Pascal's rule

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Distinguish In mathematics, Pascal's rule (or Pascal's formula) is a combinatorial identity about binomial coefficients. The binomial coefficients are the numbers that appear in Pascal's triangle. Pascal's rule states that for positive integers n and k, (n−1k)+(n−1k−1)=(nk), where (nk) is the binomial coefficient, namely the coefficient of the Template:Math term in the expansion of Template:Math. There is no restriction on the relative sizes of Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar;[1] in particular, the above identity remains valid when Template:Math since (nk)=0 whenever Template:Math.

Together with the boundary conditions (n0)=(nn)=1 for all nonnegative integers n, Pascal's rule determines that (nk)=n!k!(n−k)!, for all integers Template:Math. In this sense, Pascal's rule is the recurrence relation that defines the binomial coefficients.

Pascal's rule can also be generalized to apply to multinomial coefficients.

Combinatorial proof

Illustrates combinatorial proof: (41)+(42)=(52).

Pascal's rule has an intuitive combinatorial meaning, that is clearly expressed in this counting proof.[2]Template:Rp

Proof. Recall that (nk) equals the number of subsets with k elements from a set with n elements. Suppose one particular element is uniquely labeled X in a set with n elements.

To construct a subset of k elements containing X, include X and choose k − 1 elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are (n−1k−1) such subsets.

To construct a subset of k elements not containing X, choose k elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are (n−1k) such subsets.

Every subset of k elements either contains X or not. The total number of subsets with k elements in a set of n elements is the sum of the number of subsets containing X and the number of subsets that do not contain X, (n−1k−1)+(n−1k).

This equals (nk); therefore, (nk)=(n−1k−1)+(n−1k).

Algebraic proof

Alternatively, the algebraic derivation of the binomial case follows. (n−1k)+(n−1k−1)=(n−1)!k!(n−1−k)!+(n−1)!(k−1)!(n−k)!=(n−1)![n−kk!(n−k)!+kk!(n−k)!]=(n−1)!nk!(n−k)!=n!k!(n−k)!=(nk).

An alternative algebraic proof using the alternative definition of binomial coefficients: (nk)=n(n−1)⋯(n−k+1)k!. Indeed

(n−1k)+(n−1k−1)=(n−1)⋯((n−1)−k+1)k!+(n−1)⋯((n−1)−(k−1)+1)(k−1)!=(n−1)⋯(n−k)k!+(n−1)⋯(n−k+1)(k−1)!=(n−1)⋯(n−k+1)(k−1)![n−kk+1]=(n−1)⋯(n−k+1)(k−1)!⋅nk=n(n−1)⋯(n−k+1)k!=(nk).

Since (zk)=z(z−1)⋯(z−k+1)k! is used as the extended definition of the binomial coefficient when z is a complex number, thus the above alternative algebraic proof shows that Pascal's rule holds more generally when n is replaced by any complex number.

Generalization

Pascal's rule can be generalized to multinomial coefficients.[2]Template:Rp For any integer p such that p≥2, k1,k2,k3,…,kp∈ℤ+, and n=k1+k2+k3+⋯+kp≥1, (n−1k1−1,k2,k3,…,kp)+(n−1k1,k2−1,k3,…,kp)+⋯+(n−1k1,k2,k3,…,kp−1)=(nk1,k2,k3,…,kp) where (nk1,k2,k3,…,kp) is the coefficient of the x1k1x2k2⋯xpkp term in the expansion of (x1+x2+…+xp)n.

The algebraic derivation for this general case is as follows.[2]Template:Rp Let p be an integer such that p≥2, k1,k2,k3,…,kp∈ℕ+, and n=k1+k2+k3+⋯+kp≥1. Then (n−1k1−1,k2,k3,…,kp)+(n−1k1,k2−1,k3,…,kp)+⋯+(n−1k1,k2,k3,…,kp−1)=(n−1)!(k1−1)!k2!k3!⋯kp!+(n−1)!k1!(k2−1)!k3!⋯kp!+⋯+(n−1)!k1!k2!k3!⋯(kp−1)!=k1(n−1)!k1!k2!k3!⋯kp!+k2(n−1)!k1!k2!k3!⋯kp!+⋯+kp(n−1)!k1!k2!k3!⋯kp!=(k1+k2+⋯+kp)(n−1)!k1!k2!k3!⋯kp!=n(n−1)!k1!k2!k3!⋯kp!=n!k1!k2!k3!⋯kp!=(nk1,k2,k3,…,kp).

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

Template:PlanetMath attribution

Template:PlanetMath attribution