Natural logarithm of 2

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Infobox non-integer number

In mathematics, the natural logarithm of 2 is the unique real number argument such that the exponential function equals two. It appears frequently in various formulas and is also given by the alternating harmonic series. The decimal value of the natural logarithm of 2 Template:OEIS truncated at 30 decimal places is given by:

ln⁡2≈0.693147180559945309417232121458.

The logarithm of 2 in other bases is obtained with the formula

logb2=ln⁡2ln⁡b.

The common logarithm in particular is (Template:OEIS2C)

log102≈0.301029995663981195.

The inverse of this number is the binary logarithm of 10:

log210=1log102≈3.321928095 (Template:OEIS2C).

By the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem, the natural logarithm of any natural number other than 0 and 1 (more generally, of any positive algebraic number other than 1) is a transcendental number. It is also contained in the ring of algebraic periods.

Series representations

Rising alternate factorial

ln⁡2=∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n=1−12+13−14+15−16+⋯. This is the well-known "alternating harmonic series".
ln⁡2=12+12∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n(n+1).
ln⁡2=58+12∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n(n+1)(n+2).
ln⁡2=23+34∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3).
ln⁡2=131192+32∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4).
ln⁡2=661960+154∑n=1∞(−1)n+1n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)(n+5).
ln⁡2=23(1+243−4+283−8+2123−12+…).

Binary rising constant factorial

ln⁡2=∑n=1∞12nn.
ln⁡2=1−∑n=1∞12nn(n+1).
ln⁡2=12+2∑n=1∞12nn(n+1)(n+2).
ln⁡2=56−6∑n=1∞12nn(n+1)(n+2)(n+3).
ln⁡2=712+24∑n=1∞12nn(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4).
ln⁡2=4760−120∑n=1∞12nn(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)(n+5).

Other series representations

∑n=0∞1(2n+1)(2n+2)=ln⁡2.
∑n=1∞1n(4n2−1)=2ln⁡2−1.
∑n=1∞(−1)nn(4n2−1)=ln⁡2−1.
∑n=1∞(−1)nn(9n2−1)=2ln⁡2−32.
∑n=1∞14n2−2n=ln⁡2.
∑n=1∞2(−1)n+1(2n−1)+18n2−4n=ln⁡2.
∑n=0∞(−1)n3n+1=ln⁡23+π33.
∑n=0∞(−1)n3n+2=−ln⁡23+π33.
∑n=0∞(−1)n(3n+1)(3n+2)=2ln⁡23.
∑n=1∞1∑k=1nk2=18−24ln⁡2 using limN→∞∑n=N2N1n=ln⁡2
∑n=1∞14n2−3n=ln⁡2+π6 (sums of the reciprocals of decagonal numbers)

Involving the Riemann Zeta function

∑n=1∞1n[ζ(2n)−1]=ln⁡2.
∑n=2∞12n[ζ(n)−1]=ln⁡2−12.
∑n=1∞12n+1[ζ(2n+1)−1]=1−γ−ln⁡22.
∑n=1∞122n−1(2n+1)ζ(2n)=1−ln⁡2.

(Template:Math is the Euler–Mascheroni constant and Template:Math Riemann's zeta function.)

BBP-type representations

ln⁡2=23+12∑k=1∞(12k+14k+1+18k+4+116k+12)116k.

(See more about Bailey–Borwein–Plouffe (BBP)-type representations.)

Applying the three general series for natural logarithm to 2 directly gives:

ln⁡2=∑n=1∞(−1)n−1n.
ln⁡2=∑n=1∞12nn.
ln⁡2=23∑k=0∞19k(2k+1).

Applying them to 2=32⋅43 gives:

ln⁡2=∑n=1∞(−1)n−12nn+∑n=1∞(−1)n−13nn.
ln⁡2=∑n=1∞13nn+∑n=1∞14nn.
ln⁡2=25∑k=0∞125k(2k+1)+27∑k=0∞149k(2k+1).

Applying them to 2=(2)2 gives:

ln⁡2=2∑n=1∞(−1)n−1(2+1)nn.
ln⁡2=2∑n=1∞1(2+2)nn.
ln⁡2=43+22∑k=0∞1(17+122)k(2k+1).

Applying them to 2=(1615)7⋅(8180)3⋅(2524)5 gives:

ln⁡2=7∑n=1∞(−1)n−115nn+3∑n=1∞(−1)n−180nn+5∑n=1∞(−1)n−124nn.
ln⁡2=7∑n=1∞116nn+3∑n=1∞181nn+5∑n=1∞125nn.
ln⁡2=1431∑k=0∞1961k(2k+1)+6161∑k=0∞125921k(2k+1)+1049∑k=0∞12401k(2k+1).

Representation as integrals

The natural logarithm of 2 occurs frequently as the result of integration. Some explicit formulas for it include:

∫01dx1+x=∫12dxx=ln⁡2
∫0∞e−x1−e−xxdx=ln⁡2
∫0∞2−xdx=1ln⁡2
∫0π3tan⁡xdx=2∫0π4tan⁡xdx=ln⁡2
−1πi∫0∞ln⁡xln⁡ln⁡x(x+1)2dx=ln⁡2

Other representations

The Pierce expansion is Template:OEIS2C

ln⁡2=1−11⋅3+11⋅3⋅12−⋯.

The Engel expansion is Template:OEIS2C

ln⁡2=12+12⋅3+12⋅3⋅7+12⋅3⋅7⋅9+⋯.

The cotangent expansion is Template:OEIS2C

ln⁡2=cot⁡(arccot⁡(0)−arccot⁡(1)+arccot⁡(5)−arccot⁡(55)+arccot⁡(14187)−⋯).

