Lindhard theory

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Not to be confused with


In condensed matter physics, Lindhard theory[1] is a method of calculating the effects of electric field screening by electrons in a solid. It is based on quantum mechanics (first-order perturbation theory) and the random phase approximation. It is named after Danish physicist Jens Lindhard, who first developed the theory in 1954.[2][3][4]

Thomas–Fermi screening and the plasma oscillations can be derived as a special case of the more general Lindhard formula. In particular, Thomas–Fermi screening is the limit of the Lindhard formula when the wavevector (the reciprocal of the length-scale of interest) is much smaller than the Fermi wavevector, i.e. the long-distance limit.[1] The Lorentz–Drude expression for the plasma oscillations are recovered in the dynamic case (long wavelengths, finite frequency).

This article uses cgs-Gaussian units.

Formula

The Lindhard formula for the longitudinal dielectric function is given by

ϵ(πͺ,ω)=1Vπͺ𝐀f𝐀πͺf𝐀(ω+iδ)+E𝐀πͺE𝐀.

Here, δ is a positive infinitesimal constant, Vπͺ is Veff(πͺ)Vind(πͺ) and f𝐀 is the carrier distribution function which is the Fermi–Dirac distribution function for electrons in thermodynamic equilibrium. However this Lindhard formula is valid also for nonequilibrium distribution functions. It can be obtained by first-order perturbation theory and the random phase approximation (RPA).

Limiting cases

To understand the Lindhard formula, consider some limiting cases in 2 and 3 dimensions. The 1-dimensional case is also considered in other ways.

Long wavelength limit

In the long wavelength limit (πͺ0), Lindhard function reduces to

ϵ(πͺ=0,ω)1ωpl2ω2,

where ωpl2=4πe2NL3m is the three-dimensional plasma frequency (in SI units, replace the factor 4π by 1/ϵ0.) For two-dimensional systems,

ωpl2(πͺ)=2πe2nqϵm.

This result recovers the plasma oscillations from the classical dielectric function from Drude model and from quantum mechanical free electron model.

Template:Hidden begin For the denominator of the Lindhard formula, we get

E𝐀πͺE𝐀=22m(k22𝐀πͺ+q2)2k22m2𝐀πͺm,

and for the numerator of the Lindhard formula, we get

f𝐀πͺf𝐀=f𝐀πͺ𝐀f𝐀+f𝐀πͺ𝐀f𝐀.

Inserting these into the Lindhard formula and taking the δ0 limit, we obtain

ϵ(πͺ=0,ω0)1+Vπͺ𝐀,iqif𝐀kiω02𝐀πͺm1+Vπͺω0𝐀,iqif𝐀ki(1+𝐀πͺmω0)1+Vπͺω0𝐀,iqif𝐀ki𝐀πͺmω0=1Vπͺq2mω02𝐀f𝐀=1Vπͺq2Nmω02=14πe2ϵq2L3q2Nmω02=1ωpl2ω02.,

where we used E𝐀=ω𝐀 and Vπͺ=4πe2ϵq2L3. Template:Hidden end Template:Hidden begin First, consider the long wavelength limit (q0).

For the denominator of the Lindhard formula,

E𝐀πͺE𝐀=22m(k22𝐀πͺ+q2)2k22m2𝐀πͺm,

and for the numerator,

f𝐀πͺf𝐀=f𝐀πͺ𝐀f𝐀+f𝐀πͺ𝐀f𝐀.

Inserting these into the Lindhard formula and taking the limit of δ0, we obtain

ϵ(0,ω)1+Vπͺ𝐀,iqif𝐀kiω02𝐀πͺm1+Vπͺω0𝐀,iqif𝐀ki(1+𝐀πͺmω0)1+Vπͺω0𝐀,iqif𝐀ki𝐀πͺmω0=1+Vπͺω02d2k(L2π)2i,jqif𝐀kikjqjmω0=1+VπͺL2mω022d2k(2π)2i,jqiqjkjf𝐀ki=1+VπͺL2mω02i,jqiqj2d2k(2π)2kjf𝐀ki=1VπͺL2mω02i,jqiqjnδij=12πe2ϵqL2L2mω02q2n=1ωpl2(πͺ)ω02,

where we used E𝐀=ϵ𝐀, Vπͺ=2πe2ϵqL2 and ωpl2(πͺ)=2πe2nqϵm. Template:Hidden end

Static limit

Consider the static limit (ω+iδ0).

The Lindhard formula becomes

ϵ(πͺ,ω=0)=1Vπͺ𝐀f𝐀πͺf𝐀E𝐀πͺE𝐀.

