Lebesgue's number lemma

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In topology, the Lebesgue covering lemma is a useful tool in the study of compact metric spaces.

Given an open cover of a compact metric space X, a Lebesgue's number of the cover is a number δ>0 such that every subset of X having diameter less than δ is contained in some member of the cover.

The existence of Lebesgue's numbers for compact metric spaces is given by the Lebesgue's covering lemma:

If the metric space (X,d) is compact and an open cover of X is given, then the cover admits some Lebesgue's number δ>0.

The notion of Lebesgue's numbers itself is useful in other applications as well.

Proof

Direct proof

Let 𝒰 be an open cover of X. Since X is compact we can extract a finite subcover {A1,…,An}⊆𝒰. If any one of the Ai's equals X then any δ>0 will serve as a Lebesgue's number. Otherwise for each i∈{1,…,n}, let Ci:=X∖Ai, note that Ci is not empty, and define a function f:X→ℝ by

f(x):=1n∑i=1nd(x,Ci).

Since f is continuous on a compact set, it attains a minimum δ. The key observation is that, since every x is contained in some Ai, the extreme value theorem shows δ>0. Now we can verify that this δ is the desired Lebesgue's number. If Y is a subset of X of diameter less than δ, choose x0 as any point in Y, then by definition of diameter, Y⊆Bδ(x0), where Bδ(x0) denotes the ball of radius δ centered at x0. Since f(x0)≥δ there must exist at least one i such that d(x0,Ci)≥δ. But this means that Bδ(x0)⊆Ai and so, in particular, Y⊆Ai.

Proof by contradiction

Suppose for contradiction that X is sequentially compact, {Uα∣α∈J} is an open cover of X, and the Lebesgue number δ does not exist. That is: for all δ>0, there exists A⊂X with diam⁡(A)<δ such that there does not exist β∈J with A⊂Uβ.

This enables us to perform the following construction:

δ1=1,∃A1⊂Xwherediam⁡(A1)<δ1and¬∃β(A1⊂Uβ)
δ2=12,∃A2⊂Xwherediam⁡(A2)<δ2and¬∃β(A2⊂Uβ)
⋮
δk=1k,∃Ak⊂Xwherediam⁡(Ak)<δkand¬∃β(Ak⊂Uβ)
⋮


Note that An≠∅ for all n∈ℤ+, since An⊄Uβ. It is therefore possible by the axiom of choice to construct a sequence (xn) in which xi∈Ai for each i. Since X is sequentially compact, there exists a subsequence {xnk} (with k∈ℤ>0) that converges to x0.

Because {Uα} is an open cover, there exists some α0∈J such that x0∈Uα0. As Uα0 is open, there exists r>0 with Br(x0)⊂Uα0. Now we invoke the convergence of the subsequence {xnk}: there exists L∈ℤ+ such that L≤k implies xnk∈Br/2(x0).

Furthermore, there exists M∈ℤ>0 such that δM=1M<r2. Hence for all z∈ℤ>0, we have M≤z implies diam⁡(AM)<r2.

Finally, define q∈ℤ>0 such that nq≥M and q≥L. For all x′∈Anq, notice that:

  • d(xnq,x′)≤diam⁡(Anq)<r2, because nq≥M.
  • d(xnq,x0)<r2, because q≥L entails xnq∈Br/2(x0).

Hence d(x0,x′)<r by the triangle inequality, which implies that Anq⊂Uα0. This yields the desired contradiction.

References

Template:Metric spaces Template:Topology-stub