trigonometric functions.

Other definitions, and therefore other proofs are based on the Taylor series of sine and cosine, or on the differential equation f″+f=0 to which they are solutions.

Elementary trigonometric identities

Definitions

Trigonometric functions specify the relationships between side lengths and interior angles of a right triangle. For example, the sine of angle θ is defined as being the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse.

The six trigonometric functions are defined for every real number, except, for some of them, for angles that differ from 0 by a multiple of the right angle (90°). Referring to the diagram at the right, the six trigonometric functions of θ are, for angles smaller than the right angle:

sin⁡θ=oppositehypotenuse=ah
cos⁡θ=adjacenthypotenuse=bh
tan⁡θ=oppositeadjacent=ab
cot⁡θ=adjacentopposite=ba
sec⁡θ=hypotenuseadjacent=hb
csc⁡θ=hypotenuseopposite=ha

Ratio identities

In the case of angles smaller than a right angle, the following identities are direct consequences of above definitions through the division identity

ab=(ah)(bh).

They remain valid for angles greater than 90° and for negative angles.

tan⁡θ=oppositeadjacent=(oppositehypotenuse)(adjacenthypotenuse)=sin⁡θcos⁡θ
cot⁡θ=adjacentopposite=(adjacentadjacent)(oppositeadjacent)=1tan⁡θ=cos⁡θsin⁡θ
sec⁡θ=1cos⁡θ=hypotenuseadjacent
csc⁡θ=1sin⁡θ=hypotenuseopposite
tan⁡θ=oppositeadjacent=(opposite×hypotenuseopposite×adjacent)(adjacent×hypotenuseopposite×adjacent)=(hypotenuseadjacent)(hypotenuseopposite)=sec⁡θcsc⁡θ

Or

tan⁡θ=sin⁡θcos⁡θ=(1csc⁡θ)(1sec⁡θ)=(csc⁡θsec⁡θcsc⁡θ)(csc⁡θsec⁡θsec⁡θ)=sec⁡θcsc⁡θ
cot⁡θ=csc⁡θsec⁡θ

Complementary angle identities

Two angles whose sum is π/2 radians (90 degrees) are complementary. In the diagram, the angles at vertices A and B are complementary, so we can exchange a and b, and change θ to π/2 − θ, obtaining:

sin⁡(π/2−θ)=cos⁡θ
cos⁡(π/2−θ)=sin⁡θ
tan⁡(π/2−θ)=cot⁡θ
cot⁡(π/2−θ)=tan⁡θ
sec⁡(π/2−θ)=csc⁡θ
csc⁡(π/2−θ)=sec⁡θ

Pythagorean identities

Template:Main article Identity 1:

sin2θ+cos2θ=1

The following two results follow from this and the ratio identities. To obtain the first, divide both sides of sin2θ+cos2θ=1 by cos2θ; for the second, divide by sin2θ.

tan2θ+1 =sec2θ
sec2θ−tan2θ=1

Similarly

1 +cot2θ=csc2θ
csc2θ−cot2θ=1

Identity 2:

The following accounts for all three reciprocal functions.

csc2θ+sec2θ−cot2θ=2 +tan2θ

Proof 2:

Refer to the triangle diagram above. Note that a2+b2=h2 by Pythagorean theorem.

csc2θ+sec2θ=h2a2+h2b2=a2+b2a2+a2+b2b2=2 +b2a2+a2b2

Substituting with appropriate functions -

2 +b2a2+a2b2=2 +tan2θ+cot2θ

Rearranging gives:

csc2θ+sec2θ−cot2θ=2 +tan2θ

Angle sum identities

Template:See also

Sine

Illustration of the sum formula.

Draw a horizontal line (the x-axis); mark an origin O. Draw a line from O at an angle α above the horizontal line and a second line at an angle β above that; the angle between the second line and the x-axis is α+β.

Place P on the line defined by α+β at a unit distance from the origin.

Let PQ be a line perpendicular to line OQ defined by angle α, drawn from point Q on this line to point P. ∴ OQP is a right angle.