The simple continued fraction expansion is Template:OEIS2C

ln⁡2=[0;1,2,3,1,6,3,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,3,10,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,3,2,3,1,...],

which yields rational approximations, the first few of which are 0, 1, 2/3, 7/10, 9/13 and 61/88.

This generalized continued fraction:

ln⁡2=[0;1,2,3,1,5,23,7,12,9,25,...,2k−1,2k,...],[1]
also expressible as
ln⁡2=11+12+13+22+25+32+37+42+⋱=23−129−2215−3221−⋱

The following continued fraction representation (J.L.Lagrange) gives (asymptotically) 1.53 new correct decimal places per cycle: [2][3]

ln⁡2=12L0,Lk=2k+1+k+12+k+1Lk+1

or

ln⁡2=2G0,Gk=6k+3−(k+1)2Gk+1

Bootstrapping other logarithms

Given a value of Template:Math, a scheme of computing the logarithms of other integers is to tabulate the logarithms of the prime numbers and in the next layer the logarithms of the composite numbers Template:Math based on their factorizations

c=2i3j5k7l⋯→ln⁡(c)=iln⁡(2)+jln⁡(3)+kln⁡(5)+lln⁡(7)+⋯

This employs

Prime Approximate natural logarithm OEIS
2 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
3 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
5 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
7 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
11 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
13 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
17 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
19 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
23 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
29 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
31 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
37 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
41 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
43 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
47 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
53 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
59 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
61 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
67 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
71 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
73 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
79 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
83 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
89 Template:Val Template:OEIS link
97 Template:Val Template:OEIS link

In a third layer, the logarithms of rational numbers Template:Math are computed with Template:Math, and logarithms of roots via Template:Math.

The logarithm of 2 is useful in the sense that the powers of 2 are rather densely distributed; finding powers Template:Math close to powers Template:Math of other numbers Template:Math is comparatively easy, and series representations of Template:Math are found by coupling 2 to Template:Math with logarithmic conversions.

Example

If Template:Math with some small Template:Math, then Template:Math and therefore

sln⁡p−tln⁡q=ln⁡(1+dqt)=∑m=1∞(−1)m+1m(dqt)m=∑n=0∞22n+1(d2qt+d)2n+1.

Selecting Template:Math represents Template:Math by Template:Math and a series of a parameter Template:Math that one wishes to keep small for quick convergence. Taking Template:Math, for example, generates

2ln⁡3=3ln⁡2−∑k≥1(−1)k8kk=3ln⁡2+∑n=0∞22n+1(12⋅8+1)2n+1.

This is actually the third line in the following table of expansions of this type:

Template:Math Template:Math Template:Math Template:Math Template:Math
1 3 1 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 3 2 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
2 3 3 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
5 3 8 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
12 3 19 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 5 2 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
3 5 7 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
1 7 2 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 7 3 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
5 7 14 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 11 3 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
2 11 7 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
11 11 38 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 13 3 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 13 4 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
3 13 11 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
7 13 26 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
10 13 37 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 17 4 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 19 4 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
4 19 17 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
1 23 4 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 23 5 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
2 23 9 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 29 4 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 29 5 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
7 29 34 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 31 5 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
1 37 5 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
4 37 21 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
5 37 26 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 41 5 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
2 41 11 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
3 41 16 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 43 5 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
2 43 11 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
5 43 27 2 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
7 43 38 2 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…

Starting from the natural logarithm of Template:Math one might use these parameters:

Template:Math Template:Math Template:Math Template:Math Template:Math
10 2 3 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
21 3 10 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
3 5 2 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
10 5 7 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
6 7 5 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
13 7 11 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
1 11 1 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 13 1 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
8 13 9 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
9 13 10 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
1 17 1 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
4 17 5 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
9 17 11 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
3 19 4 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
4 19 5 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
7 19 9 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
2 23 3 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
3 23 4 10 Template:Sfrac = Template:0Template:Val…
2 29 3 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…
2 31 3 10 −Template:Sfrac = −Template:Val…

Known digits

This is a table of recent records in calculating digits of Template:Math. As of December 2018, it has been calculated to more digits than any other natural logarithm[4][5] of a natural number, except that of 1.

Date Name Number of digits
January 7, 2009 A.Yee & R.Chan 15,500,000,000
February 4, 2009 A.Yee & R.Chan 31,026,000,000
February 21, 2011 Alexander Yee 50,000,000,050
May 14, 2011 Shigeru Kondo 100,000,000,000
February 28, 2014 Shigeru Kondo 200,000,000,050
July 12, 2015 Ron Watkins 250,000,000,000
January 30, 2016 Ron Watkins 350,000,000,000
April 18, 2016 Ron Watkins 500,000,000,000
December 10, 2018 Michael Kwok 600,000,000,000
April 26, 2019 Jacob Riffee 1,000,000,000,000
August 19, 2020 Seungmin Kim[6][7] 1,200,000,000,100
September 9, 2021 William Echols[8] 1,500,000,000,000
February 12, 2024 Jordan Ranous[9] 3,000,000,000,000
November 15, 2025 Mamdouh Barakat[10] 3,100,000,000,000

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Irrational number

  1. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  2. ↑ A. N. Khovanski, The applications of continued fractions and their Generalisation to problemes in approximation theory,1963, Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands
  3. ↑ Mathematical Analysis Functions, Limits, Series, Continued Fractions. Edited by L.A. Lyusternik and A. R. Yanpol’Skii Translated by D. E. Brown, Translation edited by E. Spence, 1965, p.273. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, Edinburgh, New York
  4. ↑ Template:Cite web
  5. ↑ Template:Cite web
  6. ↑ Template:Cite web
  7. ↑ Template:Cite web
  8. ↑ Template:Cite web
  9. ↑ Template:Cite web
  10. ↑ Template:Cite web