Legendre's conjecture

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Legendre's conjecture, proposed by Adrien-Marie Legendre, states that there is a prime number between n2 and (n+1)2 for every positive integer n. [1] The conjecture is one of Landau's problems (1912) on prime numbers, and is one of many open problems on the spacing of prime numbers.

Template:Unsolved

Prime gaps

If Legendre's conjecture is true, the gap between any prime p and the next largest prime would be O(p), as expressed in big O notation.Template:Efn It is one of a family of results and conjectures related to prime gaps, that is, to the spacing between prime numbers. Others include Bertrand's postulate, on the existence of a prime between n and 2n, Oppermann's conjecture on the existence of primes between n2, n(n+1), and (n+1)2, Andrica's conjecture and Brocard's conjecture on the existence of primes between squares of consecutive primes, and Cramér's conjecture that the gaps are always much smaller, of the order (logp)2. If Cramér's conjecture is true, Legendre's conjecture would follow for all sufficiently large n. Harald Cramér also proved that the Riemann hypothesis implies a weaker bound of O(plogp) on the size of the largest prime gaps.[2]

Plot of the number of primes between n2 and (n + 1)2 Template:OEIS2C

By the prime number theorem, the expected number of primes between n2 and (n+1)2 is approximately n/lnn, and it is additionally known that for almost all intervals of this form the actual number of primes (Template:OEIS2C) is asymptotic to this expected number.[3] Since this number is large for large n, this lends credence to Legendre's conjecture.[4] It is known that the prime number theorem gives an accurate count of the primes within short intervals, either unconditionally[5] or based on the Riemann hypothesis,[6] but the lengths of the intervals for which this has been proven are longer than the intervals between consecutive squares, too long to prove Legendre's conjecture.

Partial results

It follows from a result by Ingham that for all sufficiently large n, there is a prime between the consecutive cubes n3 and (n+1)3.[7][8] Dudek proved that this holds for all nee33.3.[9]

Dudek also proved that for m=4.971×109 and any positive integer n, there is a prime between nm and (n+1)m. Mattner lowered this to m=1438989 [10] which was further reduced to m=155 by Cully-Hugill.[11]

Baker, Harman, and Pintz proved that there is a prime in the interval [xx21/40,x] for all large x.[12]

A table of maximal prime gaps shows that the conjecture holds to at least n2=41018, meaning n=2109.[13]

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Prime number conjectures


Template:Numtheory-stub

  1. Template:Cite book
  2. Template:Citation.
  3. Template:Citation
  4. Template:Citation; see p. 52, "It appears doubtful that this super-abundance of primes can be clustered in such a way so as to avoid appearing at least once between consecutive squares."
  5. Template:Citation
  6. Template:Citation
  7. Template:OEIS2C
  8. Template:Cite journal
  9. Template:Citation
  10. Template:Cite thesis
  11. Template:Cite journal
  12. Template:Citation
  13. Template:Citation.