Let QA be a perpendicular from point A on the x-axis to Q and PB be a perpendicular from point B on the x-axis to P. ∴ OAQ and OBP are right angles.

Draw R on PB so that QR is parallel to the x-axis.

Now angle RPQ=α (because OQA=π2−α, making RQO=α,RQP=π2−α, and finally RPQ=α)

RPQ=π2−RQP=π2−(π2−RQO)=RQO=α
OP=1
PQ=sin⁡β
OQ=cos⁡β
AQOQ=sin⁡α, so AQ=sin⁡αcos⁡β
PRPQ=cos⁡α, so PR=cos⁡αsin⁡β
sin⁡(α+β)=PB=RB+PR=AQ+PR=sin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡β

By substituting −β for β and using the reflection identities of even and odd functions, we also get:

sin⁡(α−β)=sin⁡αcos⁡(−β)+cos⁡αsin⁡(−β)
sin⁡(α−β)=sin⁡αcos⁡β−cos⁡αsin⁡β

Cosine

Using the figure above,

OP=1
PQ=sin⁡β
OQ=cos⁡β
OAOQ=cos⁡α, so OA=cos⁡αcos⁡β
RQPQ=sin⁡α, so RQ=sin⁡αsin⁡β
cos⁡(α+β)=OB=OA−BA=OA−RQ=cos⁡αcos⁡β −sin⁡αsin⁡β

By substituting −β for β and using the reflection identities of even and odd functions, we also get:

cos⁡(α−β)=cos⁡αcos⁡(−β)−sin⁡αsin⁡(−β),
cos⁡(α−β)=cos⁡αcos⁡β+sin⁡αsin⁡β

Also, using the complementary angle formulae,

cos⁡(α+β)=sin⁡(π/2−(α+β))=sin⁡((π/2−α)−β)=sin⁡(π/2−α)cos⁡β−cos⁡(π/2−α)sin⁡β=cos⁡αcos⁡β−sin⁡αsin⁡β

Tangent and cotangent

From the sine and cosine formulae, we get

tan⁡(α+β)=sin⁡(α+β)cos⁡(α+β)=sin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡βcos⁡αcos⁡β−sin⁡αsin⁡β

Dividing both numerator and denominator by cos⁡αcos⁡β, we get

tan⁡(α+β)=tan⁡α+tan⁡β1−tan⁡αtan⁡β

Subtracting β from α, using tan⁡(−β)=−tan⁡β,

tan⁡(α−β)=tan⁡α+tan⁡(−β)1−tan⁡αtan⁡(−β)=tan⁡α−tan⁡β1+tan⁡αtan⁡β

Similarly, from the sine and cosine formulae, we get

cot⁡(α+β)=cos⁡(α+β)sin⁡(α+β)=cos⁡αcos⁡β−sin⁡αsin⁡βsin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡β

Then by dividing both numerator and denominator by sin⁡αsin⁡β, we get

cot⁡(α+β)=cot⁡αcot⁡β−1cot⁡α+cot⁡β

Or, using cot⁡θ=1tan⁡θ,

cot⁡(α+β)=1−tan⁡αtan⁡βtan⁡α+tan⁡β=1tan⁡αtan⁡β−11tan⁡α+1tan⁡β=cot⁡αcot⁡β−1cot⁡α+cot⁡β

Using cot⁡(−β)=−cot⁡β,

cot⁡(α−β)=cot⁡αcot⁡(−β)−1cot⁡α+cot⁡(−β)=cot⁡αcot⁡β+1cot⁡β−cot⁡α

Double-angle identities

From the angle sum identities, we get

sin⁡(2θ)=2sin⁡θcos⁡θ

and

cos⁡(2θ)=cos2θ−sin2θ

The Pythagorean identities give the two alternative forms for the latter of these:

