Mixed Hodge structure

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In algebraic geometry, a mixed Hodge structure is an algebraic structure containing information about the cohomology of general algebraic varieties. It is a generalization of a Hodge structure, which is used to study smooth projective varieties.

In mixed Hodge theory, where the decomposition of a cohomology group Hk(X) may have subspaces of different weights, i.e. as a direct sum of Hodge structures

Hk(X)=⨁i(Hi,Fi∙)

where each of the Hodge structures have weight ki. One of the early hints that such structures should exist comes from the long exact sequence …→Hi−1(Y)→Hci(U)→Hi(X)→…associated to a pair of smooth projective varieties Y⊂X. This sequence suggests that the cohomology groups Hci(U) (for U=X−Y) should have differing weights coming from both Hi−1(Y) and Hi(X).

Template:TOC limit

Motivation

Originally, Hodge structures were introduced as a tool for keeping track of abstract Hodge decompositions on the cohomology groups of smooth projective algebraic varieties. These structures gave geometers new tools for studying algebraic curves, such as the Torelli theorem, Abelian varieties, and the cohomology of smooth projective varieties. One of the chief results for computing Hodge structures is an explicit decomposition of the cohomology groups of smooth hypersurfaces using the relation between the Jacobian ideal and the Hodge decomposition of a smooth projective hypersurface through Griffith's residue theorem. Porting this language to smooth non-projective varieties and singular varieties requires the concept of mixed Hodge structures.

Definition

A mixed Hodge structure[1] (MHS) is a triple (Hℤ,W∙,F∙) such that

  1. Hℤ is a ℤ-module of finite type
  2. W∙ is an increasing ℤ-filtration on Hℚ=Hℤ⊗ℚ, ⋯⊂W0⊂W1⊂W2⊂⋯
  3. F∙ is a decreasing ℕ-filtration on Hℂ, Hℂ=F0⊃F1⊃F2⊃⋯

where the induced filtration of F∙ on the graded pieces

GrkWHℚ=WkHℚWk−1Hℚ

are pure Hodge structures of weight k.

Remark on filtrations

Note that similar to Hodge structures, mixed Hodge structures use a filtration instead of a direct sum decomposition since the cohomology groups with anti-holomorphic terms, Hp,q where q>0, don't vary holomorphically. But, the filtrations can vary holomorphically, giving a better defined structure.

Morphisms of mixed Hodge structures

Morphisms of mixed Hodge structures are defined by maps of abelian groups

f:(Hℤ,W∙,F∙)→(Hℤ′,W∙′,F'∙)

such that

f(Wl)⊂W'l

and the induced map of ℂ-vector spaces has the property

fℂ(Fp)⊂F'p

Further definitions and properties

Hodge numbers

The Hodge numbers of a MHS are defined as the dimensions

hp,q(Hℤ)=dimℂGrF∙pGrp+qW∙Hℂ

since Grp+qW∙Hℂ is a weight (p+q) Hodge structure, and

GrpF∙=FpFp+1

is the (p,q)-component of a weight (p+q) Hodge structure.

Homological properties

There is an Abelian category[2] of mixed Hodge structures which has vanishing Ext-groups whenever the cohomological degree is greater than 1: that is, given mixed hodge structures (Hℤ,W∙,F∙),(Hℤ′,W∙′,F'∙) the groups

ExtMHSp((Hℤ,W∙,F∙),(Hℤ′,W∙′,F'∙))=0

for p≥2[2]pg 83.

