Polar curve

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:About

The elliptic curve E : 4Y2Z = X3 − XZ2 in blue, and its polar curve (E) : 4Y2 = 2.7X2 − 2XZ − 0.9Z2 for the point Q = (0.9, 0) in red. The black lines show the tangents to E at the intersection points of E and its first polar with respect to Q meeting at Q.

In algebraic geometry, the first polar, or simply polar of an algebraic plane curve C of degree n with respect to a point Q is an algebraic curve of degree n−1 which contains every point of C whose tangent line passes through Q. It is used to investigate the relationship between the curve and its dual, for example in the derivation of the Plücker formulas.

Definition

Let C be defined in homogeneous coordinates by f(x, y, z) = 0 where f is a homogeneous polynomial of degree n, and let the homogeneous coordinates of Q be (a, b, c). Define the operator

ΔQ=a∂∂x+b∂∂y+c∂∂z.

Then ΔQf is a homogeneous polynomial of degree n−1 and ΔQf(x, y, z) = 0 defines a curve of degree n−1 called the first polar of C with respect of Q.

If P=(p, q, r) is a non-singular point on the curve C then the equation of the tangent at P is

x∂f∂x(p,q,r)+y∂f∂y(p,q,r)+z∂f∂z(p,q,r)=0.

In particular, P is on the intersection of C and its first polar with respect to Q if and only if Q is on the tangent to C at P. For a double point of C, the partial derivatives of f are all 0 so the first polar contains these points as well.

Class of a curve

The class of C may be defined as the number of tangents that may be drawn to C from a point not on C (counting multiplicities and including imaginary tangents). Each of these tangents touches C at one of the points of intersection of C and the first polar, and by Bézout's theorem there are at most n(n−1) of these. This puts an upper bound of n(n−1) on the class of a curve of degree n. The class may be computed exactly by counting the number and type of singular points on C (see Plücker formula).

Higher polars

The p-th polar of a C for a natural number p is defined as ΔQpf(x, y, z) = 0. This is a curve of degree n−p. When p is n−1 the p-th polar is a line called the polar line of C with respect to Q. Similarly, when p is n−2 the curve is called the polar conic of C.

Using Taylor series in several variables and exploiting homogeneity, f(λa+μp, λb+μq, λc+μr) can be expanded in two ways as

μnf(p,q,r)+λμn−1ΔQf(p,q,r)+12λ2μn−2ΔQ2f(p,q,r)+…

and

λnf(a,b,c)+μλn−1ΔPf(a,b,c)+12μ2λn−2ΔP2f(a,b,c)+….

Comparing coefficients of λpμn−p shows that

1p!ΔQpf(p,q,r)=1(n−p)!ΔPn−pf(a,b,c).

In particular, the p-th polar of C with respect to Q is the locus of points P so that the (n−p)-th polar of C with respect to P passes through Q.[1]

Poles

If the polar line of C with respect to a point Q is a line L, then Q is said to be a pole of L. A given line has (n−1)2 poles (counting multiplicities etc.) where n is the degree of C. To see this, pick two points P and Q on L. The locus of points whose polar lines pass through P is the first polar of P and this is a curve of degree n−1. Similarly, the locus of points whose polar lines pass through Q is the first polar of Q and this is also a curve of degree n−1. The polar line of a point is L if and only if it contains both P and Q, so the poles of L are exactly the points of intersection of the two first polars. By Bézout's theorem these curves have (n−1)2 points of intersection and these are the poles of L.[2]

The Hessian

For a given point Q=(a, b, c), the polar conic is the locus of points P so that Q is on the second polar of P. In other words, the equation of the polar conic is

Δ(x,y,z)2f(a,b,c)=x2∂2f∂x2(a,b,c)+2xy∂2f∂x∂y(a,b,c)+…=0.

The conic is degenerate if and only if the determinant of the Hessian of f,

H(f)=[∂2f∂x2∂2f∂x∂y∂2f∂x∂z∂2f∂y∂x∂2f∂y2∂2f∂y∂z∂2f∂z∂x∂2f∂z∂y∂2f∂z2],

vanishes. Therefore, the equation |H(f)|=0 defines a curve, the locus of points whose polar conics are degenerate, of degree 3(n−2) called the Hessian curve of C.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Algebraic curves navbox

  1. ↑ Follows Salmon pp. 49-50 but essentially the same argument with different notation is given in Basset pp. 16-17.
  2. ↑ Basset p. 20, Salmon p. 51