Hilbert's fourteenth problem
Template:Short description In mathematics, Hilbert's fourteenth problem, the fourteenth of Hilbert's problems proposed in 1900, asks whether certain algebras are finitely generated.
Let be a field and let be a subfield of the field of rational functions
containing . Hilbert asked whether the -algebra
is always finitely generated over .[1]
The answer is negative in general, but depends strongly on dimension. Writing for the transcendence degree of over , Template:Harvs proved that is finitely generated whenever ; in particular, the answer is affirmative for .[2] Masayoshi Nagata constructed the first counterexamples in 1958, one of which he announced at the 1958 International Congress of Mathematicians; his first construction has and .[3][4]
In characteristic zero, Shigeru Kuroda subsequently constructed counterexamples with and in 2004, and with in 2005.[5][6] Thus the bounds are sharp: finite generation always holds when or , whereas counterexamples already occur with .
History
The problem originally arose in algebraic invariant theory. Here the ring is given as a (suitably defined) ring of polynomial invariants of a linear algebraic group over a field acting algebraically on a polynomial ring (or more generally, on a finitely generated algebra defined over a field).
In this situation the field is the field of rational functions (quotients of polynomials) in the variables which are invariant under the given action of the algebraic group, and the ring is the ring of polynomials which are invariant under the action.
A classical example in the nineteenth century was the extensive study (in particular by Cayley, Sylvester, Clebsch, Paul Gordan and also Hilbert) of invariants of binary forms in two variables under the natural action of the special linear group .
Hilbert proved finite-generation results for invariant rings arising from important classical group actions in characteristic zero. These results were subsequently extended, notably by Hermann Weyl, and in modern form invariant rings of reductive algebraic groups acting on finitely generated algebras are finitely generated. By contrast, invariant rings of non-reductive groups need not be finitely generated; Nagata's counterexample is a suitably constructed ring of invariants for a linear action of a non-reductive linear algebraic group.
A major ingredient in Hilbert's proof is the Hilbert basis theorem applied to the ideal inside the polynomial ring generated by the invariants.
Zariski's formulation
Zariski gave an algebro-geometric formulation of Hilbert's fourteenth problem in terms of quasi-affine varieties. More precisely, the rings of global regular functions on irreducible normal quasi-affine varieties are, up to isomorphism, precisely the rings of the form , where is a normal finitely generated -domain and is a subfield of its field of fractions containing .[7] Thus Hilbert's question can equivalently be viewed as asking whether the ring of global regular functions on such a quasi-affine variety must be finitely generated.
Template:Harvtxt proved that is finitely generated when . In particular, Hilbert's original problem has an affirmative answer for . See also Zariski's finiteness theorem.
Nagata's counterexample
Nagata constructed the first counterexamples to Hilbert's fourteenth problem in 1958.[8] The following example was announced at the 1958 International Congress of Mathematicians.
Let be the prime field of a field and let
where the 48 elements are algebraically independent over . Let
be the polynomial ring in 32 variables. Let be the 13-dimensional subspace of consisting of the vectors orthogonal to each of
With its additive group structure, is isomorphic as an algebraic group to . An element acts on by
Nagata proved that the invariant ring is not finitely generated over . If is the field of invariant rational functions, then , so this gives a counterexample to Hilbert's original formulation. For this example, and .
Nagata's other counterexample, published in his 1959 paper, also has , but has .[8]
Later counterexamples
Further counterexamples were constructed with progressively fewer variables. Template:Harvtxt gave a counterexample with and . It was later realized as the invariant ring of a nonlinear action of the additive group .[9] Related constructions gave counterexamples with by Gene Freudenburg[10] and with by Daniel Daigle and Freudenburg.[11]
The subsequent counterexamples of Kuroda reached the theoretical lower bounds for both and . In 2004, Shigeru Kuroda constructed counterexamples with , showing that the lower bound on is sharp.[5] In 2005, he constructed a counterexample with .[6] This also attains the smallest possible value of , since Zariski's theorem gives an affirmative answer for .
In the linear invariant-theoretic setting, Template:Harvs constructed, over the complex numbers, linear actions of the three-dimensional additive group whose invariant rings are not finitely generated. Template:Harvtxt extended such counterexamples to arbitrary fields, giving in particular a linear action of on with a non-finitely generated invariant ring.
See also
References
- Bibliography
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation
- Footnotes