Mixed Hodge structures on bi-filtered complexes

Many mixed Hodge structures can be constructed from a bifiltered complex. This includes complements of smooth varieties defined by the complement of a normal crossing variety. Given a complex of sheaves of abelian groups A∙ and filtrations W∙,F∙[1] of the complex, meaning

d(WiA∙)⊂WiA∙d(FiA∙)⊂FiA∙

There is an induced mixed Hodge structure on the hyperhomology groups

(ℍk(X,A∙),W∙,F∙)

from the bi-filtered complex (A∙,W∙,F∙). Such a bi-filtered complex is called a mixed Hodge complex.[1]Template:Rp

Logarithmic complex

Given a smooth variety U⊂X where D=X−U is a normal crossing divisor (meaning all intersections of components are complete intersections), there are filtrations on the logarithmic de Rham complex ΩX∙(log⁡D) given by

WmΩXi(log⁡D)={ΩXi(log⁡D) if i≤mΩXi−m∧ΩXm(log⁡D) if 0≤m≤i0 if m<0FpΩXi(log⁡D)={ΩXi(log⁡D) if p≤i0 otherwise

It turns out these filtrations define a natural mixed Hodge structure on the cohomology group Hn(U,ℂ) from the mixed Hodge complex defined on the logarithmic complex ΩX∙(log⁡D).

Smooth compactifications

The above construction of the logarithmic complex extends to every smooth variety; and the mixed Hodge structure is isomorphic under any such compactificaiton. Note a smooth compactification of a smooth variety U is defined as a smooth variety X and an embedding U↪X such that D=X−U is a normal crossing divisor. That is, given compactifications U⊂X,X′ with boundary divisors D=X−U, D′=X′−U there is an isomorphism of mixed Hodge structure

(ℍk(X,ΩX∙(log⁡D)),W∙,F∙)≅(ℍk(X′,ΩX′∙(log⁡D′)),W∙,F∙)

showing the mixed Hodge structure is invariant under smooth compactification.[2]

Example

For example, on a genus 0 plane curve C logarithmic cohomology of C with the normal crossing divisor {p1,…,pk} with k≥1 can be easily computed[3] since the terms of the complex ΩC∙(log⁡D) equal to

𝒪C→dΩC1(log⁡D)

are both acyclic. Then, the Hypercohomology is just

Γ(𝒪ℙ1)→dΓ(Ωℙ1(log⁡D))

the first vector space are just the constant sections, hence the differential is the zero map. The second is the vector space is isomorphic to the vector space spanned by

ℂ⋅dxx−p1⊕⋯⊕ℂdxx−pk−1

Then ℍ1(ΩC1(log⁡D)) has a weight 2 mixed Hodge structure and ℍ0(ΩC1(log⁡D)) has a weight 0 mixed Hodge structure.

Examples

Complement of a smooth projective curve by two points

We give here the simplest example which isolates the phenomenon at hand. We will explain the MHS on (a twist of) H1(U,ℤ) where U is the complement of a smooth projective curve by two points.

Let X be a smooth proper (hence projective) curve over ℂ and let Z:={x,y} be two points in X. We get a so called recollement situation

i:Z↪X↩U:j

where U:=X−Z.

One has an exact triangle of constructible sheaves on X

i∗i!ℤX→ℤX→Rj∗j∗ℤX→+

The purity isomorphism (coming from Verdier duality) identifies i!ℤX=i∗ℤX[−2](−1), whence the relevant terms of the exact triangle upon taking cohomology give us the exact sequence of MHS


0→H1(X,ℤ)→H1(U,ℤ)→H0(Z,ℤ)(−1)→H2(X,ℤ)→0


Rationalizing, and noting that H2(X,ℚ)=ℚ(−1), we get a sequence of rational MHS

0→H1(X,ℚ)(1)→H1(U,ℚ)(1)→ℚ→0

We may now read off the weight filtration on H1(U,ℚ)(1) as follows: in filtered degree −2 we have W−2H1(U,ℚ)(1)=0, in filtered degree −1 we have W−1H1(U,ℚ)(1)=H1(X,ℚ)(1) and in filtered degree 0 we have W0H1(U,ℚ)(1)=H1(U,ℚ)(1).

It remains to check that the graded pieces have the correct weights. But it is immediate from the exact sequence of rational MHS above that GriW(H1(U,ℚ)(1)) is pure of weight i for i∈{−1,0}. Note that if the genus of the curve X is greater than 0, then indeed the graded for i=−1 is non-zero.