cos⁡(2θ)=2cos2θ−1
cos⁡(2θ)=1−2sin2θ

The angle sum identities also give

tan⁡(2θ)=2tan⁡θ1−tan2θ=2cot⁡θ−tan⁡θ
cot⁡(2θ)=cot2θ−12cot⁡θ=cot⁡θ−tan⁡θ2

It can also be proved using Euler's formula

eiφ=cos⁡φ+isin⁡φ

Squaring both sides yields

ei2φ=(cos⁡φ+isin⁡φ)2

But replacing the angle with its doubled version, which achieves the same result in the left side of the equation, yields

ei2φ=cos⁡2φ+isin⁡2φ

It follows that

(cos⁡φ+isin⁡φ)2=cos⁡2φ+isin⁡2φ.

Expanding the square and simplifying on the left hand side of the equation gives

i(2sin⁡φcos⁡φ)+cos2φ−sin2φ =cos⁡2φ+isin⁡2φ.

Because the imaginary and real parts have to be the same, we are left with the original identities

cos2φ−sin2φ =cos⁡2φ,

and also

2sin⁡φcos⁡φ=sin⁡2φ.

Half-angle identities

The two identities giving the alternative forms for cos 2θ lead to the following equations:

cos⁡θ2=±1+cos⁡θ2,
sin⁡θ2=±1−cos⁡θ2.

The sign of the square root needs to be chosen properly—note that if 2Template:Pi is added to θ, the quantities inside the square roots are unchanged, but the left-hand-sides of the equations change sign. Therefore, the correct sign to use depends on the value of θ.

For the tan function, the equation is:

tan⁡θ2=±1−cos⁡θ1+cos⁡θ.

Then multiplying the numerator and denominator inside the square root by (1 + cos θ) and using Pythagorean identities leads to:

tan⁡θ2=sin⁡θ1+cos⁡θ.

Also, if the numerator and denominator are both multiplied by (1 - cos θ), the result is:

tan⁡θ2=1−cos⁡θsin⁡θ.

This also gives:

tan⁡θ2=csc⁡θ−cot⁡θ.

Similar manipulations for the cot function give:

cot⁡θ2=±1+cos⁡θ1−cos⁡θ=1+cos⁡θsin⁡θ=sin⁡θ1−cos⁡θ=csc⁡θ+cot⁡θ.

Miscellaneous – the triple tangent identity

If ψ+θ+ϕ=π= half circle (for example, ψ, θ and ϕ are the angles of a triangle),

tan⁡(ψ)+tan⁡(θ)+tan⁡(ϕ)=tan⁡(ψ)tan⁡(θ)tan⁡(ϕ).

Proof:[1]

ψ=π−θ−ϕtan⁡(ψ)=tan⁡(π−θ−ϕ)=−tan⁡(θ+ϕ)=−tan⁡θ−tan⁡ϕ1−tan⁡θtan⁡ϕ=tan⁡θ+tan⁡ϕtan⁡θtan⁡ϕ−1(tan⁡θtan⁡ϕ−1)tan⁡ψ=tan⁡θ+tan⁡ϕtan⁡ψtan⁡θtan⁡ϕ−tan⁡ψ=tan⁡θ+tan⁡ϕtan⁡ψtan⁡θtan⁡ϕ=tan⁡ψ+tan⁡θ+tan⁡ϕ

Miscellaneous – the triple cotangent identity

If ψ+θ+ϕ=π2= quarter circle,

cot⁡(ψ)+cot⁡(θ)+cot⁡(ϕ)=cot⁡(ψ)cot⁡(θ)cot⁡(ϕ).

Proof:

Replace each of ψ, θ, and ϕ with their complementary angles, so cotangents turn into tangents and vice versa.

Given

ψ+θ+ϕ=π2
∴(π2−ψ)+(π2−θ)+(π2−ϕ)=3π2−(ψ+θ+ϕ)=3π2−π2=π

so the result follows from the triple tangent identity.