Inserting the above equalities for the denominator and numerator, we obtain

ϵ(πͺ,0)=1Vπͺ𝐀,iqifki2𝐀πͺm=1Vπͺ𝐀,iqifki2𝐀πͺm.

Assuming a thermal equilibrium Fermi–Dirac carrier distribution, we get

iqif𝐀ki=iqif𝐀μE𝐀ki=iqiki2mf𝐀μ

here, we used E𝐀=2k22m and E𝐀ki=2kim.

Therefore,

ϵ(πͺ,0)=1+Vπͺ𝐀,iqiki2mf𝐀μ2𝐀πͺm=1+Vπͺ𝐀f𝐀μ=1+4πe2ϵq2μ1L3𝐀f𝐀=1+4πe2ϵq2μNL3=1+4πe2ϵq2nμ1+κ2q2.

Here,

κ

is the 3D screening wave number (3D inverse screening length) defined as

κ=4πe2ϵnμ

.

Then, the 3D statically screened Coulomb potential is given by

Vs(πͺ,ω=0)Vπͺϵ(πͺ,0)=4πe2ϵq2L3q2+κ2q2=4πe2ϵL31q2+κ2.

And the inverse Fourier transformation of this result gives

Vs(r)=πͺ4πe2L3(q2+κ2)eiπͺ𝐫=e2reκr

known as the Yukawa potential. Note that in this Fourier transformation, which is basically a sum over all πͺ, we used the expression for small |πͺ| for every value of πͺ which is not correct.

Statically screened potential(upper curved surface) and Coulomb potential(lower curved surface) in three dimensions

For a degenerated Fermi gas (T=0), the Fermi energy is given by

EF=22m(3π2n)23,

So the density is

n=13π2(2m2EF)32.

At T=0, EFμ, so nμ=32nEF.

Inserting this into the above 3D screening wave number equation, we obtain

κ=4πe2ϵnμ=6πe2nϵEF.

This result recovers the 3D wave number from Thomas–Fermi screening.

For reference, Debye–HΓΌckel screening describes the non-degenerate limit case. The result is κ=4πe2nβϵ, known as the 3D Debye–HΓΌckel screening wave number.

In two dimensions, the screening wave number is

κ=2πe2ϵnμ=2πe2ϵm2π(1e2βπn/m)=2me22ϵfk=0.

Note that this result is independent of n.


Template:Hidden begin Consider the static limit (ω+iδ0). The Lindhard formula becomes

ϵ(πͺ,0)=1Vπͺ𝐀f𝐀πͺf𝐀E𝐀πͺE𝐀.

Inserting the above equalities for the denominator and numerator, we obtain

ϵ(πͺ,0)=1Vπͺ𝐀,iqifki2𝐀πͺm=1Vπͺ𝐀,iqifki2𝐀πͺm.

Assuming a thermal equilibrium Fermi–Dirac carrier distribution, we get

iqif𝐀ki=iqif𝐀μE𝐀ki=iqiki2mf𝐀μ.

Therefore,

ϵ(πͺ,0)=1+Vπͺ𝐀,iqiki2mf𝐀μ2𝐀πͺm=1+Vπͺ𝐀f𝐀μ=1+2πe2ϵqL2μ𝐀f𝐀=1+2πe2ϵqμNL2=1+2πe2ϵqnμ1+κq.
κ

is 2D screening wave number(2D inverse screening length) defined as

κ=2πe2ϵnμ

.

Then, the 2D statically screened Coulomb potential is given by

Vs(πͺ,ω=0)Vπͺϵ(πͺ,0)=2πe2ϵqL2qq+κ=2πe2ϵL21q+κ.

It is known that the chemical potential of the 2-dimensional Fermi gas is given by

μ(n,T)=1βln(e2βπn/m1),

and μn=2πm11e2βπn/m. Template:Hidden end

Experiments on one dimensional systems

This time, consider some generalized case for lowering the dimension. The lower the dimension is, the weaker the screening effect. In lower dimension, some of the field lines pass through the barrier material wherein the screening has no effect. For the 1-dimensional case, we can guess that the screening affects only the field lines which are very close to the wire axis.

In real experiment, we should also take the 3D bulk screening effect into account even though we deal with 1D case like the single filament. The Thomas–Fermi screening has been applied to an electron gas confined to a filament and a coaxial cylinder.[5] For a K2Pt(CN)4Cl0.32Β·2.6H20 filament, it was found that the potential within the region between the filament and cylinder varies as ekeffr/r and its effective screening length is about 10 times that of metallic platinum.[5]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

General

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Thomson Learning, Toronto, 1976)
  2. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  3. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  4. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite journal