Complement of a smooth projective variety by a closed subvariety

Given a smooth projective variety X of dimension n and a closed subvariety Y⊂X there is a long exact sequence in cohomology[4]pg7-8

⋯→Hcm(U;ℤ)→Hm(X;ℤ)→Hm(Y;ℤ)→Hcm+1(U;ℤ)→⋯

coming from the distinguished triangle

𝐑j!ℤU→ℤX→i∗ℤY→[+1]

of constructible sheaves. There is another long exact sequence

⋯→H2n−mBM(Y;ℤ)(−n)→Hm(X;ℤ)→Hm(U;ℤ)→H2n−m−1BM(Y;ℤ)(−n)→⋯

from the distinguished triangle

i∗i!ℤX→ℤX→𝐑j∗ℤU→[+1]

whenever X is smooth. Note the homology groups HkBM(X) are called Borel–Moore homology, which are dual to cohomology for general spaces and the (n) means tensoring with the Tate structure ℤ(1)⊗n add weight −2n to the weight filtration. The smoothness hypothesis is required because Verdier duality implies i!DX=DY, and DX≅ℤX[2n] whenever X is smooth. Also, the dualizing complex for X has weight n, hence DX≅ℤX[2n](n). Also, the maps from Borel-Moore homology must be twisted by up to weight (n) is order for it to have a map to Hm(X). Also, there is the perfect duality pairing

H2n−mBM(Y)×Hm(Y)→ℤ

giving an isomorphism of the two groups.

Algebraic torus

A one dimensional algebraic torus 𝕋 is isomorphic to the variety ℙ1−{0,∞}, hence its cohomology groups are isomorphic to

H0(𝕋)⊕H1(𝕋)≅ℤ⊕ℤ

The long exact exact sequence then reads

H2BM(Y)(−1)→H0(ℙ1)→H0(𝔾m)→ H1BM(Y)(−1)→H1(ℙ1)→H1(𝔾m)→ H0BM(Y)(−1)→H2(ℙ1)→H2(𝔾m)→0

Since H1(ℙ1)=0 and H2(𝔾m)=0 this gives the exact sequence

0→H1(𝔾m)→H0BM(Y)(−1)→H2(ℙ1)→0

since there is a twisting of weights for well-defined maps of mixed Hodge structures, there is the isomorphism

H1(𝔾m)≅ℤ(−1)

Quartic K3 surface minus a genus 3 curve

Given a quartic K3 surface X, and a genus 3 curve i:C↪X defined by the vanishing locus of a generic section of 𝒪X(1), hence it is isomorphic to a degree 4 plane curve, which has genus 3. Then, the Gysin sequence gives the long exact sequence

→Hk−2(C)→γkHk(X)→i∗Hk(U)→RHk−1(C)→

But, it is a result that the maps γk take a Hodge class of type (p,q) to a Hodge class of type (p+1,q+1).[5] The Hodge structures for both the K3 surface and the curve are well-known, and can be computed using the Jacobian ideal. In the case of the curve there are two zero maps

γ3:H1,0(C)→H2,1(X)=0 γ3:H0,1(C)→H1,2(X)=0

hence H2(U) contains the weight one pieces H1,0(C)⊕H0,1(C). Because H2(X)=Hprim2(X)⊕ℂ⋅𝕃 has dimension 22, but the Leftschetz class 𝕃 is killed off by the map

γ2:H0(C)→H2(X)

sending the (0,0) class in H0(C) to the (1,1) class in H2(X). Then the primitive cohomology group Hprim2(X) is the weight 2 piece of H2(U). Therefore,

Gr2W∙H2(U)=Hprim2(X)Gr1W∙H2(U)=H1(C)GrkW∙H2(U)=0k≠1,2

The induced filtrations on these graded pieces are the Hodge filtrations coming from each cohomology group.

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Template:Cite book
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Template:Cite book
  3. ↑ Note we are using Bézout's theorem since this can be given as the complement of the intersection with a hyperplane.
  4. ↑ Template:Cite web
  5. ↑ Template:Cite book

Examples

In Mirror Symmetry