Sum to product identities

  • sin⁡θ±sin⁡ϕ=2sin⁡(θ±ϕ2)cos⁡(θ∓ϕ2)
  • cos⁡θ+cos⁡ϕ=2cos⁡(θ+ϕ2)cos⁡(θ−ϕ2)
  • cos⁡θ−cos⁡ϕ=−2sin⁡(θ+ϕ2)sin⁡(θ−ϕ2)

Proof of sine identities

First, start with the sum-angle identities:

sin⁡(α+β)=sin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡β
sin⁡(α−β)=sin⁡αcos⁡β−cos⁡αsin⁡β

By adding these together,

sin⁡(α+β)+sin⁡(α−β)=sin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡β+sin⁡αcos⁡β−cos⁡αsin⁡β=2sin⁡αcos⁡β

Similarly, by subtracting the two sum-angle identities,

sin⁡(α+β)−sin⁡(α−β)=sin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡β−sin⁡αcos⁡β+cos⁡αsin⁡β=2cos⁡αsin⁡β

Let α+β=θ and α−β=ϕ,

∴α=θ+ϕ2 and β=θ−ϕ2

Substitute θ and ϕ

sin⁡θ+sin⁡ϕ=2sin⁡(θ+ϕ2)cos⁡(θ−ϕ2)
sin⁡θ−sin⁡ϕ=2cos⁡(θ+ϕ2)sin⁡(θ−ϕ2)=2sin⁡(θ−ϕ2)cos⁡(θ+ϕ2)

Therefore,

sin⁡θ±sin⁡ϕ=2sin⁡(θ±ϕ2)cos⁡(θ∓ϕ2)

Proof of cosine identities

Similarly for cosine, start with the sum-angle identities:

cos⁡(α+β)=cos⁡αcos⁡β −sin⁡αsin⁡β
cos⁡(α−β)=cos⁡αcos⁡β+sin⁡αsin⁡β

Again, by adding and subtracting

cos⁡(α+β)+cos⁡(α−β)=cos⁡αcos⁡β −sin⁡αsin⁡β+cos⁡αcos⁡β+sin⁡αsin⁡β=2cos⁡αcos⁡β
cos⁡(α+β)−cos⁡(α−β)=cos⁡αcos⁡β −sin⁡αsin⁡β−cos⁡αcos⁡β−sin⁡αsin⁡β=−2sin⁡αsin⁡β

Substitute θ and ϕ as before,

cos⁡θ+cos⁡ϕ=2cos⁡(θ+ϕ2)cos⁡(θ−ϕ2)
cos⁡θ−cos⁡ϕ=−2sin⁡(θ+ϕ2)sin⁡(θ−ϕ2)

Inequalities

Template:See also

Illustration of the sine and tangent inequalities.

The figure at the right shows a sector of a circle with radius 1. The sector is Template:Math of the whole circle, so its area is Template:Math. We assume here that Template:Math.

OA=OD=1
AB=sin⁡θ
CD=tan⁡θ

The area of triangle Template:Math is Template:Math, or Template:Math. The area of triangle Template:Math is Template:Math, or Template:Math.

Since triangle Template:Math lies completely inside the sector, which in turn lies completely inside triangle Template:Math, we have

sin⁡θ<θ<tan⁡θ.

This geometric argument relies on definitions of arc length and area, which act as assumptions, so it is rather a condition imposed in construction of trigonometric functions than a provable property.[2] For the sine function, we can handle other values. If Template:Math, then Template:Math. But Template:Math (because of the Pythagorean identity), so Template:Math. So we have

sin⁡θθ<1   if   0<θ.

For negative values of Template:Math we have, by the symmetry of the sine function

sin⁡θθ=sin⁡(−θ)−θ<1.

Hence

sin⁡θθ<1if θ≠0,

and

tan⁡θθ>1if 0<θ<π2.

Identities involving calculus

Preliminaries

limθ→0sin⁡θ=0
limθ→0cos⁡θ=1

Sine and angle ratio identity

limθ→0sin⁡θθ=1

In other words, the function sine is differentiable at 0, and its derivative is 1.

Proof: From the previous inequalities, we have, for small angles

sin⁡θ<θ<tan⁡θ,

Therefore,

sin⁡θθ<1<tan⁡θθ,

Consider the right-hand inequality. Since

tan⁡θ=sin⁡θcos⁡θ
∴1<sin⁡θθcos⁡θ

Multiply through by cos⁡θ

cos⁡θ<sin⁡θθ

Combining with the left-hand inequality:

cos⁡θ<sin⁡θθ<1

Taking cos⁡θ to the limit as θ→0

limθ→0cos⁡θ=1

Therefore,

limθ→0sin⁡θθ=1

Cosine and angle ratio identity

limθ→01−cos⁡θθ=0

Proof:

1−cos⁡θθ=1−cos2θθ(1+cos⁡θ)=sin2θθ(1+cos⁡θ)=(sin⁡θθ)×sin⁡θ×(11+cos⁡θ)

The limits of those three quantities are 1, 0, and 1/2, so the resultant limit is zero.

Cosine and square of angle ratio identity

limθ→01−cos⁡θθ2=12

Proof:

As in the preceding proof,

1−cos⁡θθ2=sin⁡θθ×sin⁡θθ×11+cos⁡θ.

The limits of those three quantities are 1, 1, and 1/2, so the resultant limit is 1/2.

Proof of compositions of trig and inverse trig functions

All these functions follow from the Pythagorean trigonometric identity. We can prove for instance the function

sin⁡[arctan⁡(x)]=x1+x2

Proof:

We start from

sin2θ+cos2θ=1 (I)

Then we divide this equation (I) by cos2θ

cos2θ=1tan2θ+1 (II)
1−sin2θ=1tan2θ+1

Then use the substitution θ=arctan⁡(x):

1−sin2[arctan⁡(x)]=1tan2[arctan⁡(x)]+1
sin2[arctan⁡(x)]=tan2[arctan⁡(x)]tan2[arctan⁡(x)]+1

Then we use the identity tan⁡[arctan⁡(x)]≡x

sin⁡[arctan⁡(x)]=xx2+1 (III)

And initial Pythagorean trigonometric identity proofed...


Similarly if we divide this equation (I) by sin2θ

sin2θ=111+1tan2θ (II)
sin2θ=tan2θtan2θ+1

Then use the substitution θ=arctan⁡(x):

sin2[arctan⁡(x)]=tan2[arctan⁡(x)]tan2[arctan⁡(x)]+1

Then we use the identity tan⁡[arctan⁡(x)]≡x

sin⁡[arctan⁡(x)]=xx2+1 (III)

And initial Pythagorean trigonometric identity proofed...


[arctan⁡(x)]=[arcsin⁡(xx2+1)]
y=xx2+1
y2=x2x2+1 (IV)


Let we guess that we have to prove:

x=y1−y2


x2=y21−y2 (V)


Replacing (V) into (IV) :

y2=y2(1−y2)y2(1−y2)+1
y2=y2(1−y2)1(1−y2)

So it's true: y2=y2 and guessing statement was true: x=y1−y2

[arctan⁡(x)]=[arcsin⁡(xx2+1)]=[arcsin⁡(y)]=[arctan⁡(y1−y2)]


Now y can be written as x ; and we have [arcsin] expressed through [arctan]...


[arcsin⁡(x)]=[arctan⁡(x1−x2)]


Similarly if we seek :[arccos⁡(x)]...

cos⁡[arccos⁡(x)]=x
cos⁡(π2−(π2−[arccos⁡(x)]))=x
sin⁡(π2−[arccos⁡(x)])=x
π2−[arccos⁡(x)]=[arcsin⁡(x)]
[arccos⁡(x)]=π2−[arcsin⁡(x)]


From :[arcsin⁡(x)]...

[arccos⁡(x)]=π2−[arctan⁡(x1−x2)]
[arccos⁡(x)]=π2−[arccot⁡(1−x2x)]

And finally we have [arccos] expressed through [arctan]...


[arccos⁡(x)]=[arctan⁡(1−x2x)]

See also

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend